ABSTRACT
In premenopausal women treated for breast cancer, endocrine therapy combining an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (GA) for ovarian suppression may be indicated in high-risk or in metastatic cancer. AIs are effective in premenopausal women only when ovarian estrogen production is suppressed, a state achievable through the use of GAs. However, a complete suppression sometimes proves elusive. We report here three cases of ovarian suppression failure in premenopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant AI+GA. Frequency of GA administration, BMI, and young age could affect gonadotropin suppression and may be implied in these failures. Clinical monitoring of these patients is advisable, and hormone assays and pelvic ultrasound should be performed in case of symptoms of estrogen activity.
Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/pharmacology , Ovary/drug effects , Adult , Aromatase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/administration & dosage , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , HumansABSTRACT
The magnitude and the scope of health care problems posed by human prison inmates seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are enormous. Prisoners represent a substantial proportion of HIV-infected individuals in North America. A high proportion of prisoners are intravenous drug users who often have not received appropriate health care or HIV-directed services prior to incarceration. Health care of HIV-seropositive prisoners and follow-up medical care after prison release has often been less than optimal. Among inmates at the prison facility in Rhode Island, 4% of the men and 12% of the women are HIV seropositive. The Brown University medical community, in conjunction with the Rhode Island Department of Health and Corrections, has developed an effective program for the health care of such prisoners, both during incarceration and after release from prison. Academic medical centers are uniquely poised to assume the leading role in meeting this obligation. We believe that this general approach, with region-specific modifications, may be effectively applied in many correctional institutions in North America.
