ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Stable isotope analysis of O2 is a valuable tool to identify O2 -consuming processes in the environment; however, reference materials for O2 isotope analysis are lacking. Consequently, a one-point calibration with O2 from ambient air is often applied, which can lead to substantial measurement uncertainties. Our goals were to develop a simple multipoint isotope-ratio calibration approach and to determine measurement errors of δ18 O and δ17 O values of O2 associated with a one-point calibration. METHODS: We produced O2 photosynthetically with extracted spinach thylakoids from source waters with δ18 O values of -56 to +95 and δ17 O values of -30 to +46. Photosynthesis was chosen because this process does not cause isotopic fractionation, so that the O isotopic composition of the produced O2 will be identical to that of the source water. The δ18 O and δ17 O values of the produced O2 were measured by gas chromatography coupled with isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS), applying a common one-point calibration. RESULTS: Linear regressions between δ18 O or δ17 O values of the produced O2 and those of the corresponding source waters resulted in slopes of 0.99 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.10, respectively. In the tested δ range, a one-point calibration thus introduced maximum errors of 0.8 and 3.3 for δ18 O and δ17 O, respectively. Triple oxygen isotopic measurements of O2 during consumption by Fe2+ resulted in a δ18 O-δ17 O relationship (λ) of 0.49 ± 0.01 without δ scale correction, slightly lower than expected for mass-dependent O isotopic fractionation. CONCLUSIONS: No significant bias is introduced on the δ18 O scale when applying a one-point calibration with O2 from ambient air during O2 isotope analysis. Both O2 formation and consumption experiments, however, indicate a δ17 O scale compression. Consequently, δ17 O values cannot be measured accurately by GC/IRMS with a one-point calibration without determining the δ17 O scale correction factor, e.g. with the O2 formation experiments described here.
ABSTRACT
The ubiquitous chlorophyll a (Chl a) pigment absorbs both blue and red light. Yet, in contrast to green algae and higher plants, most cyanobacteria have much lower photosynthetic rates in blue than in red light. A plausible but not yet well-supported hypothesis is that blue light results in limited energy transfer to photosystem II (PSII), because cyanobacteria invest most Chl a in photosystem I (PSI), whereas their phycobilisomes (PBS) are mostly associated with PSII but do not absorb blue photons. In this paper, we compare the photosynthetic performance in blue and orange-red light of wildtype Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and a PBS-deficient mutant. Our results show that the wildtype had much lower biomass, Chl a content, PSI:PSII ratio and O2 production rate per PSII in blue light than in orange-red light, whereas the PBS-deficient mutant had a low biomass, Chl a content, PSI:PSII ratio, and O2 production rate per PSII in both light colors. More specifically, the wildtype displayed a similar low photosynthetic efficiency in blue light as the PBS-deficient mutant in both light colors. Our results demonstrate that the absorption of light energy by PBS and subsequent transfer to PSII are crucial for efficient photosynthesis in cyanobacteria, which may explain both the low photosynthetic efficiency of PBS-containing cyanobacteria and the evolutionary success of chlorophyll-based light-harvesting antennae in environments dominated by blue light.
