SPF enhancement provided by rutin in a multifunctional sunscreen.

Unprotected chronic exposure to solar radiation can contribute to premature skin cancer and sunscreens are a key factor to avoid those detrimental effects. Currently, there is a growing interest in the photoprotector and antioxidant potential of bioactive substances, such as rutin, that could increase the sun protection factor (SPF) value and, also, donate multifunctional characteristics to sunscreens. Recent in vitro findings indicated that rutin, when incorporated into sunscreens, can provide antioxidant activity and SPF improvement. However, clinical studies are fundamental to determine this activity, due to the lack of repeatability of in vitro methodology and low correlation with the in vivo data. We aimed at evaluating the clinical safety and in vivo SPF of rutin by comparing sunscreen formulations containing 0.1% (w/w) rutin, 3.0% (w/w) butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane and 8.0% (w/w) octyl dimethyl PABA (2-ethylhexyl 4-(dimethylamino)benzoato) with a similar bioactive-free preparation. Additionally, skin hydration, in vitro SPF and in vitro antioxidant activity of rutin, in association with the ultraviolet (UV) filters, were investigated. The safety profile of the formulations under sun-exposed skin conditions qualified the formulas for clinical efficacy assays. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) test confirmed the antioxidant properties of rutin, revealing around 40% increase in radical scavenging potential when the bioactive compound was present. Rutin in combination with the UV filters robustly elevated the clinical SPF around 70%, when compared with the bioactive-free formulation. To date, this is the first report in the specialized literature of an in vivo SPF measurement of a rutin-containing photoprotective preparation, supporting the claim that rutin is an effective and safe bioactive compound to be used in multifunctional sunscreens.

Protective effect of estradiol on acute lung inflammation induced by an intestinal ischemic insult is dependent on nitric oxide.

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that the innate immune system mediates acute lung inflammation triggered by intestinal trauma. Sexual dimorphism modulates the profile of TH1 and TH2 lymphocytes, and accordingly sex hormones may modulate acute lung inflammation by intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). Studies indicate that female rats are relatively resistant to organ injury caused by hemorrhagic shock and that the gut of female is more resistant than that of the male to deleterious effects of ischemic injury. At the present study, we investigated the effect of estradiol (E(2)) on the lung inflammation after intestinal I/R and its interaction with the nitric oxide (NO) pathway. METHODS: Anesthetized female rats submitted or not to 7 days ovariectomy (OVx) were subjected to occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery during 45 min, followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Groups of rats were treated with E(2) (17ß-estradiol, 280 µg/kg, s.c.) 24 h before ischemia and/or with the nonselective NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride) (5 mg/kg, i.v.). In a parallel set of experiments, the selective NO synthase inhibitor, aminoguanidine (50 mg/kg i.v.), was given 1 h before ischemia. In all groups, lung vascular permeability (LVP) was assessed using the Evans blue dye extravasation method, neutrophil recruitment to the tissues by the standard myeloperoxidase (MPO) method, and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) protein expression by Western blot. RESULTS: In OVx rats, LVP and MPO were increased after intestinal I/R as compared with intact controls. Estradiol reverted the LVP, but not MPO. Aminoguanidine reduced LVP in OVx rats. The E(2) protective effect on LVP was abolished by L-NAME; moreover, an increase in LVP even when compared with OVx rats treated only with L-NAME was observed. In addition, lung eNOS protein expression was reduced in OVx-I/R rats in comparison to intact controls and the E(2) inhibited this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Estradiol treatment is able to reduce lung inflammation due to intestinal I/R, but with the concomitant blockade of NOS activity, this effect is abolished. Nitric oxide probably reduces the vascular deleterious effects of intestinal I/R, and E(2) pretreatment reduces lung inflammation after intestinal I/R and exerts these effects by modulating eNOS protein expression in the lungs.