Characterization of the patterns of care, access, and direct cost of systemic lupus erythematosus in Brazil: findings from the Macunaíma study.

BACKGROUND: A cost of illness (COI) study aims to evaluate the socioeconomic burden that an illness imposes on society as a whole. This study aimed to describe the resources used, patterns of care, direct cost, and loss of productivity due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Brazil. METHODS: This 12-month, cross-sectional, COI study of patients with SLE (ACR 1997 Classification Criteria) collected data using patient interviews (questionnaires) and medical records, covering: SLE profile, resources used, morbidities, quality of life (12-Item Short Form Survey, SF-12), and loss of productivity. Patients were excluded if they were retired or on sick leave for another illness. Direct resources included health-related (consultations, tests, medications, hospitalization) or non-health-related (transportation, home adaptation, expenditure on caregivers) hospital resources.Costs were calculated using the unit value of each resource and the quantity consumed. A gamma regression model explored cost predictors for patients with SLE. RESULTS: Overall, 300 patients with SLE were included (92.3% female,mean [standard deviation (SD)] disease duration 11.8 [7.9] years), of which 100 patients (33.3%) were on SLE-related sick leave and 46 patients (15.3%) had stopped schooling. Mean (SD) travel time from home to a care facility was 4.4 (12.6) hours. Antimalarials were the most commonly used drugs (222 [74.0%]). A negative correlation was observed between SF-12 physical component and SLE Disease Activity Index (- 0.117, p = 0.042), Systemic Lupus International CollaboratingClinics/AmericanCollegeofRheumatology Damage Index (- 0.115, p = 0.046), medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific drugs/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and lost productivity (- 0.570, p < 0.001). For the mental component, a negative correlation was observed with medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific medications/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and missed appointments (- 0.232, p < 0.001). Mean total SLE cost was US$3,123.53/patient/year (median [interquartile range (IQR)] US$1,618.51 [$678.66, $4,601.29]). Main expenditure was medication, with a median (IQR) cost of US$910.62 ($460, $4,033.51). Mycophenolate increased costs by 3.664 times (p < 0.001), and inflammatory monitoring (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein) reduced expenditure by 0.381 times (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results allowed access to care patterns, the median cost for patients with SLE in Brazil, and the differences across regions driven by biological, social, and behavioral factors. The cost of SLE provides an updated setting to support the decision-making process across the country.

Proteinuria and serum creatinine after 12 months of treatment for lupus nephritis as predictors of long-term renal outcome: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with 10-25% of patients progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to elucidate the predictive capabilities of 24-h proteinuria (24PTU) and serum creatinine (sCr) after 12 months of treatment with respect to long-term renal outcomes in LN in a single-center cohort of LN patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 214 patients diagnosed with LN followed in our center. Values of 24PTU and sCr were assessed at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months, and after 5 years and/or the last evaluation. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 months or longer. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) was defined as the need for permanent dialysis. Receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were used to test the best cut-off value of 24PTU and sCr at 12 months who predict bad long-term renal outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 11.2 ± 7.2 years. The best cut-off values for 24PTU and sCr as predictor of CKD were, respectively, 0.9 g/24 h and 0.9 mg/dL. ROC curve for 24PTU had a slightly lower performance than ROC curve for sCr as predictor for CKD (PTU AUC = 0.68; sCr AUC = 0.70), but sensitivity and specificity were better for 24PTU (24PTU: sensitivity = 63.5%, specificity = 71.2%; sCr: sensitivity = 54.8%, specificity = 75.3%). When the outcome was ESRD the best cut-off points were 0.9 g/24hs and 1.3 mg/dL for 24PTU and sCr, respectively, and the curve performance was better for 24PTU (PTU AUC = 0.72; sCr AUC = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In this ethnically diverse population with LN followed for a long time (> 10 years), levels of 24PTU > 0.9/day at 12 months was a good predictor of bad long-term renal outcome. The serum creatinine > 0.9 mg/dL and > 1.3 mg/dL at 12 months were also good predictors of CKD and ESRD, respectively. Patients with 24PTU < 0.9 g/day and sCr < 1.3 mg/dL at 12 months are not likely to develop ESRD because of the high negative predictive values (NPV) (93.2% and 82%). 24PTU and sCr are relevant as components for a treat-to-target strategy for LN treatment, since their high NPV corroborates their importance as good predictors of long-term renal outcome.

Evaluation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels in patients with fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a condition characterized by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain often associated with sleep disorders and mood and whose pathophysiology is still not clearly defined. In recent years, some studies have hinted at a possible association between different types of pain, including the pain present in FM, with vitamin D deficiency. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The present work consisted of a cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum levels in 87 patients with FM, as compared with a control group composed of 92 age- and sex-matched subjects with no chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clinical and laboratory variables that could affect the status of vitamin D were also considered. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between groups either with respect to mean serum concentration of 25(OH)D or as to the classification of levels as deficient, insufficient, or sufficient. There was no correlation of 25(OH)D levels with pain intensity. CONCLUSION: This study showed that light to moderate deficient and insufficient 25(OH)D levels are not found more commonly in patients with FM.

Diagnostic value of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the assessment of disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study comparing anti-nucleosome with anti-dsDNA antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the assessment of clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and active nephritis. METHODS: A 12 month prospective study of 87 patients diagnosed with SLE. At each evaluation, disease activity was scored by SLE Disease Activity Index and Lupus Activity Criteria Count, and blood samples were collected for laboratory tests. Autoantibodies were detected by ELISA. RESULTS: Nearly all patients were female (96.6%). The mean age was 33 years and the mean disease duration was 60.7 months. About half the patients presented with nephritis (49.4%) and active SLE (50.6%) at the first clinical examination. During the study period, the prevalence of active SLE decreased from 50.6% to 29.1%. The prevalence of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies was 40.0%-58.6% and 10.9%-21.8%, respectively, throughout the study period. The sensitivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies for active SLE was 72.7%-100% and 31.3%-54.8%, respectively. The specificity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies for active SLE was 66.7%-83.7% and 88.7%-100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-nucleosome antibodies for active nephritis were 32.0%-67.5% and 46.2%-67.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for anti-dsDNA antibodies for active nephritis were 16.0%-35.4% and 85.1-97.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anti-nucleosome antibodies are more sensitive than anti-dsDNA antibodies to active SLE and active nephritis. Thus, anti-nucleosome antibody reactivity may be a useful marker in the diagnosis and assessment of active SLE.