Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust Endod J ; 49 Suppl 1: 259-264, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36537343

ABSTRACT

The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical methods in identifying the presence of second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars. The influence of age and experience with microscopy was also assessed. Sixty six teeth were selected and the mesiobuccal canal was confirmed in all of the samples by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. After endodontic cavity access, teeth were evaluated through direct visual; dental loupe and operating microscope. None of the methods was successful in finding the mesiobuccal canal in all samples. Professionals <40, the magnification did not influence the location. Professionals >40, the magnification significantly influenced the location. In the direct vision, professionals >40 years located fewer canals than those <40 years of age with experience. In conclusion, these preliminary findings showed that when the microscope was used, the professionals with experience, regardless of age, found a higher number of canals. The use of the microscope was significant for professionals >40 years.


Subject(s)
Maxilla , Tooth Root , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods
2.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 51(4): 20210314, 2022 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of enhancement filters in detecting small simulated internal root resorptions (IRR). METHODS:: Forty-two extracted human teeth were sectioned, connected, and stored in a dry human jaw and X-rayed with photostimulable phosphor plates (PSPs), composing the control group (CG). In the middle-third of the root canals, IRR lesions were simulated using Da Silveira protocol. Later, the specimens were X-rayed to create the test group (TG). All images acquired were exported with seven enhancement filters plus the original image. Three examiners used a five-point Likert scale to evaluate the images regarding the presence/absence of IRR. Diagnostic efficacy was assessed from sensitivity and specificity results. Comparison among filters was performed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS:: Moderate values of Kappa interexaminer (0.403-0.620) and high values of Kappa intraexaminer (0.757-0.915) were observed. The best performance occurred in the CG (p < 0.05). Original images presented the greatest sensitivity and area under the ROC curve (0.595-0.750), while the Endo filter presented the greatest specificity (0.952). Inversion and Pseudo-3D images produced the greatest doubt in the diagnosis, significant for CG with the Pseudo-3D filter (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:: The Original and 'Endo' filters should be chosen as it offers greater diagnostic ability and allows more confidence during the evaluation.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption , Humans , ROC Curve , Radiography , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...