Real-world impact of anti-HER2 therapy-related cardiotoxicity in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anti-HER2 therapy-related cardiotoxicity is well described in the context of clinical trials, particularly in the setting of early stage disease, but there is more limited data in advanced breast cancer and in the real world setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospectively-maintained registry database with 312 consecutive patients diagnosed with HER2 positive advanced breast cancer in Australia was analysed. RESULTS: 287 patients (92%) received anti-HER2 therapy, 17 (6%) experienced anti-HER2 therapy-related cardiotoxicity. Patients who experienced cardiotoxicity were more likely to have ≥2 risk factors for cardiotoxicity (OR 3.9 95% CI 1.4-11.3 p = 0.01). A prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease was significantly associated with cardiotoxicity (OR 7.1 95% CI 1.3-39.5). Cardiotoxicity resolved on imaging in 65% of patients; there was no association between severity and resolution. 11 patients (65%) received cardiologist input. Of the patients who developed cardiotoxicity, 12 patients (71%) received further anti-HER2 therapy in the first- or second-line setting without recurrent cardiotoxicity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Therapy-related cardiotoxicity is an uncommon complication of anti-HER2 therapy in the real world setting. Cardiac toxicity resolved in the majority of affected patients, and further anti-HER2 therapy was administered without recurrence of cardiac issues. Our data suggests anti-HER2 therapy can be safely given in routine care, even in patients with risk factors for toxicity.

Effects of neratinib on health-related quality of life in women with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: longitudinal analyses from the randomized phase III ExteNET trial.

BACKGROUND: We report longitudinal health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data from the international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III ExteNET study, which demonstrated an invasive disease-free survival benefit of extended adjuvant therapy with neratinib over placebo in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (N = 2840) with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer who had completed trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy were randomly assigned to neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo for 12 months. HRQoL was an exploratory end point. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Changes from baseline were compared using analysis of covariance with no imputation for missing values. Sensitivity analyses used alternative methods. Changes in HRQoL scores were regarded as clinically meaningful if they exceeded previously reported important differences (IDs). RESULTS: Of the 2840 patients (intention-to-treat population), 2407 patients were evaluable for FACT-B (neratinib, N = 1171; placebo, N = 1236) and 2427 patients for EQ-5D (neratinib, N = 1186; placebo, N = 1241). Questionnaire completion rates exceeded 85%. Neratinib was associated with a decrease in global HRQoL scores at month 1 compared with placebo (adjusted mean differences: FACT-B total, -2.9 points; EQ-5D index, -0.02), after which between-group differences diminished at later time-points. Except for the FACT-B physical well-being (PWB) subscale at month 1; all between-group differences were less than reported IDs. The FACT-B breast cancer-specific subscale showed small improvements with neratinib at months 3-9, but all were less than IDs. Sensitivity analyses exploring missing data did not change the results. CONCLUSIONS: Extended adjuvant neratinib was associated with a transient, reversible decrease in HRQoL during the first month of treatment, possibly linked to treatment-related diarrhea. With the exception of the PWB subscale at month 1, all neratinib-related HRQoL changes did not reach clinically meaningful thresholds. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00878709.

Benefits and risks of adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid in stage II/III breast cancer. 10 years follow-up of the AZURE randomized clinical trial (BIG 01/04).

Adjuvant bisphosphonates improve disease outcomes in postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) but the long-term effects are poorly described. The AZURE trial (ISRCTN79831382) was designed to determine whether adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZOL) improves disease outcomes in EBC. Previous analyses showed no effect on overall outcomes but identified benefits in postmenopausal women. Here we present the long-term risks and benefits of adjuvant ZOL with 10-years follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 3360 patients with stage II/III breast cancer were included in an academic, international, phase III, randomized, open label trial. Patients were followed up on a regular schedule until 10 years. Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to standard adjuvant systemic therapy +/- intravenous ZOL 4 mg every 3-4 weeks x6, and then at reduced frequency to complete 5 years treatment. The primary outcome was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included invasive DFS (IDFS), overall survival (OS), sites of recurrence, skeletal morbidity and treatment outcomes according to primary tumor amplification of the transcription factor, MAF. Pre-planned subgroup analyses focused on interactions between menopausal status and treatment effects. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 117 months [IQR 70.4-120.4), DFS and IDFS were similar in both arms (HRDFS  = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.84-1.06, p = 0.340; HRIDFS  = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.82-1.02, p = 0.116). However, outcomes remain improved with ZOL in postmenopausal women (HRDFS  = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.67-1.00; HRIDFS  = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64-0.94). In the 79% of tested women with a MAF FISH negative tumor, ZOL improved IDFS (HRIDFS  = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58-0.97) and OS HROS  = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.50-0.94), irrespective of menopause. ZOL did not improve disease outcomes in MAF FISH + tumors. Bone metastases as a first DFS recurrence (BDFS) were reduced with ZOL (HRB-DFS  = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.63-0.92, p = 0.005). ZOL reduced skeletal morbidity with fewer fractures and skeletal events after disease recurrence. 30 cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the ZOL arm (1.8%) have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Disease benefits with adjuvant ZOL in postmenopausal early breast cancer persist at 10 years of follow-up. The biomarker MAF identified a patient subgroup that derived benefit from ZOL irrespective of menopausal status.

The impact and indications for Oncotype DX on adjuvant treatment recommendations when third-party funding is unavailable.

OBJECTIVES: Industry-supported decision impact studies demonstrate that Oncotype Dx (ODX) changes treatment recommendations (TR) in 24-40% of hormone receptor+/HER2- patients. ODX is not reimbursed by third-party payers in Australia, potentially resulting in more selective use. We sought to evaluate the impact of self-funded ODX on TRs. METHODS: Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, indication for ODX and pre- and post-recurrence score (RS) TR. Primary endpoint was frequency of TR change and associations with TR change were sought. RESULTS: Eighteen physicians contributed 382 patients (median age 54). A total of 232 (61%) of tumors were T1 and were grade 1, 2 and 3 in 49 (13%), 252 (66%) and 79 (21%). A total of 257 (67%) were node negative. Assay indications were: confirm need for chemotherapy (CT) (36%), confirm omission of CT (40%) and genuine equipoise (24%). RS was low (≤17) in 55%, intermediate (18-31) in 36% and high (≥32) in 9%. Thirty-eight percent of patients had TR change post-ODX. Sixty-five percent of patients recommended CT pre-ODX changed to hormone therapy alone (HT)-more likely if lower grade and if ER and/or PR > 10%. Fourteen percent of patients with pre-ODX TR for HT added CT-more likely if ER and/or PR ≤10% and if Ki67 > 15% Overall, TR for CT decreased from 47% to 24%. CONCLUSION: Patient-funded ODX changed TRs in 38% of patients, de-escalating 65% from CT to HT and adding CT to 14% of those recommended HT. These changes were greater than an industry-funded study suggesting that physicians can identify situations where the assay may influence decisions.

A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle. RESULTS: There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.

Multimodality therapy in inflammatory breast cancer: is there a place for surgery?

BACKGROUND: In many centres surgery is used as part of a combined modality approach to the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Nevertheless, its value is controversial given the high risk of metastatic relapse and poor overall prognosis. We have reviewed patients with true IBC prospectively treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital in chemotherapy trials to assess further the role of surgery as part of combined modality treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients who had responsive or stable disease to primary chemotherapy went on to have either radiotherapy alone (n = 35) or surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 19); the decision on surgery was based partly on clinician preference and partly on clinical response. RESULTS: The 35 patients undergoing radiotherapy alone had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 16 months and median overall survival (OS) of 35 months. Twenty-four patients (69%) have relapsed with a total of twelve (34%) relapsing locally. In comparison, the 19 patients receiving both surgery and radiotherapy had a PFS of 20 months, and a median OS of 35 months. Fifteen patients (79%) have relapsed, eight (42%) of these locally. None of these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not suggest a clinical advantage for surgery in addition to chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with IBC. They support the need for a prospective randomised trial to address this question.

Low-dose oral fluorouracil with eniluracil as first-line chemotherapy against advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Eniluracil (776C85) is an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase that allows continuous low-dose oral fluorouracil (5-FU) to be given with predicable oral bioavailability. We have assessed this as first-line oral chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer without previous chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered onto this open-label phase II study. Patients received oral 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil 10 mg/m(2), both given twice daily for the first 28 days of each 35-day cycle, continuing until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were entered, with a median age of 53 years. Sixteen partial responses were seen in twenty-nine assessable patients (55%; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 73%), including responses in four (40%) out of 10 patients who had received prior adjuvant 5-FU. Seven patients had stable disease for at least 3 months with symptom improvement. Median response duration was 14 months (range, 10 to 18+ months). Toxicity was low. There were only two episodes of drug-related grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (diarrhea and infection), and only 6%, 3%, and 3% of patients developed granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenic sepsis, respectively. Mild (grade 1/2) diarrhea occurred in 39% of patients, hand-foot syndrome in 15%, nausea in 27%, and mucositis in 18%. Toxicity-associated delay and dose reduction occurred in only 2% and 5% of courses, respectively. CONCLUSION: First-line treatment with the combination of oral 5-FU and eniluracil has high activity in patients with advanced breast cancer comparable with the most active conventional cytotoxic agents but with strikingly less toxicity.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of pegylated megakaryocyte growth and development factor in humans.

Phase I studies with pegylated megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), a c-Mpl ligand that stimulates megakaryopoiesis, have demonstrated that PEG-rHuMGDF is biologically active alone and causes a dose-related enhancement of platelet recovery when administered after chemotherapy. Here we report the dose-ranging pharmacokinetics of PEG-rHuMGDF. Pre-injection blood samples were drawn daily for pharmacokinetic studies on 43 patients. An ELISA, established using PEG-rHuMGDF as the standard, was able to quantitate Mpl ligand at concentrations > 0.02 ng/mL. Over the dose range 0.03 to 5.0 microg/kg/day, subcutaneous administration produced linear increases in steady-state serum levels. Maximum levels of PEG-rHuMGDF attained after 5.0 microg/kg/day were 5.88 to 10.9 ng/mL. After discontinuation of PEG-rHuMGDF, concentrations of Mpl ligand returned to baseline within 5 days. The pharmacokinetics were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption, an absorption delay, and non linear clearance over the first 48 hours. The mean terminal half-life was 33.3 + 16.7 hours, and the average apparent at steady state was 27.7 + 14.0 mL/h/kg; both were independent of administered dose. The apparent clearance of PEG-rHuMGDF was not predicted by platelet count. Administration of chemotherapy and Filgrastim did not alter the pharmacokinetics of PEG-rHuMGDF.

Continuous infusional combination chemotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer: a phase II study.

Despite the introduction of systemic chemotherapy, inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remains a disease with a poor prognosis. We performed this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of infusional chemotherapy as initial treatment in patients with IBC. Fifty-four patients with newly diagnosed IBC were offered infusional chemotherapy and 34 accepted. The schedule consisted of continuous infusional ECF (bolus epirubicin and cisplatin, substituted by carboplatin or cyclophosphamide in some patients) plus continuous 5-FU, given three weekly for six cycles. Following chemotherapy patients went on to have surgery and/or radiotherapy. The chemotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in an overall response rate of 79% with 35% of patients achieving a complete clinical response. The median response duration, time to progression and overall survival were 12 months (4-89+ months), 12 months (4-89+ months) and 23 months (7-89+ months), respectively. Patients had a 5 year disease free and overall survival of 11% and 29%, respectively. Infusional ECF is well tolerated and achieves a high clinical response rate in patients with IBC, but survival results do not appear to be superior to those achieved with conventional bolus chemotherapy schedules.

Pre-operative chemotherapy in early stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized feasibility study justifying a multicentre phase III trial.

Surgical resection offers the best chance for cure for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, stage I, II, IIIA), but the 5-year survival rates are only moderate, with systemic relapse being the major cause of death. Pre-operative (neo-adjuvant) chemotherapy has shown promise in small trials restricted to stage IIIA patients. We believe similar trials are now appropriate in all stages of operable lung cancer. A feasibility study was performed in 22 patients with early stage (IB, II, IIIA) resectable NSCLC; randomized to either three cycles of chemotherapy [mitomycin-C 8 mg m(-2), vinblastine 6 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) (MVP)] followed by surgery (n = 11), or to surgery alone. Of 40 eligible patients, 22 agreed to participate (feasibility 55%) and all complied with the full treatment schedule. All symptomatic patients achieved either complete (50%) or partial (50%) relief of tumour-related symptoms with pre-operative chemotherapy. Fifty-five per cent achieved objective tumour response, and a further 27% minor tumour shrinkage; none had progressive disease. Partial pathological response was seen in 50%. No severe (WHO grade III-IV) toxicities occurred. No significant deterioration in quality of life was detected during chemotherapy. Pre-operative MVP chemotherapy is feasible in early stage NSCLC, and this study has now been initiated as a UK-wide Medical Research Council phase III trial.