ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical, surgical, and percutaneous strategies similarly prevent major cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The possibility that these strategies have differential effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been debated, particularly in patients treated outside clinical trials. METHODS: We assigned 454 patients diagnosed with CAD during an elective diagnostic coronary angiography to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimal medical treatment (OMT), and followed them for an average of 5.2 ± 1.5 years. HRQoL was assessed using a validated Brazilian version of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire. The association between therapeutic strategies and quality of life scores was tested using variance analysis and adjusted for confounders in a general linear model. RESULTS: There were no differences in the mental component summary scores in the follow-up evaluation by therapeutic strategies: 51.4, 53.7, and 52.3 for OMT, PCI, and CABG, respectively. Physical component summary scores were higher in the PCI group than the CABG and OMT groups (46.4 vs. 42.9 and 43.8, respectively); however, these differences were no longer different after adjustment for confounding variables. CONCLUSION: In a long-term follow-up of patients with stable CAD, HRQoL did not differ in patients treated by medical, percutaneous, or surgical treatments.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Cohort Studies , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) remains an expressive health problem with high morbimortality rates. Despite its importance, epidemiological and microbiological data remain scarce, especially in developing countries. AIM: This study aims to describe IE epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological profile in a tertiary university center in South America, and to identify in-hospital mortality rate and predictors. METHODS: An observational, retrospective study of 167 patients, who fulfilled modified Duke's criteria during a six-year enrollment period, from January 2010 to December 2015. The primary outcome was defined as in-hospital mortality analyzed according to treatment received (clinical vs surgical). Multivariate analysis identified mortality predictors. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years (Q1 -Q3 50-71), and 66% were male. Echocardiogram demonstrated vegetations in 90.4%. An infective agent was identified in 76.6%, being Staphylococcus aureus (19%), Enterococcus (12%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (10%), and Streptococcus viridans (9.6%) the most prevalent. Overall in-hospital mortality was 41.9%, varying from 49.4% to 34.1%, in clinical and surgical patients, respectively (P = .047). On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 2.5), previous structural heart disease (OR, 3.1), and mitral valve infection (OR, 2.1) were all-cause death predictors. Surgical treatment was the only variable related to a better outcomes (OR, 0.45; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.2-0.9). CONCLUSION: This study presents IE profile and all-cause mortality in a large patient's cohort, comprising a 6-years' time window, a rare initiative in developing countries. Elderly and male patients predominated, while S. aureus was the main microbiological agent. Patients conservatively treated presented higher mortality than surgically managed ones. Epidemiological studies from developing countries are essential to increase IE understanding.
Subject(s)
Endocarditis/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Cohort Studies , Endocarditis/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , South America/epidemiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: to describe, in a practical and step-by-step manner, the construction of a fully electronic platform for data collection, storage, and analysis, initially proposed for cardiovascular surgery, with interfaces that are reproducible and applicable to other surgical specialties, as well as to present the initial work experience with this instrument in cardiac surgery and the preliminary results obtained after its implementation in a Brazilian tertiary university hospital. METHODS: the platform was developed based on Google tools, which are free, easy to use, and widely accessible. From the beginning of this initiative, in May 2015, to the preliminary analysis, in February 2017, data from 271 consecutive patients submitted to cardiovascular surgery were prospectively recorded and preliminarily analyzed. RESULTS: the initiative was implemented with full success, with 100% of patients included and without loss of any variable, in a database composed of more than 500 variables. The most frequent immediate postoperative complications were: atrial fibrillation (22.5%), bronchopneumonia (10.7%), delirium (10.3%), acute renal failure (10%), stroke (5%), and death (7%). Comparing mortality rates in the first and second years of the initiative, a reduction from 10.8% to 4% (p=0.042), respectively, was evidenced. CONCLUSION: the new proposal of data collection and storage presented in this work was fully feasible and effective. It may be useful to other surgical specialties that wish to develop methods to evaluate success and postoperative complication rates, as well as quality improvement programs.
OBJETIVO: descrever de maneira prática e detalhada a criação de uma plataforma totalmente informatizada para coleta, armazenamento e análise de dados, inicialmente proposta para cirurgia cardiovascular, com interfaces reprodutíveis e aplicáveis a outras especialidades cirúrgicas, bem como, apresentar a experiência inicial de trabalho com esta ferramenta e os resultados preliminares obtidos após sua implementação em um hospital universitário terciário brasileiro. MÉTODOS: a plataforma foi desenvolvida com base nas ferramentas Google, gratuitas, de fácil utilização e amplamente acessíveis. Desde o início desta iniciativa, em maio de 2015, até a análise preliminar, em fevereiro de 2017, dados de 271 pacientes, consecutivos, submetidos à cirurgia cardiovascular foram prospectivamente recordados e analisados. RESULTADOS: a iniciativa foi implementada com pleno sucesso, com 100% dos pacientes incluídos e sem perda de qualquer variável em um banco de dados composto por mais de 500 variáveis. As complicações pós-operatórias imediatas mais frequentes foram: fibrilação atrial (22,5%), broncopneumonia (10,7%), delirium (10,3%), insuficiência renal aguda (10%), acidente vascular encefálico (5%) e morte (7%). Comparando-se as taxas de mortalidade no primeiro e segundo anos da iniciativa, uma redução de 10,8% para 4% (p=0,042), respectivamente, foi evidenciada. CONCLUSÃO: a nova proposta de coleta e armazenamento de dados apresentada neste trabalho mostrou-se plenamente factível e efetiva. Por serem gratuitas, de fácil manuseio e universalmente acessíveis, estas ferramentas podem ser úteis a outras especialidades cirúrgicas que desejem desenvolver métodos de avaliação de sucesso e complicações pós-operatórios, bem como, programas de melhoria de qualidade.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures , Databases, Factual/standards , Forms as Topic , Software/standards , Aged , Brazil , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: descrever de maneira prática e detalhada a criação de uma plataforma totalmente informatizada para coleta, armazenamento e análise de dados, inicialmente proposta para cirurgia cardiovascular, com interfaces reprodutíveis e aplicáveis a outras especialidades cirúrgicas, bem como, apresentar a experiência inicial de trabalho com esta ferramenta e os resultados preliminares obtidos após sua implementação em um hospital universitário terciário brasileiro. Métodos: a plataforma foi desenvolvida com base nas ferramentas Google, gratuitas, de fácil utilização e amplamente acessíveis. Desde o início desta iniciativa, em maio de 2015, até a análise preliminar, em fevereiro de 2017, dados de 271 pacientes, consecutivos, submetidos à cirurgia cardiovascular foram prospectivamente recordados e analisados. Resultados: a iniciativa foi implementada com pleno sucesso, com 100% dos pacientes incluídos e sem perda de qualquer variável em um banco de dados composto por mais de 500 variáveis. As complicações pós-operatórias imediatas mais frequentes foram: fibrilação atrial (22,5%), broncopneumonia (10,7%), delirium (10,3%), insuficiência renal aguda (10%), acidente vascular encefálico (5%) e morte (7%). Comparando-se as taxas de mortalidade no primeiro e segundo anos da iniciativa, uma redução de 10,8% para 4% (p=0,042), respectivamente, foi evidenciada. Conclusão: a nova proposta de coleta e armazenamento de dados apresentada neste trabalho mostrou-se plenamente factível e efetiva. Por serem gratuitas, de fácil manuseio e universalmente acessíveis, estas ferramentas podem ser úteis a outras especialidades cirúrgicas que desejem desenvolver métodos de avaliação de sucesso e complicações pós-operatórios, bem como, programas de melhoria de qualidade.
ABSTRACT Objective: to describe, in a practical and step-by-step manner, the construction of a fully electronic platform for data collection, storage, and analysis, initially proposed for cardiovascular surgery, with interfaces that are reproducible and applicable to other surgical specialties, as well as to present the initial work experience with this instrument in cardiac surgery and the preliminary results obtained after its implementation in a Brazilian tertiary university hospital. Methods: the platform was developed based on Google tools, which are free, easy to use, and widely accessible. From the beginning of this initiative, in May 2015, to the preliminary analysis, in February 2017, data from 271 consecutive patients submitted to cardiovascular surgery were prospectively recorded and preliminarily analyzed. Results: the initiative was implemented with full success, with 100% of patients included and without loss of any variable, in a database composed of more than 500 variables. The most frequent immediate postoperative complications were: atrial fibrillation (22.5%), bronchopneumonia (10.7%), delirium (10.3%), acute renal failure (10%), stroke (5%), and death (7%). Comparing mortality rates in the first and second years of the initiative, a reduction from 10.8% to 4% (p=0.042), respectively, was evidenced. Conclusion: the new proposal of data collection and storage presented in this work was fully feasible and effective. It may be useful to other surgical specialties that wish to develop methods to evaluate success and postoperative complication rates, as well as quality improvement programs.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures , Software/standards , Databases, Factual/standards , Forms as Topic , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Brazil , Reproducibility of Results , Internet , Quality Improvement , Hospitals, University , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Partial Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection is a congenital abnormality characterized by drainage of one or more, but not all, pulmonary veins to the right atrium or to one of the systemic veins. This pathology has low prevalence, although it probably is underestimated and is rarely diagnosed in adults. This report describes a case of a 72-year-old woman with long-term worsening shortness of breath and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure in which Partial Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection was occasionally diagnosed through imaging methods.
