Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

PURPOSE: To gain insight into a new technology, a novel facet arthroplasty device (TFAS) was compared to a rigid posterior fixation system (UCR). The axial and bending loads through the implants and at the bone-implant interfaces were evaluated using an ex vivo biomechanical study and matched finite element analysis. Kinematic behaviour has been reported for TFAS, but implant loads have not. Implant loads are important indicators of an implant's performance and safety. The rigid posterior fixation system is used for comparison due to the extensive information available about these systems. METHODS: Unconstrained pure moments were applied to 13 L3-S1 cadaveric spine segments. Specimens were tested intact, following decompression, UCR fixation and TFAS implantation at L4-L5. UCR fixation was via standard pedicle screws and TFAS implantation was via PMMA-cemented transpedicular stems. Three-dimensional 10 Nm moments and a 600 N follower load were applied; L4-L5 disc pressures and implant loads were measured using a pressure sensor and strain gauges, respectively. A finite element model was used to calculate TFAS bone-implant interface loads. RESULTS: UCR experienced greater implant loads in extension (p < 0.004) and lateral bending (p < 0.02). Under flexion, TFAS was subject to greater implant moments (p < 0.04). At the bone-implant interface, flexion resulted in the smallest TFAS (average = 0.20 Nm) but greatest UCR (1.18 Nm) moment and axial rotation resulted in the greatest TFAS (3.10 Nm) and smallest UCR (0.40 Nm) moments. Disc pressures were similar to intact for TFAS but not for UCR (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These results are most applicable to the immediate post-operative period prior to remodelling of the bone-implant interface since the UCR and TFAS implants are intended for different service lives (UCR--until fusion, TFAS--indefinitely). TFAS reproduced intact-like anterior column load-sharing--as measured by disc pressure. The highest bone-implant moment of 3.1 Nm was measured in TFAS and for the same loading condition the UCR interface moment was considerably lower (0.4 Nm). For other loading conditions, the differences between TFAS and UCR were smaller, with the UCR sometimes having larger values and for others the TFAS was larger. The long-term physiological meaning of these findings is unknown and demonstrates the need for a better understanding of the relationship between spinal arthroplasty devices and the host tissue as development of next generation motion-preserving posterior devices that hope to more accurately replicate the natural functions of the native tissue continues.

During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures.

Results of recent imaging studies and theoretical models suggest that the superior femoral neck is a location of local weakness due to an age-related thinning of the cortex, and thus the site of hip fracture initiation. The purpose of this study was to experimentally determine the spatial and temporal characteristics of the macroscopic failure process during a simulated hip fracture that would occur as a result of a sideways fall. Twelve fresh frozen human cadaveric femora were used in this study. The femora were fractured in an apparatus designed to simulate a fall on the greater trochanter. Image sequences of the surface events related to the fractures were captured using two high-speed video cameras at 9111 Hz. The videos were analyzed with respect to time and load to determine the location and sequence of these events occurring in the proximal femur. The mean failure load was 4032 N (SD 370 N). The first surface events were identified in the superior femoral neck in eleven of the twelve specimens. Nine of these specimens fractured in a clear two-step process that initiated with a failure in the superior femoral neck, followed by a failure in the inferior femoral neck. This cadaveric model of hip fracture empirically confirms hypotheses that suggested that hip fractures initiate with a failure in the superior femoral neck where stresses are primarily compressive during a sideways fall impact, followed by a failure in the inferior neck where stresses are primarily tensile. Our results confirm the superolateral neck of the femur as an important region of interest for future hip fracture screening, prevention and treatment research.