Comparative analysis of torque and apical force to assess the cutting behaviour of ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal endodontic instruments.

This study assessed the cutting properties of two Nickel Titanium file systems with different designs and manufacturing materials. ProTaper Next X1 and X2 (PTN; Dentsply Sirona) and ProTaper Universal S2 and F1 (PTU; Dentsply Sirona) instruments were employed. The cutting parameters, that is torque and apical forces, were determined using a specially designed bench-testing machine. Dimensional and geometric parameters were considered to evaluate the results. The average maximum torque values showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among all instruments. Apical force for PTN X2 and PTU F1 instruments initially decreased and then experienced a rapid increase in the last 2 mm of the canal. For PTN X1 and PTU S2, apical force increased during the entire test. When compared to PTU files, PTN required higher torque and apical forces during the shaping procedure. The results lead us to conclude that PTN instruments demonstrated a lower cutting efficiency than PTU.

Contemporary Root Canal Preparation: Innovations in Biomechanics.

Root canal preparation must serve the goals of supporting debridement while exerting the least amount of structural damage. Toward those goals, several recent trends for innovation are noted: some changes in instrument design, several of them substantial, whereas others are rather discrete. In vitro testing is ongoing and, because of the lack of consistent methodology, gives only some guidelines for clinical use. Lastly, clinical outcome data are lacking for many current instruments; therefore, it is not clear if improvements in flexibility and resistance to fatigue will translate to better outcomes.

Impact of heat treatments on the fatigue resistance of different rotary nickel-titanium instruments.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of M-Wire (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and controlled memory technologies on the fatigue resistance of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files by comparing files made using these 2 technologies with conventional NiTi files. METHODS: Files with a similar cross-sectional design and diameter were chosen for the study: new 30/.06 files of the EndoWave (EW; J. Morita Corp, Osaka, Japan), HyFlex (HF; Coltene/Whaledent, Inc, Cuyahoga Falls, OH), ProFile Vortex (PV; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), and Typhoon (TYP; Clinician's Choice Dental Products, New Milford, CT) systems together with ProTaper Universal F2 instruments (PTU F2; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The compositions and transformation temperatures of the instruments were analyzed using x-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry, whereas the mean file diameter values at 3 mm from the tip (D3) were measured using image analysis software. The average number of cycles to failure was determined using a fatigue test device. RESULTS: X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy analysis showed that, on average, all the instruments exhibited the same chemical composition, namely, 51% Ni-49% Ti. The PV, TYP, and HF files exhibited increased transformation temperatures. The PTU F2, PV, and TYP files had similar D3 values, which were less than those of the EW and HF files. The average number of cycles to failure values were 150% higher for the TYP files compared with the PV files and 390% higher for the HF files compared with the EW files. CONCLUSIONS: M-Wire and controlled memory technologies increase the fatigue resistance of rotary NiTi files.

Mechanical behavior of three nickel-titanium rotary files: A comparison of numerical simulation with bending and torsion tests.

AIM: To assess the flexibility and torsional stiffness of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments by finite element analysis and compare the numerical results with the experiment. METHODOLOGY: Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) size 25, .06 taper (0.25-mm tip diameter, 0.06% conicity) and PTU F1 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) instruments were selected for this study. Experimental tests to assess the flexibility and torsional stiffness of the files were performed according to specification ISO 3630-1. Geometric models for finite element analysis were obtained by micro-CT scanning. Boundary conditions for the numerical analysis were based on the specification ISO 3630-1. RESULTS: A good agreement between the simulation and the experiment moment-displacement curves was found for the three types of instruments studied. RaCe exhibited the highest flexibility and PTU presented the highest torsional stiffness. Maximum values of von Mises stress were found for the PTU F1 file (1185MPa) under bending, whereas the values of von Mises stress for the three instruments were quite similar under torsion. The stress patterns proved to be different in Mtwo under bending, according to the displacement orientation. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable agreement found between simulation and experiment for the three types of instruments studied confirmed the potential of the numerical method to assess the mechanical behavior of endodontic instruments. Thus, a methodology is established to predict the failure of the instruments under bending and torsion.

Effect of lateral pressure motion on the torsional behavior of rotary ProTaper Universal instruments.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the torsional behavior of rotary ProTaper Universal instruments after multiple clinical uses with and without lateral pressure motion. METHODS: Thirty sets of ProTaper Universal instruments were divided into 3 groups (n = 10): control group (CG) involving new instruments tested in torsion on the basis of ISO 3630-1, lateral pressure (LP) group involving instruments that were clinically used on 5 molars by using the shaping instruments S1 and S2 with lateral pressure motion, and no lateral pressure (NLP) group involving instruments that were clinically used on 5 molars without lateral pressure motion. The instruments in the LP and NLP groups were subsequently tested in torsion. Data were analyzed by using analysis of variance (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Multiple clinical uses caused a reduction in the maximum torque in the analyzed instruments. When the effect of using lateral pressure motion with the shaping instruments was assessed, a tendency of reduction in the maximum torque for the S1 and S2 instruments and of increase for the F1 and F2 instruments was observed in the group with lateral pressure motion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lateral pressure motion with the shaping instruments S1 and S2 tended to produce smaller decreases in the torsional resistance of the finishing instruments F1 and F2.

Flexibility and torsional strength of ProTaper and ProTaper Universal rotary instruments assessed by mechanical tests.

The purpose of this study was to assess how the geometric and dimensional changes made on ProTaper Universal (PTU) instruments in comparison with ProTaper (PT) instruments affected their flexibility and torsional strength. Two groups (n = 12) of each type of shaping (S1 and S2) and finishing (F1, F2, and F3) for both PT and PTU instruments were employed. Tip angle, instrument diameter at each millimeter, and cross-sectional area at 3 mm from the tip were the dimensional parameters measured. Flexibility and torsional strength of each instrument (n = 12) were assessed according to specification ISO 3630-1. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (alpha = 0.05). Flexibility increased for S1 and F1 PTU instruments and decreased for F2 and F3, whereas torsional resistance increased for S2, F2, and F3. Changes in tip angle were accompanied by variation of tip geometry in all instruments.