Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 17(2): 119-24, 2016 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27206999

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the push-out bond strength (BS) of direct anatomic posts (DAPs) and conventional fiber posts (CFPs) cemented with different luting agents in different thirds of flared root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 human single-rooted canine teeth were transversally sectioned 16 mm from the radicular apex. After endodontic treatment, canals were flared with diamond burs. Samples were divided into six groups according to post type and luting agent: DAP and RelyX U100 (RXU); DAP and RelyX ARC (RXA); DAP and RelyX Luting 2 (RXL); CFP and RXU; CFP and RXA; CFP and RXL. Roots were sectioned transversely into six 1-mm-thick slices. The push-out test was performed and failure modes were observed. RESULTS: The DAP groups (7.23 ± 2.05) showed highest BS values (p < 0.05) when compared with CFP (5.93 ± 1.76). RelyX U100 (8.17 ± 1.70) showed higher BS values (p < 0.05) than RXA (6.46 ± 1.38), and RXL (5.10 ± 1.65) showed the lowest values. Bond strength on the apical third was statistically lower (p < 0.05) than that on the other thirds of the root canals. There was a predominance of adhesive failure for all groups. CONCLUSION: The DAPs improved retention in flared root canals, and RXU was the most effective luting agent. The apical third showed the lowest BS values. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The relining procedure of fiber posts with composite and the proper selection of luting resin cement are important for increasing bonding effectiveness in flared root canals.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements , Dental Restoration, Permanent/instrumentation , Glass , Composite Resins , Cuspid , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Post and Core Technique , Root Canal Preparation , Tooth Root
2.
Gen Dent ; 61(5): 40-2, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23928437

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effect of different ultrasonic vibration protocols on custom cast post-and-cores' retention to the root canal. Post holes were placed in the root canals of human maxillary canines, and post-and-core sets were luted, using zinc phosphate cement. The samples were divided into 5 groups (n = 8). Group 1 (control) received no ultrasonic vibration. For the other samples, the tip of the ultrasonic device was positioned either over the incisal face of the core (Group 2), over the lateral core surfaces and close to the incisal edge (Group 3), over the lateral face of the core but close to the line of cementation (Group 4), or over the lateral face of the core but with the end of the mouth mirror handle positioned on the opposite surface of the core (Group 5). After a tensile test, data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (P < 0.05). The control group showed higher values than all of the groups that were submitted to ultrasonic vibration. Bond strength was similar for Groups 2 and 3. Bond strength was lower in Groups 4 and 5; no statistical difference was observed between these 2 groups. Based on these results, both positioning the tip of the ultrasonic device near the cement line and placing a mouth mirror handle on the opposite surface of the core, are effective ways to reduce the retention of a cast post-and-core within a root canal.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Dental Pulp Cavity/pathology , Post and Core Technique/instrumentation , Cementation/methods , Chromium Alloys/chemistry , Cuspid/pathology , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Humans , Humidity , Materials Testing , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Ultrasonics , Vibration , Zinc Phosphate Cement/chemistry
3.
Braz Dent J ; 15(1): 36-40, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15322643

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the cleaning capacity of Profile.04 instruments with different concentrations of NaOCl solutions on flattened root canals. Twenty central mandibular incisors were divided into 4 groups: Group I: 0.5% NaOCl; Group II: 1% NaOCl; Group III: 5% NaOCl; Group IV: distilled and deionized water. After chemomechanical preparation, the teeth were submitted to histological preparation and morphometric analysis. Morphometric analysis showed that the 5% NaOCl was significantly more efficient in cleaning the root canal than 0.5% NaOCl and distilled water, which had the lowest levels of cleaning of the root canals (p<0.01).


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity/pathology , Root Canal Irrigants/administration & dosage , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Sodium Hypochlorite/administration & dosage , Dental Alloys , Dentin/pathology , Equipment Design , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Nickel , Solubility , Stainless Steel , Time Factors , Titanium , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...