Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Respirology ; 21(8): 1472-1479, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27417291

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of age and comorbidities, smoking and alcohol use on microorganisms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was performed with 4304 patients. We compared microbiological results, bacterial aetiology, smoking, alcohol abuse and comorbidities in three age groups: young adults (<45 years), adults (45-64 years) and seniors (>65 years). RESULTS: Bacterial aetiology was identified in 1522 (35.4%) patients. In seniors, liver disease was independently associated with Gram-negative bacteria (Haemophilus influenzae and Enterobacteriaceae), COPD with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR = 2.69 (1.46-4.97)) and Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 2.8 (1.24-6.3)) and neurological diseases with S. aureus. In adults, diabetes mellitus (DM) was a risk factor for Streptococcus pneumoniae and S. aureus, and COPD for H. influenzae (OR = 3.39 (1.06-10.83)). In young adults, DM was associated with S. aureus. Smoking was a risk factor for Legionella pneumophila regardless of age. Alcohol intake was associated with mixed aetiology and Coxiella burnetii in seniors, and with S. pneumoniae in young adults. CONCLUSION: It should be considered that the bacterial aetiology may differ according to the patient's age, comorbidities, smoking and alcohol abuse. More extensive microbiological testing is warranted in those with risk factors for infrequent microorganisms.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Haemophilus influenzae/isolation & purification , Pneumonia, Bacterial , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Sputum/microbiology
2.
Crit Care ; 18(3): R127, 2014 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950659

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Inherited variability in host immune responses influences susceptibility and outcome of Influenza A virus (IAV) infection, but these factors remain largely unknown. Components of the innate immune response may be crucial in the first days of the infection. The collectins surfactant protein (SP)-A1, -A2, and -D and mannose-binding lectin (MBL) neutralize IAV infectivity, although only SP-A2 can establish an efficient neutralization of poorly glycosylated pandemic IAV strains. METHODS: We studied the role of polymorphic variants at the genes of MBL (MBL2), SP-A1 (SFTPA1), SP-A2 (SFTPA2), and SP-D (SFTPD) in 93 patients with H1N1 pandemic 2009 (H1N1pdm) infection. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that two frequent SFTPA2 missense alleles (rs1965708-C and rs1059046-A) and the SFTPA2 haplotype 1A(0) were associated with a need for mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The SFTPA2 haplotype 1A(1) was a protective variant. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression also showed that diplotypes not containing the 1A(1) haplotype were associated with a significantly shorter time to ICU admission in hospitalized patients. In addition, rs1965708-C (P = 0.0007), rs1059046-A (P = 0.0007), and haplotype 1A(0) (P = 0.0004) were associated, in a dose-dependent fashion, with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio, whereas haplotype 1A(1) was associated with a higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest an effect of genetic variants of SFTPA2 on the severity of H1N1pdm infection and could pave the way for a potential treatment with haplotype-specific (1A(1)) SP-A2 for future IAV pandemics.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/genetics , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A/genetics , Adult , Blood Pressure , Female , Haplotypes , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza, Human/physiopathology , Male , Mutation, Missense , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
3.
PLoS One ; 7(5): e37570, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22629420

ABSTRACT

Initial care has been associated with improved survival of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to investigate patient comorbidities and health status measured by the Charlson index and clinical signs at diagnosis associated with adherence to recommended processes of care in CAP. We studied 3844 patients hospitalized with CAP. The evaluated recommendations were antibiotic adherence to Spanish guidelines, first antibiotic dose <6 hours and oxygen assessment. Antibiotic adherence was 72.6%, first dose <6 h was 73.4% and oxygen assessment was 90.2%. Antibiotic adherence was negatively associated with a high Charlson score (Odds ratio [OR], 0.91), confusion (OR, 0.66) and tachycardia ≥100 bpm (OR, 0.77). Delayed first dose was significantly lower in those with tachycardia (OR, 0.75). Initial oxygen assessment was negatively associated with fever (OR, 0.61), whereas tachypnea ≥30 (OR, 1.58), tachycardia (OR, 1.39), age >65 (OR, 1.51) and COPD (OR, 1.80) were protective factors. The combination of antibiotic adherence and timing <6 hours was negatively associated with confusion (OR, 0.69) and a high Charlson score (OR, 0.92) adjusting for severity and hospital effect, whereas age was not an independent factor. Deficient health status and confusion, rather than age, are associated with lower compliance with antibiotic therapy recommendations and timing, thus identifying a subpopulation more prone to receiving lower quality care.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals/standards , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Health Status , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Spain , Treatment Outcome
4.
Crit Care Med ; 39(6): 1388-93, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21317643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential association of the functional polymorphism rs1801274 in the receptor IIa for the Fc portion of immunoglobin G (FcγRIIa) gene (FCGR2A-H131R) with the susceptibility to and the severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: Multicenter prospective and observational study. SETTING: Four university hospitals in Spain. PATIENTS: FCGR2A-H131R polymorphism was determined in 1,262 patients with CAP and in 1,224 in the subject control group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Severe sepsis was recorded in 366 patients. No significant differences in genotype or allele frequencies were seen among patients with CAP or pneumococcal CAP (PCAP) and controls. Patients with bacteremic PCAP (B-PCAP) had significantly higher frequencies of FCGR2A-H/H131 genotypes than those with nonbacteremic PCAP (p = .00016, odds ratio = 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.3). The differences remained significant when adjusting for pneumonia severity index, hospital of origin, and intensive care unit admission (p = .0012, odds ratio = 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.51-5.32). B-PCAP was associated with a significantly higher severity of the disease, evaluated as sepsis severity (p = .000007, odds ratio = 4.40, 95% confidence interval 2.31-8.39), multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (0.00048, odds ratio = 3.29, 95% confidence interval 1.69-6.41), intensive care unit admission, acute renal failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support a role of FCGR2A-H131R polymorphism in susceptibility to CAP or PCAP. However, we provide the insight that homozygosity for FCGR2A-H131 predisposes B-PCAP, which was associated with higher severity in our study.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/genetics , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Receptors, IgG/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 45(2): 92-9, 2009 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19232271

ABSTRACT

Given the movement of medical specialists across borders in recent years, and the changes in legislation affecting the structure and operation of boards responsible for the various medical specialties, the task of harmonizing the training of respiratory medicine residents across the European Union has become crucial. The project for Harmonized Education in Respiratory Medicine for European Specialists (HERMES) is a collective response to this need. After 3 years of work toward building consensus, HERMES is entering its second phase. The Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) has the aim of informing our resident trainees, their instructors, and others concerned with postgraduate education in respiratory medicine in Spain about this undeniably difficult task of harmonization.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Pulmonary Medicine/education , Europe , Spain
6.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 9(2): 229-41, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18201146

ABSTRACT

Streptococcus pneumoniae has been consistently shown to represent the most frequent causative agent of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and pneumococcal antibiotic resistance towards different families of antibiotics continues to be a much-debated issue. Microbial resistance causes a great deal of confusion in choosing an empirical treatment for pneumonia and this makes it necessary to know which factors actually determine the real impact of antimicrobial resistance on the outcome of pneumococcal infections. Several different aspects have to be taken into account when analyzing this matter, such as the study design, the condition of the patient at the time of diagnosis, the choice of the initial antimicrobial regimen (combination or monotherapy) and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variables of the chosen antibiotic. It is generally accepted that in the treatment of beta-lactam-resistant pneumococcal infections, the use of standard antipneumococcal beta-lactam agents is unlikely to impact negatively on the outcome of CAP when appropriate agents are given in sufficient doses. As a general rule, for infections with penicillin-sensitive strains, penicillin or an aminopenicillin in a standard dosage will be effective; in the cases of strains with intermediate resistance, beta-lactam agents are still considered appropriate treatment although higher dosages are recommended; finally, infections with isolates of high-level penicillin resistance should be treated with alternative agents such as the third-generation cephalosporins or the new antipneumococcal fluoroquinolones. In areas of high prevalence of high-level macrolide resistance, empirical monotherapy with a macrolide is not optimal for the treatment of hospitalised patients with moderate or moderately-severe CAP. Fluoroquinolones are considered to be excellent antibiotics in the treatment of pneumococcal CAP in adults, but their general recommendation has been withheld due to fears of a widespread development of resistance. Most international guidelines recommend combination therapy (beta-lactam plus a macrolide) for the treatment of hospitalised patients with CAP.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Disease Management , Drug Resistance, Microbial/physiology , Humans , Pneumonia/microbiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/physiology
8.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 29(1): 20-5, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16343923

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It has been hypothesized that medical procedures performed in high-volume units carry less risk and achieve a better outcome. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the number of interventions and the operative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival in the surgery of bronchogenic carcinoma (BC). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective, multicenter Spanish study was conducted in 19 departments of thoracic surgery on 2994 patients operated on consecutively with the aim of curing BC. The thoracic surgery departments have been classified into three groups, according to the number of interventions performed per year: I (1-43 cases/year; centers=7; n=565; 18.9%), II (44-54 cases/year; centers=6; n=1044; 34.9%) and III (55 or more cases/year; centers=6; n=1385; 46.3%). RESULTS: When the three groups were compared, the frequency of complete surgery was found to be 84% for group I, 76% for group II and 83% for group III (p=0.001, for comparisons between groups I/II and II/III). The pathological stages were identical in the three groups. The overall morbidity and the mortality in all patients or above the age of 75 or in pneumonectomies were not different among the groups. When considering all the patients with prognostic information (n=2758), no differences were found regarding the 5-year survival among the groups. When only patients in postoperative stage I-II and complete resection were evaluated, excluding operative mortality (n=1128), 5-year survival was 0.58 for group I, 0.57 for group II and 0.50 for group III (p=0.06 between groups II and III; p=0.08 between groups I and III). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences that do not favor the hypothesis that there is increased surgical risk and worse survival in centers having a lower volume were found in this Spanish multicenter study.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Bronchogenic/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thoracotomy/mortality , Aged , Carcinoma, Bronchogenic/mortality , Carcinoma, Bronchogenic/surgery , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Morbidity , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Survival Analysis , Thoracotomy/adverse effects , Thoracotomy/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
9.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 172(6): 757-62, 2005 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15937289

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Some studies highlight the association of better clinical responses with adherence to guidelines for empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but little is known about factors that influence this adherence. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to identify factors influencing adherence to the guidelines for empiric treatment of CAP, and to evaluate the impact of adherence on outcome. METHODS: We studied 1,288 patients with CAP admitted to 13 Spanish hospitals. Collected variables included the patients' clinical and demographic data, initial severity of the disease, antibiotic treatment, and specialty and training status of the prescribing physician. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Adherence to guidelines was high (79.7%), with significant differences between hospitals (range, 47-97%) and physicians (pneumologists, 81%; pneumology residents, 84%; nonpneumology residents, 82%; other specialists, 67%). The independent factors related to higher adherence were hospital, physician characteristics, and initial high-risk class of Fine, whereas admission to intensive care unit decreased adherence. Seventy-four patients died (6.1%), and treatment failure was found in 175 patients (14.2%). After adjusting for Fine risk class, adherence to the guidelines was found protective for mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.9) and for treatment failure (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9). Treatment prescribed by pneumologists and residents was associated with lower treatment failure (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to guidelines mainly depends on the hospital and the specialty and training status of prescribing physicians. Nonadherence was higher in nonpneumology specialists, and is an independent risk factor for treatment failure and mortality.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Guideline Adherence , Guidelines as Topic , Pneumonia/therapy , Hospitals , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Internship and Residency , Logistic Models , Physicians , Pneumonia/mortality , Pulmonary Medicine , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
10.
Am J Respir Med ; 2(1): 39-54, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14720021

ABSTRACT

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a life-threatening condition that requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Clinical presentation is characterized by the presence of respiratory failure, severe sepsis, or septic shock. Severe CAP accounts for approximately 5-35% of hospital-treated cases of pneumonia with the majority of patients having underlying comorbidities. The most common pathogens associated with this disease are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella spp., Haemophilus influenzae, and Gram-negative enteric rods. Microbial investigation is probably helpful in the individual case but is likely to be more useful for defining local antimicrobial policies. The early and rapid initiation of empiric antimicrobial treatment is critical for a favorable outcome. It should include intravenous beta-lactam along with either a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone. Modifications of this basic regimen should be considered in the presence of distinct comorbid conditions and risk factors for specific pathogens. Other promising nonantimicrobial new therapies are currently being investigated. The assessment of severity of CAP helps physicians to identify patients who could be managed safely in an ambulatory setting. It may also play a crucial role in decisions about length of hospital stay and time of switching to oral antimicrobial therapy in different groups at risk. The most important adverse prognostic factors include advancing age, male sex, poor health of patient, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis, septic shock, progressive radiographic course, bacteremia, signs of disease progression within the first 48-72 hours, and the presence of several different pathogens such as S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Gram-negative enteric bacilli, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, some important topics of severity assessment remain controversial, including the definition of severe CAP. Prediction rules for complications or death from CAP, although far from perfect, should identify the majority of patients with severe CAP and be used to support decision-making by the physician. They may also contribute to the evaluation of processes and outcomes of care for patients with CAP.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Disease Progression , Humans , Incidence , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...