ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine reference values of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in healthy children. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included healthy children aged 6 to 11 years of both sexes. The volunteers underwent a pulmonary function test to rule out respiratory disorders. Respiratory muscle strength was measured using maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), respectively, with MIP close to functional residual capacity (FRC) and residual volume, while MEP to total lung capacity. SNIP was performed through the nostril contralateral to the occlusion, close to FRC. Two 6-minute walk tests were performed to assess functional exercise capacity. RESULTS: The sample comprised 121 healthy children (62 girls); 54% presented body mass index (BMI) percentile less than 85th and 46% more than equal to 85th percentile, higher than expected. SNIP values were similar between sexes (91.1 ± 21.0 cmH2 O in girls and 87.7 ± 19.4 cmH2 O in boys; P = .36) as well as the means of lower limits of normal (56.88 cmH2 O for girls and 56.66 cmH2 O for boys). Girls presented SNIP measurements larger than those of the MIP of FRC (P < .0001), while boys presented similar mean values for both. We found a positive correlation between SNIP and BMI percentile (r = .25, P = .04) in girls, unlike boys, in whom no correlation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: SNIP reference values and mean lower limits of normal were defined for healthy children aged 6 to 11. BMI percentile seems to positively influence the inspiratory muscle strength measured by SNIP in girls only.
Subject(s)
Maximal Respiratory Pressures/standards , Nasal Cavity , Body Mass Index , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Functional Residual Capacity , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Pressure , Reference Values , Residual Volume , Respiratory Function Tests , Respiratory Muscles , Respiratory Tract Diseases/physiopathology , Total Lung CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) lead to different weakness patterns, and most patients with NMDs develop respiratory failure. Inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength can be measured by maximum static inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximum static expiratory pressure (PEmax), and the relationship between them has not been well described in healthy subjects and subjects with NMDs. Our aim was to assess expiratory/inspiratory muscle strength in NMDs and healthy subjects and calculate PEmax/PImax ratio for these groups. METHODS: Seventy (35 males) subjects with NMDs (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, and myotonic dystrophy), and 93 (47 males) healthy individuals 20-80 y of age were evaluated for anthropometry, pulmonary function, PImax, and PEmax, respectively. RESULTS: Healthy individuals showed greater values for PImax and PEmax when compared with subjects with NMDs. PEmax/PImax ratio for healthy subjects was 1.31 ± 0.26, and PEmax%/PImax% was 1.04 ± 0.05; for subjects with NMDs, PEmax/PImax ratio was 1.45 ± 0.65, and PEmax%/PImax% ratio was 1.42 ± 0.67. We found that PEmax%/PImax% for myotonic dystrophy was 0.93 ± 0.24, for myasthenia gravis 1.94 ± 0.6, and for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 1.33 ± 0.62 when we analyzed them separately. All healthy individuals showed higher PEmax compared with PImax. For subjects with NMDs, the impairment of PEmax and PImax is different among the 3 pathologies studied (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy individuals and subjects with NMDs showed higher PEmax in comparison to PImax regarding the PEmax/PImax ratio. Based on the ratio, it is possible to state that NMDs show different patterns of respiratory muscle strength loss. PEmax/PImax ratio is a useful parameter to assess the impairment of respiratory muscles in a patient and to customize rehabilitation and treatment.
