Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent ; 37(12): 970-7, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19686798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of two surface sealants (BisCover/Single Bond) and three application techniques (unsealed/conventional/co-polymerization) on the roughness of two composites (Filtek Z250/Z350) after the toothbrushing test. METHODS: Seventy-two rectangular specimens (5 mm x10 mm x 3 mm) were fabricated and assigned into 12 groups (n=6). Each sample was subjected to three random roughness readings at baseline, after 100,000 (intermediate), and 200,000 (final) toothbrushing strokes. Roughness (R) at each stage was obtained by the arithmetic mean of the reading of each specimen. Sealant removal was qualitatively examined (optical microscope) and classified into scores (0-3). Data were analyzed by Student's paired t-test, two-way ANOVA/Tukey's test, and by Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis and Miller's test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Z250 groups at baseline did not differ statistically from each other. Unsealed Z350 at baseline had lower R values. All the unsealed groups presented gradual decrease in R from baseline to final brushing. From baseline to the intermediate stage, Z250 co-polymerized groups presented a significant reduction in R (score 3). Conventionally sealed groups had no significant changes in R (scores 2-0.8). From baseline to the intermediate stage, the conventionally sealed Z350 Single Bond group had an increase in R (score 1.5). In the final stage, all the conventionally sealed groups presented a reduction in R (scores 0.7-0). Co-polymerized Single Bond groups had a significant reduction in R (scores 2.5-2.7), and co-polymerized BisCover groups an increase in R (scores 2.8-3). CONCLUSIONS: At any brushing stage, sealed composites presented superior performance when compared with unsealed composites.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Toothbrushing/methods , Acid Etching, Dental , Acrylates/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Dental Polishing , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polymers/chemistry , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Water/chemistry
2.
J Dent ; 37(3): 212-8, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19124185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study tested the following null hypotheses: (1) there is no difference in resin-dentine bond strength when an experimental glutaraldehyde primer solution is added prior to bonding procedures and (2) there is no difference in resin-dentine bond strength when experimental glutaraldehyde/adhesive system is applied under dry or wet demineralized dentine conditions. METHODS: Extracted human maxillary third molars were selected. Flat, mid-coronal dentine was exposed for bonding and four groups were formed. Two groups were designated for the dry and two for the wet dentine technique: DRY: (1) Group GD: acid etching+glutaraldehyde primer (primer A)+HEMA/ethanol primer (primer B)-under dried dentine+unfilled resin; (2) Group D: the same as GD, except for primer A application; WET: (3) Group GW: the same as GD, but primer B was applied under wet dentine condition; (4) Group W: the same as GW, except for primer A application. The bonding resin was light-cured and a resin core was built up on the adhesive layer. Teeth were then prepared for microtensile bond testing to evaluate bond strength. The data obtained were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Glutaraldehyde primer application significantly improved resin-dentine bond strength. No significant difference was observed when the same experimental adhesive system was applied under either dry or wet dentine conditions. These results allow the first null hypothesis to be rejected and the second to be accepted. CONCLUSION: Glutaraldehyde may affect demineralized dentine properties leading to improved resin bonding to wet and dry substrates.


Subject(s)
Cross-Linking Reagents/pharmacology , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Glutaral/pharmacology , Resin Cements/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental , Composite Resins , Dental Stress Analysis , Dentin/drug effects , Desiccation , Humans , Hydrogen Bonding , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Methacrylates/pharmacology , Tensile Strength , Water
3.
Quintessence Int ; 38(9): e544-54, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17873975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate wear resistance, by weight loss and roughness changes, of resin cements and indirect restorative materials to toothbrushing and toothbrushing associated with pH-challenge simulation. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The following materials were studied: Enforce resin cement (Dentsply), Rely X resin cement (3M ESPE), Variolink II resin cement (Ivoclar/Vivadent), Artglass indirect resin composite (Heraeus Kulzer), and Duceram Plus porcelain (Degussa). Twenty cylindrical specimens were prepared for each material for a total of 10 groups (n = 10). After finishing and polishing, the specimens were subjected to toothbrushing. One group of each material was pH cycled before abrasion. For toothbrushing, a machine containing soft-bristle tips, dentifrice, and water was used. One hundred thousand brushing cycles were performed. Weight loss was determined as the percentage difference between initial (before brushing) and final (after brushing) measurements. Roughness changes were evaluated by the difference between initial and final measurements. Data were analyzed with the paired t test, 2-way ANOVA, and Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Paired t test showed significant differences in weight loss and roughness after toothbrushing (P <.01). Statistically significant differences were found among materials for both weight loss, which ranged from 0.34% (Duceram Plus) to 1.85% (Enforce/pH), and roughness changes, which ranged from -0.03 microm (Duceram Plus) to 0.29 microm (Rely X/pH). CONCLUSIONS: Among cements, Variolink II exhibited the least weight loss and roughness increase. Of all materials, Duceram Plus porcelain presented the lowest weight loss and became smoother after abrasion. pH cycling had no influence on material weight or roughness changes after abrasion.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Porcelain , Dental Restoration Wear , Resin Cements , Toothbrushing , Analysis of Variance , Dental Stress Analysis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Inlays , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Properties
4.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 15(5): 406-11, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19089169

ABSTRACT

The fluoride release of restorative materials in deionized water has been the subject of many studies, but the behavior of these materials under conditions of acid challenge that simulates the oral cavity, needs to be further explored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release of restorative materials in two storage protocols: deionized water and pH-cycling system (demineralizing solution-pH 4.3 and remineralizing solution-pH 7.0) for 15 days. Eight disks of each material (Vitremer-positive control, Dyract AP, Ariston pHc, Definite, TetricCeram and Z100-negative control) were prepared (11.0 mm x 1.5 mm) and suspended individually in 4.0 mL of each solution, which were daily changed. Daily fluoride release was analyzed with an ion specific electrode (Orion 9609) by the direct method or after HMDS-facilitated diffusion, following 1, 7 and 15 days. The values obtained were converted into microgF/mm(2) and the data analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p< 0.05). The results showed that all materials released more fluoride in the pH-cycling system, except for Ariston pHc which maintained a constant release during the experiment. The highest fluoride release was presented by the positive control, Vitremer in pH-cycling and by Ariston pHc, in deionized water. The negative control Z100 and the resins Definite and TetricCeram did not present statistically significant differences.

5.
J Adhes Dent ; 7(4): 271-9, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16430007

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study tested an in vitro model of dentin hypermineralization, aiming to simulate naturally hypermineralized dentin for bond strength studies. The effect on bond strength of a double-etching treatment on the artificially hypermineralized substrate was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracted human third molars were selected and 2 groups were formed: a group of 3 teeth, called N (normal dentin) and a group of 6 teeth, called H (hypermineralized dentin). Occlusal surfaces were ground flat to expose midcoronal dentin. Group H was subjected to artificial hypermineralization and subdivided into 2 subgroups: Ht and Hd. The exposed dentinal surfaces of group N and subgroup Ht were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s prior to bonding with Single Bond adhesive. Dentin of the subgroup Hd was etched twice (double etching) prior to bonding with Single Bond. A 4-mm-high Z100 composite buildup was created on each tooth and, after 24 h water storage, bond strengths were evaluated by the microtensile method. The data between group N and subgroup Ht and between subgroups Ht and Hd were compared using the Student's t test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between bond strengths of group N and subgroup Ht (p = 0.108). Subgroup Hd was statistically different from Ht (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Bond strengths of Single Bond to artificially hypermineralized dentin did not differ statistically from those to normal dentin substrate. The double etching approach significantly reduced bond strengths of artificially hypermineralized dentin.


Subject(s)
Calcium Phosphates/pharmacology , Dental Bonding , Dentin, Secondary/ultrastructure , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Adhesiveness , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dentin, Secondary/chemically induced , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Zirconium/chemistry
6.
Pesqui Odontol Bras ; 16(4): 343-8, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12612774

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the properties (wear and roughness) of glass ionomer cements that could influence their indication as pit and fissure sealants. The utilized materials were Fuji Plus, Ketac-Molar and Vitremer (in two different proportions: 1:1 and :1). The resin-based sealant Delton was used as control. By means of an electronic balance (precision of 10-4 g), wear was measured in function of weight loss after simulated toothbrushing. Superficial roughness was determined by means of a surface roughness-measuring apparatus. The results revealed that diluted Vitremer and Fuji Plus were less resistant to toothbrushing abrasion and had the greatest increase in superficial roughness. Although in clinical situations luting or diluted ionomer cements are often utilized as alternatives to resin-based sealants, the resultsof this study revealed that the properties of those cements are worse than those of restorative ionomers, whichpresented results similar to those of the evaluated resin sealant.


Subject(s)
Dental Restoration Wear , Glass Ionomer Cements , Pit and Fissure Sealants , Toothbrushing , Glass Ionomer Cements/therapeutic use , Humans , Materials Testing , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Tooth Abrasion/etiology , Toothbrushing/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...