ABSTRACT
Background Preoperative localization of the parathyroid gland prior to a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is important because of varying locations of the parathyroid gland. Several methods have been described to localize the affected gland. One novel technique is the use of an iodine 125 (I-125) seed as a marker. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using an I-125 seed in localizing the diseased parathyroid gland prior to MIP. Materials and methods This is a pilot study of 10 patients performed in the Amphia Hospital, the Netherlands. Patients in whom primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) was diagnosed in combination with 1 enlarged parathyroid gland on ultrasound (US) and scintigraphy and who were eligible for MIP were included in this study. These patients underwent a preoperative US-guided I-125 seed placement in the affected parathyroid gland. The main study parameters were the feasibility of the placement, intraoperative localization of the diseased gland and complications. Results A total of 10 patients were included. The US-guided I-125 placement in the affected parathyroid gland was technically feasible in the majority of cases. Because of the anatomical location of the gland, the placement was difficult in 2 patients, resulting in suboptimal position and possible misplacement of the marker. MIP was uncomplicated in most cases. Complications during surgery were mainly intraoperative bleeding. Conclusions The use of an I-125 seed for preoperative localization in PHPT is a relatively safe technique in parathyroid surgery. More research is needed to compare this technique with other preoperative localization techniques.
Subject(s)
Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/diagnostic imaging , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/surgery , Iodine Radioisotopes , Parathyroidectomy/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Netherlands , Pilot Projects , Preoperative Care/methods , Radionuclide Imaging/methods , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methodsABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Purpose/Aim of study: To compare the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) versus visualization of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) alone in thyroid surgery with regard to incidence in postoperative RLN injury and operation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed in the Amphia Hospital, the Netherlands. All thyroid gland operations were collected from September 2009 to October 2012. For each case we recorded the patient characteristics, indication for surgery, intraoperative data, complications, results of pathological evaluation, and consultation of a ENT-surgeon. Research of current literature and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: In total, 147 patients were included and classified into an IONM and non-IONM group. Both groups were similar in demographical aspects and indications for surgery. In total, we had 170 nerves at risk (NAR). In both groups, there were 85 (50%) NAR. Overall injury to the RLN was 6%. A statistical significant decrease of permanent RLN injuries was noticed in the IONM group compared to the non-IONM group (n = 0 vs n = 6; p = .044). In transient RLN injury, no difference was noticed (n = 2 vs n = 2). Operation time with or without IONM was not significantly different for hemithyroidectomies, neither for total thyroidectomies. CONCLUSION: IONM is a useful tool as an adjunct in thyroid surgery to prevent RLN injury. A statistical significant decrease in permanent RLN injury with the use of IONM was found, but it did not significantly decrease time of operation.
