Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Res ; 52(1): 56, 2021 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853678

ABSTRACT

ELISA methods are the diagnostic tools recommended for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in ruminants but their respective diagnostic performances are difficult to assess because of the absence of a gold standard. This study focused on three commercial ELISA tests with the following objectives (1) assess their sensitivity and specificity in sheep, goats and cattle, (2) assess the between- and within-herd seroprevalence distribution in these species, accounting for diagnostic errors, and (3) estimate optimal sample sizes considering sensitivity and specificity at herd level. We comparatively tested 1413 cattle, 1474 goat and 1432 sheep serum samples collected in France. We analyzed the cross-classified test results with a hierarchical zero-inflated beta-binomial latent class model considering each herd as a population and conditional dependence as a fixed effect. Potential biases and coverage probabilities of the model were assessed by simulation. Conditional dependence for truly seropositive animals was high in all species for two of the three ELISA methods. Specificity estimates were high, ranging from 94.8% [92.1; 97.8] to 99.2% [98.5; 99.7], whereas sensitivity estimates were generally low, ranging from 39.3 [30.7; 47.0] to 90.5% [83.3; 93.8]. Between- and within-herd seroprevalence estimates varied greatly among geographic areas and herds. Overall, goats showed higher within-herd seroprevalence levels than sheep and cattle. The optimal sample size maximizing both herd sensitivity and herd specificity varied from 3 to at least 20 animals depending on the test and ruminant species. This study provides better interpretation of three widely used commercial ELISA tests and will make it possible to optimize their implementation in future studies. The methodology developed may likewise be applied to other human or animal diseases.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Goat Diseases/diagnosis , Q Fever/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Goat Diseases/microbiology , Goats , Latent Class Analysis , Prevalence , Q Fever/diagnosis , Q Fever/epidemiology , Q Fever/microbiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Sheep, Domestic
2.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 66(3): 1202-1209, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30702810

ABSTRACT

Q fever is a zoonotic abortive disease of ruminants mostly transmitted by inhalation of aerosols contaminated by Coxiella burnetii. Clusters of cases or even epidemics regularly occur in humans but, to date, there is no consensus about the best way to carry out outbreak investigations in order to identify potential farms at risk. Although environmental samples might be useful during such investigations, there are few baseline data on the presence of C. burnetii in the environment of ruminant farms. We thus investigated dust samples from cattle, sheep and goat farm buildings in order to (a) estimate C. burnetii detection frequency and bacterial loads in the environment, and (b) determine whether this environmental contamination is associated with series of abortions attributed to Q fever. We considered 113 herds with a recent abortive episode potentially related (n = 60) or not (n = 53) to C. burnetii. Dust was sampled using a swab cloth and tested by a quantitative PCR method targeting the IS1111 gene. Coxiella burnetii DNA was detected on 9 of 50 cattle farms, 13 of 19 goat farms and 30 of 40 sheep farms. On 16 cloths, bacterial loads were higher than 108 genome equivalents, levels as high as in infectious materials such as placentas and aborted foetuses. Overall, the probability of detecting C. burnetii DNA was higher on small ruminant farms than cattle farms, in herds suspected of Q fever and in large herds. We conclude that swab cloths are a putative indicator of contamination of ruminant farms by C. burnetii.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Goat Diseases/microbiology , Q Fever/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Coxiella burnetii/genetics , Dust , Environmental Microbiology , Epidemics , Farms , Female , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Goats , Housing, Animal , Humans , Pregnancy , Q Fever/epidemiology , Q Fever/microbiology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/microbiology
3.
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol ; 64(1): 104-6, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22066485

ABSTRACT

A study was carried out to assess the efficacy of vaccination, using a phase I Coxiella burnetii-inactivated vaccine (Coxevac®; CEVA), within three goat herds experiencing Q fever abortions waves. The stratification of the population (n = 905) was based on parity and on infection status related to both serological and qPCR vaginal shedding results. Control (n = 443) and vaccinated (n = 462) groups were established in each farm. Vaccination was administered to does before mating and to kids after active immunity acquisition (at least 3­4 months old). The vaccine effectiveness was analyzed at subsequent farrowing on both clinical incidence and vaginal shedding at the delivery day. Among the 231 animals considered as susceptible, that is, seronegative nonshedders, about 90% were infected whatever the group, showing that vaccination did not prevent infection under high infection exposure. Fortunately, vaccination induced an overall decrease in shedding levels. A significant average difference between groups was estimated to 1.16 log(10) bacteria per swab for primiparous and even higher (1.81 log(10)) for initially susceptible ones. Thus, in a clinical context, vaccination should be implemented first in renewal animals. Indeed, young animals are those which best respond to vaccination by significantly reducing C. burnetii burden and, conversely, which excrete bacteria most massively if not vaccinated.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Coxiella burnetii/immunology , Goat Diseases/prevention & control , Q Fever/veterinary , Vaccination/methods , Animals , Bacterial Load , Bacterial Shedding , Female , Goats , Incidence , Q Fever/prevention & control , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vagina/microbiology
4.
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol ; 64(1): 120-2, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22066517

ABSTRACT

This study, carried out in three goat herds, was aimed at describing individual responses to Q fever infection in an abortive context, focusing on both antibody and shedding levels. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii (Cb) infection and vaginal shedding of 1083 goats were investigated using ELISA and realtime qPCR assays, respectively. At the end of the outbreaks, a seroprevalence of 45.0% was found, and vaginal shedding appeared massive with levels above 10(4) Cb per swab in 42.3% of the whole population and above 10(6) Cb per swab for 90.9% of aborted goats. Susceptible animals (i.e. seronegative nonshedders) were unfrequent (31.2%), most of them being kids (94.7%). Seronegative females were predominant among nonshedders and conversely seropositive ones, predominant among high shedders (above 10(6) Cb per swab). Nevertheless, at least 43.3% of seronegative goats shed bacteria confirming the need of interpreting serology on a herd scale. The subsequent farrowing period was characterized by a significant reduction in the number of clinical cases. Females that had already aborted were more often involved than others. Shedding quantities remained high, particularly for primiparous does, mainly when facing infection for the first time. Thus, Q fever control must be based on both preventive measures directed to the preherd and environmental precautions.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Shedding , Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Q Fever/veterinary , Vagina/microbiology , Animals , Antibody Formation , Coxiella burnetii/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Goat Diseases/immunology , Goat Diseases/microbiology , Goats , Q Fever/epidemiology , Q Fever/immunology , Q Fever/microbiology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
5.
Syst Appl Microbiol ; 30(7): 547-60, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17604934

ABSTRACT

The microbial communities in milks from one herd were evaluated during 1-year of lactation, using molecular methods to evaluate their stability and the effect of breeding conditions on their composition. The diversity of microbial communities was measured using two approaches: molecular identification by 16S and 18S rDNA sequencing of isolates from counting media (two milks), and direct identification using 16S rDNA from clone libraries (six milks). The stability of these communities was evaluated by counting on selective media and by Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of variable region V3 of the 16S rRNA gene and variable region V4 of the 18S rRNA gene. One hundred and eighteen milk samples taken throughout the year were analyzed. Wide diversity among bacteria and yeasts in the milk was revealed. In addition to species commonly encountered in milk, such as Lactococcus lactis, Lactococcus garvieae, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus casei, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus simulans, Staphylococcus caprae, Staphylococcus equorum, Micrococcus sp., Kocuria sp., Pantoea agglomerans and Pseudomonas putida, sequences were affiliated to other species only described in cheeses, such as Corynebacterium variabile, Arthrobacter sp., Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum, Clostridium sp. and Rothia sp. Several halophilic species atypical in milk were found, belonging to Jeotgalicoccus psychrophilus, Salinicoccus sp., Dietza maris, Exiguobacterium, Ornithinicoccus sp. and Hahella chejuensis. The yeast community was composed of Debaryomyces hansenii, Kluyveromyces lactis, Trichosporon beigelii, Rhodotorula glutinis, Rhodotorula minuta, Candida pararugosa, Candida intermedia, Candida inconspicua, Cryptococcus curvatus and Cryptococcus magnus. The analyses of microbial counts and microbial SSCP profiles both distinguished four groups of milks corresponding to four periods defined by season and feeding regime. The microbial community was stable within each period. Milks from winter were characterized by Lactococcus and Pseudomonas, those from summer by P. agglomerans and Klebsiella and those from autumn by Chryseobacterium indologenes, Acinetobacter baumanii, Staphylococcus, Corynebacteria and yeasts. However, the composition of the community can vary according to factors other than feeding. This study opens new investigation fields in the field of raw milk microbial ecology.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Biodiversity , Fungi/classification , Milk/microbiology , Animals , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Fungal/chemistry , DNA, Fungal/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Feeding Methods , Fungi/isolation & purification , Goats , Lactation , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , Seasons , Sequence Analysis, DNA
6.
Vet Res ; 34(5): 689-716, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14556701

ABSTRACT

Staphylococci are the main aetiological agents of small ruminants intramammary infections (IMI), the more frequent isolates being S. aureus in clinical cases and coagulase negative species in subclinical IMI. The clinical IMI, whose annual incidence is usually lower than 5%, mainly occur at the beginning of machine milking and during the first third of lactation. These features constitute small ruminant peculiarities compared to dairy cattle. Small ruminant mastitis is generally a chronic and contagious infection: the primary sources are mammary and cutaneous carriages, and spreading mainly occurs during milking. Somatic cell counts (SCC) represent a valuable tool for prevalence assessment and screening, but predictive values are better in ewes than in goats. Prevention is most often based on milking machine management, sanitation and annual control, and milking technique optimisation. Elimination mainly relies on culling animals exhibiting clinical, chronic and recurrent IMI, and on drying-off intramammary antibiotherapy; this treatment allows a good efficacy and may be used selectively by targeting infected udders only. Heritability values for lactation mean SCC scores are between 0.11 and 0.15. Effective inclusion of ewe's mastitis resistance in the breeding goal has recently been implemented in France following experimental and large scale estimations of genetic parameters for SCC scores.


Subject(s)
Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Mastitis/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Cell Count/veterinary , Female , Goat Diseases/diagnosis , Goat Diseases/prevention & control , Goats , Lactation/physiology , Mastitis/diagnosis , Mastitis/epidemiology , Mastitis/prevention & control , Milk/cytology , Parity , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/diagnosis , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...