Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 104, 2024 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neuroimaging studies suggest an association between apathy after deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stimulation of the ventral part of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) due to the associative fibers connected to the non-motor limbic circuits that are involved in emotion regulation and motivation. We have previously described three patients with severe apathy that could be fully treated after switching stimulation from a ventral electrode contact point to a more dorsal contact point. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether more dorsal stimulation of the STN decreases apathy compared to standard care in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. METHODS: We will include 26 patients with a Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS) score of 14 or more after subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease. This is a multicenter trial conducted in two teaching hospitals and one university medical center in the Netherlands after at least 3 months of STN DBS. Our intervention will consist of 1 month of unilateral dorsal STN stimulation compared to treatment as usual. The primary outcome is a change in SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the original contact compared to the SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the more dorsal contact. Secondary outcomes are symptom changes on the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part III, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire, Parkinson's disease impulsive-compulsive disorders questionnaire, changes in levodopa-equivalent daily dosage, apathy rated by the caregiver, and burden and quality of life of the caregiver. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NL8279. Registered on January 10, 2020.


Subject(s)
Apathy , Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Subthalamic Nucleus , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Cross-Over Studies , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
2.
Brain Stimul ; 16(5): 1289-1291, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Apathy is reported after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) and associated with a decreased quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Recent studies hypothesized that the location of active DBS contact point relative to the STN subdivisions (motor, associative and limbic) could be related to an increase of apathy. METHODS: 22 PD-patients that underwent STN DBS between January 2019 and February 2020 were divided in an apathy and non-apathy group using the change in the Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS) after six months of DBS. For both groups the location of DBS electrodes was determined based on 7T MRI subthalamic network analysis, enabling visualization of the subdivisions and their projections relative to the active contact point. MDS-UPDRS III scores were included to evaluate DBS effect. RESULTS: In six patients a post-DBS increase in apathy score was assessed, versus 16 non-apathy patients. Network analysis showed that active contacts in apathy patients were more often positioned in or close to the area within the STN with high density of surrounding projections to associative cortex areas than in non-apathy patients; 63% apathy versus 42% (P = 0.02). The density of surrounding motor projections was lower in the group with increased apathy (18%) than in the group without increased apathy (38%, P = 0.01). Motor UPDRS improvement for the apathy group was 39% and for the non-apathy group 58% (n.s.) CONCLUSION: This new approach in patient-specific subthalamic 7T MRI network analysis visualized an anatomical connectivity substrate for apathy in DBS, with active electrode contacts predominantly in the associative STN.


Subject(s)
Apathy , Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3.
Clin Park Relat Disord ; 9: 100200, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252676

ABSTRACT

Introduction: There are currently no effective treatments for primary orthostatic tremor (POT). An adequate disease-specific POT severity scale is a prerequisite to conduct clinical trials and monitor disease severity in clinical practice. Recently, the English OT-10 scale has been developed for this purpose. Here we aimed to obtain a scale to measure the severity of POT in Dutch speaking individuals. Methods: An established translation, adaptation and validation approach was employed to obtain a Dutch version of the OT-10 scale. Validation was performed in a Dutch POT cohort (n = 46). Results: A Dutch OT-10 scale was obtained which showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80), total score test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80), and concurrent validity (Pearson correlation > 0.80). Item-to-total correlation was good (weighted kappa > 0.40) for all items, and item test-retest reliability was good (weighted kappa > 0.40) for eight out of ten items. Overall, the Dutch OT-10 scale demonstrated acceptable validity. Conclusions: We obtained and validated a Dutch version of the OT-10 scale, capturing POT severity. Next to its use in clinical practice, translation and validation of the OT-10 scale in more languages will help to find evidence-based treatments for POT.

4.
BMC Neurol ; 23(1): 160, 2023 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37085773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment for disabling motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) that persist despite optimal pharmacological treatment. Currently, DBS is not performed if there is concomitant significant cognitive impairment based on concerns of cognitive deterioration, higher complication rate and less functional improvement. However, this has not been investigated so far. METHODS: A single center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE design) pilot clinical trial is being performed. Patients are eligible for the trial if they have PD dementia (PDD), are able to provide informed consent, and experience disabling motor response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, or painful dystonia, despite optimal pharmacological treatment. In total 44 patients will be randomized to either STN-DBS accompanied by best medical treatment (DBS group) or to best medical treatment alone (BMT group). The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline to 30 weeks on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III score in a standardized off-drug phase. The main secondary outcome measures consist of scales assessing cognitive aspects of daily living, neuropsychiatric symptoms and impulsive compulsive disorders. Additional secondary outcome measures include motor signs during on-drug phase, dyskinesia, motor fluctuations, cognitive performance, (severe) adverse events, treatment satisfaction, and caregiver burden. Patients will be followed during 52 weeks after randomization. DISCUSSION: The Deep Brain Stimulation for MOtor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease DEmentia (DBS-MODE) trial directly compares the effectiveness and safety of DBS with BMT in patients with PDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DBS-MODE trial has been registered in the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (NL9361) on the 24th of March 2021 ( https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9361 ).


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Deep Brain Stimulation , Dementia , Dyskinesias , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 146: 147-161, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36543611

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Local field potential (LFP) recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes are often contaminated with electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts that hinder the detection of disease-specific electrical brain activity. METHODS: Three ECG suppression methods were evaluated: (1) QRS interpolation of the Perceive toolbox, (2) template subtraction, and (3) singular value decomposition (SVD). LFPs were recorded with the Medtronic PerceptTM PC system in nine Parkinson's disease patients with stimulation OFF ("OFF-DBS"; anode disconnected) and ON at 0 mA ("ON-DBS 0 mA"; anode connected). Findings were verified with simulated ECG-contaminated time series. RESULTS: ECG artifacts were present in 10 out of 18 ON-DBS 0 mA recordings. All ECG suppression methods drastically reduced artifact-induced beta band (13-35 Hz) power and at least partly recovered the beta peak and beta burst dynamics. Using external ECG recordings and lengthening artifact epoch length improved the performance of the suppression methods. Increasing epoch length, however, elevated the risk of flattening the beta peak and losing beta burst dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: The SVD method formed the preferred trade-off between artifact cleaning and signal loss, as long as its parameter settings are adequately chosen. SIGNIFICANCE: ECG suppression methods enable analysis of disease-specific neural activity from signals affected by ECG artifacts.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Artifacts , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Electrodes , Electrocardiography
6.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 28(1): 58-68, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36571466

ABSTRACT

Tremor in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is common, often unresponsive to treatment, and may contribute to disability. We aim to investigate whether tremor is associated with disability as measured in daily practice and clinical trials, independent of other impairments. We included 76 CIDP patients in this cross-sectional study. We assessed tremor with the Tremor Research Group essential tremor rating assessment scale (TETRAS) and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin clinical rating scale (FTM). Disability was measured with the inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS) and the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT-DS, categorized separately in arm score, or total score). Impairments including strength, sensory impairment, and fatigue were measured using specific impairment scales. We tested whether "the presence of a clinically relevant tremor" (based on TETRAS and FTM) or "tremor severity" (FTM part B sum score) was associated with disability scores (I-RODS, INCAT-DS total score, and INCAT-DS arm score), independent of the impairment scores, using multivariate regression. Both "the presence of a clinically relevant tremor" and "tremor severity" were significantly associated with disability measured by the INCAT-DS (arm score and total score), but not the I-RODS, independent of strength, sensory impairment, and fatigue. The explained variances were low. Clinically relevant tremor can (partly) explain disability in CIDP, as measured with the INCAT-DS, independent of muscle strength, sensory deficits, and fatigue. To assess disease activity in CIDP patients with tremor, both impairment and disability outcomes should be assessed, as disability is caused partly by tremor while the effect of immunotherapy on tremor seems limited.


Subject(s)
Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating , Humans , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/complications , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/diagnosis , Tremor/diagnosis , Tremor/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Fatigue/diagnosis , Fatigue/etiology
10.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract ; 7: 103-106, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35345863

ABSTRACT

Background: Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common movement disorders, and continuous deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for medication-refractory cases. However, the need for increasing stimulation intensities, with unpleasant side effects, and DBS tolerance over time can be problematic. The advent of novel DBS devices now provides the opportunity to longitudinally record LFPs using the implanted pulse generator, which opens up possibilities to implement adaptive DBS algorithms in a real-life setting. Methods: Here we report a case of thalamic LFP activity recorded using a commercially available sensing-enabled DBS pulse generator (Medtronic Percept PC). Results: In the OFF-stimulation condition, a peak tremor frequency of 3.8 Hz was identified during tremor evoking movements as assessed by video and accelerometers. Activity at the same and supraharmonic frequency was seen in the frequency spectrum of the LFP data from the left vim nucleus during motor tasks. Coherence analysis showed that peripherally recorded tremor was coherent with the LFP signal at the tremor frequency and supraharmonic frequency. Conclusion: This is the first report of recorded tremor-related thalamic activity using the electrodes and pulse generator of an implanted DBS system. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the clinical potential of these fully implantable systems, and ultimately pulse generators with sensing-coupled algorithms driving stimulation, to really close the loop.

11.
Trials ; 23(1): 141, 2022 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35164821

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Organizing and executing a large clinical trial is a complex process, and often recruitment targets are not met. We describe the organization of the Levodopa in the Early Parkinson's disease (LEAP) trial and the results of an external assessment of the recruitment process. METHODS: Several strategies were used to ensure that recruitment for the trial was effective and efficient. We analyzed the patterns in referrals, inclusions, and non-inclusions to investigate whether there were bottlenecks in the referral and inclusion process. For the external assessment of the recruitment process, the QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) was used retrospectively, focusing on finding possible issues impeding recruitment that are less easily recognized. RESULTS: Recruitment took 57 months, which was 27 months longer than initially expected. 6.8% of the estimated eligible patients in the Netherlands were included. The number of referrals differed widely between participating centers and regions in the Netherlands, with the region of the principal study center having the most referrals. Reasons of exclusion varied across regions, as in some regions more patients already started, wanted to start, or did not want to start with Parkinson medication compared to other regions. DISCUSSION: Executing a large, investigator-initiated clinical trial on a limited budget still remains possible by focusing on minimizing administrative and organizational procedures. Our study suggests that centers with closer institutional ties to a principal study center tend to have a higher referral rate. The review of the LEAP trial recruitment strategies and data using the QRI-Two suggested that the variations in referrals and reasons of non-inclusion could indicate the presence of issues related to clinical equipoise, patient eligibility, or study presentation. Integrating a recruitment intervention could have explored issues with study presentation and equipoise that might have increased recruitment efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN30518857 . The registration was initiated on 02/08/2011 and finalized on 25/08/2011. Recruitment started on 17/08/2011, after the initiation of public registration.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Parkinson Disease , Patient Selection , Eligibility Determination , Humans , Netherlands , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
12.
BMC Neurol ; 20(1): 40, 2020 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment. METHODS: A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register identifier 4753, registered November 3rd, 2014; EudraCT number 2014-001501-32, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02480803.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Deep Brain Stimulation/economics , Female , Humans , Levodopa/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/economics , Research Design
13.
Trials ; 18(1): 417, 2017 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28882161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to investigate if deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) under general anesthesia further improves outcome by lessening postoperative cognitive, mood, and behavioral adverse effects; shorten surgical time and hospital admittance; and produce comparable symptomatic and functional improvement to surgery under local anesthesia. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will be a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial comparing DBS under general anesthesia with DBS under local anesthesia. The primary outcome measure is a composite score of the postoperative cognitive, mood, and behavioral adverse effects and will be measured 6 months after surgery. The secondary outcome measures consist of changes in motor symptoms, adverse effects of stimulation and surgical complications, surgical time, functional health, quality of life, patient satisfaction with the outcome of treatment, patient evaluation of the burden of therapy, and medication. A total of 110 patients with advanced PD who are candidates for DBS will be randomized during a 2.5-year period. DISCUSSION: The aim of this trial is to further enhance the effectiveness of DBS treatment in PD while reducing the burden of DBS surgery by studying if DBS surgery under general anesthesia results in less cognitive, mood, and behavioral adverse effects compared with surgery under local anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5809 . Registered on 23 April 2016.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Local , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiopathology , Affect , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Clinical Protocols , Cognition , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Motor Activity , Netherlands , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
BMC Neurol ; 15: 236, 2015 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26584951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate if early treatment with levodopa has a beneficial disease modifying effect on Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms and functional health, improves the ability to (maintain) work, and reduces the use of (informal) care, caregiver burden, and costs. Additionally, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of early levodopa treatment will be assessed. METHODS: To differentiate between the direct symptomatic effects and possible disease modifying effects of levodopa, we use a randomised delayed-start double-blind placebo-controlled multi-centre trial design. Patients with early stage PD whose functional health does not yet necessitate initiation of PD-medication will be randomised to either 40 weeks of treatment with levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg TID including 2 weeks of dose escalation or to 40 weeks placebo TID. Subsequently, all patients receive levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg TID for 40 weeks. There are 8 assessments: at baseline and at 4, 22, 40, 44, 56, 68, and 80 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the difference in the mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores between the early- and delayed-start groups at 80 weeks. Secondary outcome measures are rate of progression, the AMC Linear Disability Score, side effects, perceived quality of life with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), ability to (maintain) work, the use of (informal) care, caregiver burden, and costs. 446 newly diagnosed PD patients without impaired functional health need to be recruited in order to detect a minimal clinical relevant difference of 4 points on the total UPDRS at 80 weeks. DISCUSSION: The LEAP-study will provide insights into the possible disease modifying effects of early levodopa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN30518857, EudraCT number 2011-000678-72.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/therapeutic use , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Humans , Netherlands , Quality of Life , Time-to-Treatment
15.
Brain Stimul ; 8(4): 730-41, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25753176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A new 32-contacts deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead, capable of directionally steering stimulation, was tested intraoperatively. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to perform recordings from the multidirectional contacts and to investigate the effect of directional current steering on the local field potentials (LFPs). METHODS: In eight patients with Parkinson's disease, after standard microelectrode recording and clinical testing, the new lead was temporarily implanted. The 32-channel LFP recordings were measured simultaneously at different depths and directions before and after directional stimulation. RESULTS: The spatial distribution of LFPs power spectral densities across the contact array at baseline marked the borders of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) with a significant increase in beta power and with a mean accuracy of approximately 0.6 mm in four patients.The power in the 18.5-30 Hz frequency band varied across different directions in all patients. In the three cases that showed improvement of rigidity, this was higher when current was steered toward the direction with the highest LFP power in the beta band. Subthalamic LFPs in six patients showed a differential frequency-dependent suppression/enhancement of the oscillatory activity in the 10-45 Hz frequency band after four different 'steering' modes as compared to ring mode, suggesting a higher specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Through a new 32-contact DBS lead it is possible to record simultaneous subthalamic LFPs at different depths and directions, providing confirmation of adequate lead placement and multidirectional spatial-temporal information potentially related to pathological subthalamic electrical activity and to the effect of stimulation. Although further research is needed, this may improve the efficiency of steering stimulation.


Subject(s)
Brain Waves/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Signal Detection, Psychological/physiology
16.
ISRN Neurol ; 2014: 345132, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24693450

ABSTRACT

Background. Differentiating Parkinson's disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy (MSA) can be challenging especially early in the course of the disease. Previous studies have shown that midbrain serotonin transporter (SERT) availability in patients with established MSA was significantly lower compared to PD. It is unknown if this is also true for early-stage patients. Methods. 77 early-stage, untreated PD patients were recruited between 1995 and 1998, underwent [(123)I] ß -CIT SPECT imaging, and were followed for at least five years. 16 patients were lost to followup, and in 4 the diagnosis was changed to another atypical parkinsonian syndrome, but not in MSA. In 50 patients, the PD diagnosis was unchanged at followup. In seven patients, the diagnosis was changed to MSA at followup. We retrospectively assessed baseline midbrain SERT availability as well as midbrain SERT-to-striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) ratios. Results. No difference in baseline [(123)I] ß -CIT SERT availability was found. The midbrain SERT-to-striatal DAT ratio for whole striatum was significantly lower in patients with PD compared to MSA (P = 0.049). However, when adjusting for the disease duration at imaging this difference is not significant (P = 0.070). Conclusion. Midbrain SERT availability is not different between early-stage PD and MSA. Therefore, SERT imaging is not useful to differentiate between early PD and MSA.

17.
Neurology ; 81(4): 346-52, 2013 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23794682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined the development of Parkinson disease (PD)-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in patients with newly diagnosed PD over 5 years using recently proposed consensus criteria, and we assessed the reliability of the criteria. METHODS: Patients with PD (n = 123) underwent extensive neuropsychological testing at baseline and after 3 (n = 93) and 5 years (n = 59). Two neuropsychologists independently applied the PD-MCI criteria to examine the interrater and intrarater reliability. RESULTS: At baseline, 35% of patients had PD-MCI. Three years later, 53% of the patients had PD-MCI. At 5-year follow-up, 20 patients who had PD-MCI at an earlier assessment had converted to PD dementia and 50% of the remaining patients without dementia had MCI. The interrater reliability (kappa) was 0.91. The intrarater reliabilities were 0.85 and 0.96. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients with newly diagnosed PD fulfill the consensus criteria for PD-MCI; after 5 years, this proportion is approximately 50% of patients without dementia. The criteria have good interrater and intrarater reliability.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Disease Progression , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Neuropsychological Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
18.
Neurology ; 77(4): 325-33, 2011 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21753163

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Using a family study design, we describe the motor and nonmotor phenotype in probands with LRRK2 G2019S mutations and family members and compare these individuals to patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease (iPD) and unrelated controls. METHODS: Probands with G2019S mutations and their first-degree relatives, subjects with iPD, and unrelated control subjects were identified from 4 movement disorders centers. All underwent neurologic examinations and tests of olfaction, color vision, anxiety, and depression inventories. RESULTS: Tremor was more often a presenting feature among 25 individuals with LRRK2-associated PD than among 84 individuals with iPD. Subjects with LRRK2-PD had better olfactory identification compared with subjects with iPD, higher Beck Depression Inventory scores, and higher error scores on Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test of color discrimination. Postural or action tremor was more common among 29 nonmanifesting mutation carriers compared with 53 noncarriers within the families. Nonparkinsonian family members had higher Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores, more constipation, and worse color discrimination than controls, regardless of mutation status. CONCLUSIONS: Although tremor is a more common presenting feature of LRRK2-PD than iPD and some nonmotor features differed in degree, the phenotype is largely overlapping. Postural or action tremor may represent an early sign. Longitudinal evaluation of a large sample of nonmanifesting carriers will be required to describe any premotor phenotype that may allow early diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heterozygote , Mutation , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Phenotype , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/genetics , Color Vision Defects/complications , Color Vision Defects/genetics , Depression/complications , Depression/genetics , Family , Female , Humans , Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2 , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination/methods , Olfaction Disorders/complications , Olfaction Disorders/genetics , Parkinson Disease/complications , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Tremor/complications , Tremor/genetics
19.
Eur J Neurol ; 17 Suppl 1: 102-6, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20590816

ABSTRACT

In a literature survey, 341 patients with primary and 109 with secondary dystonias treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) were identified. In general, the outcomes for primary dystonias were more favourable compared to the secondary forms. For some secondary dystonias--like tardive dystonia, myoclonus-dystonia (M-D), NBIA (PANK2), the outcome was very good. Only for the primary generalized dystonias, the efficacy of GPi-DBS has been confirmed in randomised controlled trials. Predictors of outcome are the experience and dedication of the stereotactic team, the selection of patients--the diagnosis and pre-operative screening--and the quality of the post-operative care. Predictors of negative outcome are long duration of the disease--with contractures or scoliosis--and concomitant symptoms like spasticity and cerebellar dysfunction. More studies are required to establish the role of GPi-DBS in the treatment of secondary dystonias.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/economics , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Dystonia/economics , Dystonia/therapy , Patient Selection , Dystonia/classification , Globus Pallidus/physiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...