Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 16(6): 451-7, 2015 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26323447

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the inner surface of two ceramic systems: IPS Empress II (Ivoclar Vivadent, Germany) and In-Ceram Alumina (Vita Zahnfabrick, Germany) submitted to surface treatments, especially by Nd:YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty samples were prepared in pellet form for each ceramic system according to manufacturers' specifications. The samples were stored at room temperature and then be subjected to surface treatment: without treatment (T0) (control), hydrofluoric acid-etched (T1), hydrofluoric acid-etched associated with the airborne particle-abraded (T2); CoJet system (T3), Nd:YAG laser (T4). The data were performed the statistical analysis by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.001). RESULTS: The group control (T0) of the ceramics, the analysis showed the lowest roughness values; for the System Alumina In-Ceram, treatment with hydrofluoric acid (T1), associated with hydrofluoric acid and airborne particle-abraded (T2) and Nd:YAG laser (T4), had no statistically significant difference, whereas for the IPS Empress System II treatment with hydrofluoric acid (T1) and hydrofluoric acid associated with airborne particle-abraded (T2), had no statistically significant difference between the system and also CoJet (T3) and hydrofluoric acid associated with the airborne particle-abraded (T2). Photomicrographs of scanning electron microscopy showed different characteristics to the treatments for each ceramic system. CONCLUSION: The IPS Empress II had the appearance of favoring the retention when treated with hydrofluoric acid, as well as its association with the airborne particle-abraded. Uncertainty in Alumina, treatment with hydrofluoric acid associated with the airborne particle-abraded and CoJet system and provided a surface with irregularities. With respect to the laser further studies should be performed for parameters that are ideal for your application. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ceramic restorations are attractive due of their excellent esthetics and the ability to stay for long periods. However, the retention of ceramic requires further study.


Subject(s)
Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Hydrofluoric Acid/chemistry , Lasers, Solid-State , Materials Testing/methods , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Surface Properties
2.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 16(5): 376-82, 2015 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26162257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 3% phosphate ascorbyl gel (PA) in different times onto the microshear bond strength of composite resin (CR) to bovine enamel treated with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty enamel blocks of bovine incisors were made and divided into 5 groups (n = 6) with three specimens per group (n = 18), according to treatment: G1= No bleaching + CR; G2 = HP + CR after 15d; G3 = HP + CR after 24 hours; G4 = HP + PA (15 min) + CR after 24 hours; G5 = HP + PA (2 hours) + CR after 24 hours. The resin cylinders were made by Tygon matrices. Microshear bond strength test was performed using universal testing machine with a 50N load at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture modes were assessed by a stereomicroscope 40 ×. Microshear bond strength values were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) one-way and Tukey test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: G1 had significant results when compared to G3 and G5 (p < 0.01). However, G2, G3, G4 and G5 have showed no significant differences among groups (p > 0.05). Failure modes were categorized into adhesive (90%) and mixed (10%). CONCLUSION: The use of 3% phosphate ascorbyl gel for 15 minutes was able to improve bond strength of composite resin to bleached bovine enamel, but when 3% phosphate ascorbyl gel was applied during 40 minutes it negatively interfered in the adhesion of the resin to bleached bovine enamel.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/chemistry , Ascorbic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Dental Materials/chemistry , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Tooth Bleaching Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Ascorbic Acid/chemistry , Cattle , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Hydrogen Peroxide/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Materials Testing , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors , Tooth Bleaching Agents/chemistry , Water/chemistry
3.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 16(2): 147-53, 2015 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25906807

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements on the bond strength of nonmetallic posts in different root regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted human teeth were decoronated, endodontically treated, post-space prepared, and divided into six groups. Glass-fiber (GF) posts (Exacto, Angelus) and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts (EverStick, StickTeck) were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Breeze) (SA) (Pentral Clinical) and self-etching resin cement (Panavia-F) (SE) (Kuraray). Six 1-mm-thick rods were obtained from the cervical (C), middle (M), and apical (A) regions of the roots. The specimens were then subjected to microtensile testing in a special machine (BISCO; Schaumburg, IL, USA) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Microtensile bond strength data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. RESULTS: Means (and SD) of the MPa were: GF/SA/C: 14.32 (2.84), GF/SA/M: 10.69 (2.72), GF/SA/A: 6.77 (2.17), GF/SE/C: 11.56 (4.13), GF/SE/M: 6.49 (2.54), GF/SE/A: 3.60 (1.29), FRC/SA/C: 16.89 (2.66), FRC/SA/M: 13.18 (2.19), FRC/SA/A: 8.45 (1.77), FRC/SE/C: 13.69 (3.26), FRC/SE/M: 9.58 (2.23), FRC/SE/A: 5.62 (2.12). The difference among the regions was statistically significant for all groups (p < 0.05). The self-adhesive resin cement showed better results than the self-etching resin cement when compared to each post (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in bond strengths of the resin cements when comparable to each post (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The bond strength values were significantly affected by the resin cement and the highest values were found for self-adhesive resin cement.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure , Post and Core Technique/instrumentation , Resin Cements/chemistry , Cementation/methods , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Glass/chemistry , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Random Allocation , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Tooth Apex/ultrastructure , Tooth Cervix/ultrastructure , Tooth, Nonvital/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...