ABSTRACT
Cruzain is the major cysteine protease of Trypanosoma cruzi, the infectious agent responsible for Chagas disease, and cruzain inhibitors display considerable antitrypanosomal activity. In the present work we elucidated crystallographic data of fukugetin, a biflavone isolated from Garcinia brasiliensis, and investigated the role of this molecule as cysteine protease inhibitor. The kinetic analyses demonstrated that fukugetin inhibited cruzain and papain by a slow reversible type inhibition with K(I) of 1.1 and 13.4 µM, respectively. However, cruzain inhibition was about 12 times faster than papain inhibition. Lineweaver-Burk plots demonstrated partial competitive inhibition for cruzain and hyperbolic mixed-type inhibition for papain. Furthermore, the docking results showed that the biflavone binds to ring C' in the S2 pocket and to ring C in the S3 pocket through hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds. Finally, fukugetin also presented inhibitory activity on proteases of the T. cruzi extract, with IC50 of 7 µM.
Subject(s)
Biflavonoids/pharmacology , Biological Products/pharmacology , Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Papain/antagonists & inhibitors , Protozoan Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Biflavonoids/chemistry , Biflavonoids/isolation & purification , Biological Products/chemistry , Biological Products/isolation & purification , Cysteine Endopeptidases/metabolism , Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors/isolation & purification , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fruit/chemistry , Garcinia/chemistry , Kinetics , Molecular Structure , Papain/metabolism , Protozoan Proteins/metabolism , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of sunitinib malate, a multikinase inhibitor molecule. DESIGN: Experimental, Prospective, Controlled. METHODS: Human retinal pigment epithelial (ARPE-19) and human umbilical vein endothelialcells (HUVECS) were used in a culture toxicity test and exposed to different concentrations of sunitinib malate for 18 hours. The HUVECs also were cultured to evaluate the angiogenesis inhibitory effect of sunitinib malate. Fundus photography and angiographic, electrophysiologic, and histopathologic evaluations with light and electron microscopy were performed in two groups of five rabbits each that received different intravitreal concentrations of the drug. Each rabbit received 0.1 ml of sunitinib malate in the right eye (one group with 12.5 mg/ml, the other group with 25 mg/ml); all animals received 0.1 ml of physiologic saline solution in the left eye. After sacrifice, the eyes were enucleated and fixed with modified Karnovsky solution. RESULTS: No toxicity related to sunitinib malate was observed using an in vitro model with the 12.5 and 25 mg/ml solutions in HUVEC and ARPE cell cultures. No toxicity was observed in the in vivo model with 12.5 mg/ml, but light microscopy showed that the 25 mg/ml solution damaged the photoreceptors layer. No functional changes in the electroretinogram were observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib malate 12.5 mg/ml caused no toxicity in in vivo and in vitro models, but the 25 mg/ml concentration caused retinal changes suggesting toxicity in the in vivo model. Further research with the drug is needed in models of ocular neovascularization.
