Nitric oxide modulates tapentadol antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence.

Tapentadol, an analgesic with a dual mechanism of action, involving both µ-opioid receptor agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (MOP-NRI), was designed for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. However, the widely acknowledged risk of analgesic tolerance and development of physical dependence following sustained opioid use may hinder their effectiveness. One of the possible mechanisms behind these phenomena are alterations in nitric oxide synthase (NOS) system activity. The aim of the study was to investigate the tolerance and dependence potential of tapentadol in rodent models and to evaluate the possible role of nitric oxide (NO) in these processes. Our study showed that chronic tapentadol treatment resulted in tolerance to its antinociceptive effects to an extent similar to tramadol, but much less than morphine. A single injection of a non-selective NOS inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOArg), reversed the tapentadol tolerance. In dependence studies, repeated administration of L-NOArg attenuated naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in tapentadol-treated mice, whereas a single injection of L-NOArg was ineffective. Biochemical analysis revealed that tapentadol decreased nNOS protein levels in the dorsal root ganglia of rats following 31 days of treatment, while no significant changes were found in iNOS and eNOS protein expression. Moreover, pre-treatment with L-NOArg augmented tapentadol antinociception in an opioid- and α2-adrenoceptor-dependent manner. In conclusion, our data suggest that the NOS system plays an important role in the attenuation of tapentadol-induced tolerance and withdrawal. Thus, inhibition of NOS activity can serve as a promising treatment option for long-term tapentadol use by extending its effectiveness and improving the side-effects profile.

Insulin, but Not Metformin, Supports Wound Healing Process in Rats with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes.

PURPOSE: Optimal glycemic control is crucial for proper wound healing in patients with diabetes. However, it is not clear whether other antidiabetic drugs support wound healing in mechanisms different from the normalization of blood glucose control. We assessed the effect of insulin and metformin administration on the wound healing process in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 male Wistar rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. In the last phase of the study, 45 rats, with the most stable glucose levels in the range of 350-500 mg/dL, were divided into three groups: group I received human non-protamine insulin subcutaneously (5 IU/kg body mass) once a day, group II received metformin intragastrically (500 mg/kg b.m.), and group III (control) was given saline subcutaneously. After 14 days of antidiabetic treatment, a 2 cm × 2 cm thin layer of skin was cut from each rat's dorsum and a 4 cm disk with a hole in its center was sewn in to stabilize the skin and standardize the healing process. The wound healing process was followed up for 9 days, with assessment every 3 days. Biopsy samples were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical assays. RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed significant influence of treatment type (insulin, control, or metformin) on the relative change in wound surface area. The wound healing process in rats treated with insulin was more effective than in the metformin and control groups. Wound tissue samples taken from the insulin-treated animals presented significantly lower levels of inflammatory infiltration. Immunohistochemical assessment showed the greatest density of centers of proliferation Ki-67 in insulin-treated animals. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an insulin-based treatment is more beneficial than metformin, in terms of accelerating the wound healing process in an animal model of streptozocin-induced diabetes.

Disulfiram Abrogates Morphine Tolerance-A Possible Role of µ-Opioid Receptor-Related G-Protein Activation in the Striatum.

One of the key strategies for effective pain management involves delaying analgesic tolerance. Early clinical reports indicate an extraordinary effectiveness of off-label disulfiram-an agent designed for alcohol use disorder-in potentiating opioid analgesia and abrogation of tolerance. Our study aimed to determine whether sustained µ-opioid signaling upon disulfiram exposure contributes to these phenomena. Wistar rats were exposed to acute and chronic disulfiram and morphine cotreatment. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical Randal-Selitto and thermal tail-flick tests. µ-opioid receptor activation in brain structures important for pain processing was carried out with the [35S]GTPγS assay. The results suggest that disulfiram (12.5-50 mg/kg i.g.) augmented morphine antinociception and diminished morphine (25 mg/kg, i.g.) tolerance in a supraspinal, opioid-dependent manner. Disulfiram (25 mg/kg, i.g.) induced a transient enhancement of µ-opioid receptor activation in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex and the dorsal striatum at day 1 of morphine treatment. Disulfiram rescued µ-opioid receptor signaling in the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen 14 days following morphine and disulfiram cotreatment. The results of this study suggest that striatal µ-opioid receptors may contribute to the abolition of morphine tolerance following concomitant treatment with disulfiram.