Biomarker testing strategies in non-small cell lung cancer in the real-world setting: analysis of methods in the Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP).

AIMS: The aim of this study is to extend the analysis of the Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath), by analysing the techniques used in the determination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) for the diagnostic of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Information of the technique used for the determination of EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 was recorded from March 2018 to January 2019 from 44 centres, but only 34 centres matched with the 38 centres previously analysed, allowing to analyse the techniques used in 8970 matched determinations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1. Therefore, a by-centre analysis studied the level of implementation of the techniques in the 44 centres, while a by-determination analysis made it possible to assess the overall frequency of the techniques used on the 9134 matched samples. RESULTS: By-centre analysis showed that only 46.5% and 25.6% of the centres used reflex strategies for ALK and ROS1 determination, respectively. By-determination analysis showed that 94.4% of EGFR determinations were performed by PCR, 80.7% of ALK determinations were performed by IHC with clone D5F3, while 55.7% of ROS1 determinations were performed by IHC with clone D4D6. 22C3 were the PD-L1 clone more used (43.5%) followed by SP263 clone (31.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The real-world evidence obtained from LungPath shows the effort of Spanish hospitals in performing biomarker determination in NSCLC with different methodologies despite that next-generation sequencing (NGS) utilisation in the year of the analysis was low. Biomarker determination results could be optimised with the incorporation of sequencing methods such as NGS in pathology departments.

Measuring productivity loss in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults with major consequences for their autonomy and capacity to maintain employment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact on work productivity in early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤ 3 years, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 were included. Absenteeism, presenteeism, and unpaid work loss due to RRMS were measured using the Valuation of Lost Productivity (VOLP) questionnaire. The EDSS, SymptoMScreen, 5-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire were used to gather information on disability, patients' perception of symptom severity, fatigue, mood/anxiety, cognition, and problems in the workplace, respectively. Associations between the VOLP and clinical and work outcomes were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlations. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included. Mean age (SD) was 36.1 ± 9.4 years and 71.4% were female. Mean disease duration was 1.2 ± 0.8 years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (IQR 0, 2.0). One hundred thirty patients (68.8%) were working for pay or self-employed. Fifty-three patients (40.8%) reported absence from work in the past 3 months with an average of 14.3 absent workdays. Their health problems resulted in the loss of 3.4% of their actual work time in the past 7 days. Thirty patients got help (11.8 h) with their unpaid work activities in the past 7 days. Absenteeism was significantly correlated with anxiety and depression (rho=0.298 and 0.291, p<0.001), fatigue (rho=0.214, p = 0.014), and symptom severity (rho=0.213, p = 0.015). Presenteeism was significantly correlated with fatigue (rho=0.375, p<0.001), symptom severity (rho=0.373, p<0.001), depression (rho=0.263, p = 0.008), and disability (rho=0.215, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Productivity loss even in a RRMS population with short disease duration stresses the need for more efficient treatment control of disease activity from earlier stages.

Cost analysis of the management of brain metastases in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC: alectinib versus crizotinib.

AIM: To estimate management cost of NSCLC ALK+ patients with and without brain metastasis (BM), and to compare annual costs in patients treated with alectinib or crizotinib. METHODS: Management cost/year (€ 2018) in patients with and without BM was estimated with disaggregated resource consumption provided by local oncologists, including medical visits, hospitalizations, diagnostic/laboratory tests, imaging techniques and surgical procedures. The comparison of costs/year with alectinib and crizotinib, considered the cumulative 12-month incidence of BM in ALEX trial (9.4 and 41.4%, respectively). RESULTS: Management cost was €6173.42/patient-year without BM and €21,637.50/patient-year with BM. With alectinib, average cost/patient was lower than crizotinib (€4948.51/patient-year). CONCLUSION: Prevention of BM with alectinib may result in reductions of cost/year in the management of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.