Gcn5 and Rpd3 have a limited role in the regulation of cell cycle transcripts during the G1 and S phases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Activation of cell cycle regulated transcription during the G1-to-S transition initiates S phase entry and cell cycle commitment. The molecular mechanisms involving G1/S transcriptional regulation are well established and have been shown to be evolutionary conserved from yeast to humans. Previous work has suggested that changes to the chromatin state, specifically through histone acetylation, has an important role in the regulation of G1/S transcription in both yeast and human cells. Here we investigate the role of histone acetylation in G1/S transcriptional regulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our work shows that histone acetylation at specific sites at G1/S target gene promoters peaks at the G1-to-S transition, coinciding with their peak transcription levels. Acetylation at G1/S target promoters is significantly reduced upon deletion of the previously implicated histone acetyltransferase Gcn5, but G1/S cell cycle regulated transcription is largely unaffected. The histone deacetylase Rpd3, suggested to have a role in Whi5-dependent repression, is required for full repression of G1/S target genes in the G1 and S phases. However, in the context of transcriptionally active levels during the G1-to-S transition, this seems to play a minor role in the regulation of cell cycle transcription. Our data suggests that histone acetylation might modulate the amplitude of G1/S cell cycle regulated transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but has a limited role in its overall regulation.

DNA replication checkpoint promotes G1-S transcription by inactivating the MBF repressor Nrm1.

The cell cycle transcriptional program imposes order on events of the cell-cycle and is a target for signals that regulate cell-cycle progression, including checkpoints required to maintain genome integrity. Neither the mechanism nor functional significance of checkpoint regulation of the cell-cycle transcription program are established. We show that Nrm1, an MBF-specific transcriptional repressor acting at the transition from G(1) to S phase of the cell cycle, is at the nexus between the cell cycle transcriptional program and the DNA replication checkpoint in fission yeast. Phosphorylation of Nrm1 by the Cds1 (Chk2) checkpoint protein kinase, which is activated in response to DNA replication stress, promotes its dissociation from the MBF transcription factor. This leads to the expression of genes encoding components that function in DNA replication and repair pathways important for cell survival in response to arrested DNA replication.

Plasma renin and prorenin and renin gene variation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: The most striking abnormality in the renin angiotensin system in diabetic nephropathy (DN) is increased plasma prorenin. Renin is thought to be low or normal in DN. In spite of altered (pro)renin regulation the renin gene has not been studied for contribution to the development of DN. METHODS: We studied plasma renin, prorenin, and four polymorphic markers of the renin gene in 199 patients with IDDM and DN, and in 192 normoalbuminuric IDDM controls matched for age, sex, and duration of diabetes. Plasma renin and total renin were measured by immunoradiometric assays. Genotyping was PCR-based. RESULTS: Plasma renin was increased in patients with nephropathy (median (range), 26.3 (5.2-243.3) vs 18.3 (4.2-373.5) microU/ml in the normoalbuminuric group, P<0.0001). Prorenin levels were elevated out of proportion to renin levels in nephropathic patients (789 (88-5481) vs 302 (36-2226) microU/ml, P<0.0001). Proliferative retinopathy had an additive effect on plasma prorenin, but not on renin. DN was associated with a BglI RFLP in the first intron of the renin gene (bb-genotype: n=106 vs 82 in DN and normoalbuminuric patients respectively, P=0.037), but not with three other polymorphisms in the renin gene. A trend for association of higher prorenin levels with the DN-associated allele of this renin polymorphism was observed in a subgroup of patients with DN (bb vs Bb+BB, P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that in DN there is an increase in both renin and prorenin levels. A renin gene polymorphism may contribute weakly to DN. Although speculative, one of the renin gene alleles could lead to increased renin gene expression, leading to higher renin and prorenin levels. These may play a role in the pathogenesis of DN.

Prediction-based threading of the hMSH2 DNA mismatch repair protein.

Mutations in the genes whose products participate in DNA mismatch repair underlie the increased risk of cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon carcinoma. Mutations in hMSH2 account for approximately 50% of the mutations found in these families. We sought to predict the 3-dimensional structure of hMSH2 by identifying structural homologues using prediction-based threading and by computer modeling using information from these putative structurally related proteins. Prediction-based threading identified three candidate structural homologues: glycogen phosphorylase (gpb), a 70 kDa soluble lytic transglycosylase, and ribonucleotide reductase protein R1. An independent approach utilizing a potential-based threading program also identified gpb as a structural homologue. The models based on the structures of these proteins suggest that the ATP binding domain and helix-turn-helix domain are exposed on the outside of the protein. All known bacterial MutS and hMSH2 mutations appear to be clustered in similar vicinities in the theoretical models of hMSH2; the major site is within the ATP binding domain and near the carboxyl-terminal end, whereas a smaller number map to the region coding for exon 5 and the amino-terminal domain. All point mutations also appear to affect amino acids that are exposed on the outside surface of the protein.