Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Main subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz J Microbiol ; 53(1): 281-288, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060090

ABSTRACT

The production of 3-indoleacetic acid (IAA) by plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) stimulates root development and plant growth. In addition, morphological changes such as an increased root ramification and root hair production improves nutrient absorption and biomass accumulation. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of IAA-producing strains on rice in an advanced stage of its vegetative cycle. Rice was inoculated with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAL 5 and its lao- mutant, deficient in auxin production, Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp 245, and Escherichia coli DH10b. Both the mutant and wild-type G. diazotrophicus stimulated root elongation, area, volume, and diameter. However, the lao- mutant strain was the only one capable of increasing the number of roots. In turn, inoculation with A. baldaniorum had no significant effect on plant development. The inoculation with E. coli led to changes in root volume, area, and diameter, and a response that may be related to the stress caused by its presence. We conclude that the inoculation with G. diazotrophicus stimulates the root system's growth independently of their IAA production ability, suggesting that a metabolite other than IAA is responsible for this effect at advanced stages of the rice's vegetative cycle.


Subject(s)
Oryza , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Indoleacetic Acids/metabolism , Oryza/microbiology , Plant Roots/microbiology
2.
Front Microbiol ; 12: 719653, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34777275

ABSTRACT

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and humic substances (HSs) are promising options for reducing the use of pesticides and mineral fertilizers. Although many studies have shown the effects of PGPB and HSs separately, little information is available on plant responses to the combined application of these biostimulants despite the great potential for the simultaneous action of these biological inputs. Thus, the objective of this review is to present an overview of scientific studies that addressed the application of PGPB and HSs to different crops. First, we discuss the effect of these biostimulants on biological nitrogen fixation, the various effects of the inoculation of beneficial bacteria combined with the application of HSs on promoting the growth of nonleguminous plants and how this combination can increase bacterial colonization of plant hosts. We also address the effect of PGPB and HSs on plant responses to abiotic stresses, in addition to discussing the role of HSs in protecting plants against pathogens. There is a lack of studies that address the role of PGPB + HSs in biocontrol. Understanding the factors involved in the promotion of plant growth through the application of PGPB and HSs can assist in the development of efficient biostimulants for agricultural management. This approach has the potential to accelerate the transition from conventional cultivation to sustainable agrosystems.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...