Central lead administration inhibits water intake and sodium appetite in rats.

We have demonstrated that acute third ventricle injections of lead acetate (PbAc) exert a powerful antidipsogenic effect and induce a significant increase in renal sodium excretion. In the present study we confirm the antidipsogenic effect of lead and demonstrate that central administration of this metal, in minute amounts, significantly reduces salt intake both during dehydration and after central angiotensinergic stimulation. Adult male Wistar rats had the third ventricle cannulated seven days before the experiments. During this period they had free access to distilled water and hypertonic saline solution (1.5%). After a 24-h period of fluid deprivation, experimental animals received third ventricle injections of PbAc (0.3, N = 8 and 3.0 nmol/rat, N = 14) while controls received sodium acetate (NaAc; 3.0 nmol/rat, N = 10). Rats treated with PbAc at the highest dose showed a significant reduction (P<0.05) both in water and hypertonic saline intake when compared to controls. When the effect of lead administration on angiotensin II-induced water and salt intake was studied, normohydrated animals received third ventricle injections of angiotensin II (9.6 nmol/rat) after pretreatment with 3.0 nmol/rat of PbAc (experimental group, N = 10) or NaAc (controls, N = 8). The group pretreated with PbAc presented a significant reduction (P<0.05) in both water and salt intake compared to controls. Thus, this study confirms the antidipsogenic effect of central lead injections and demonstrates that the presence of lead in the brain exerts a significant inhibition of sodium appetite.

Is there a relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and their clinical efficacy? An analysis of studies design and methodology.

There are now more than 50 studies concerning neuroleptic blood levels and clinical outcome relationships. Haloperidol, the most studied, is the only antipsychotic permitting some conclusions. A number of authors suggest that the striking lack of agreement between different studies results from heterogeneity of their quality. Here, we have used a scoring system for assessing the quality of those studies. According to this system, none (0/14) of the studies having a score < 0.60 was able to show a therapeutic window, as compared to 53% (10/19) of those having a score > or = 0.60 (p = 0.002, Fisher exact test). Also, the studies able to identify the presence of a therapeutic window during haloperidol treatment were those having sample size > 20 (p = 0.06) and those whose patients were treated with fixed doses (p = 0.02). The diagnosis of schizophrenia in the studies seems not to be an exclusive condition, as compared with those also including schizophreniform and schizoaffective disorders (p = 0.12). Our qualitative analysis of haloperidol blood level publications seem to indicate that an upper limit may exist for haloperidol efficacy; values above this limit seem not to provide any supplementary clinical improvement and may even reduce therapeutic effect.

Central adrenoceptors and basal prolactin release in the rat.

The influence of the central adrenergic system on basal prolactin secretion was investigated in the rat. Several selective adrenoceptor blockers were centrally administered and their effects on prolactin secretion were observed. Blockade of beta-1 receptors by practolol, beta-2 receptors by IPS 339 and alpha-2 receptors by DG-5128 did not modify basal prolactin secretion, but alpha-1 adrenoceptor blockade by prazosin strongly enhanced prolactin plasma levels. These findings suggest that noradrenergic pathways in the central nervous system exert inhibitory tone on basal prolactin secretion, and that this effect seems to be mediated by alpha-1 adrenoceptors.