Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 25(2): e59-e75, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336527

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To search for studies that address the efficacy of nonpharmacologic methods for pain relief in adults undergoing cardiac surgeries. DESIGN: A systematic review registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42020168681. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, LILACS, CINAHL, the Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS: The review used a PRISMA guideline that selected primary randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of nonpharmacologic pain relief therapies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with no time or language restrictions. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Clinical Trials was used to assess methodological rigor. RESULTS: After screening, 23 of the 140 studies found in the databases were selected. The studies examined the efficacy of 13 different nonpharmacologic therapies, as well as a combination of therapies, with massage therapy being the most commonly examined, followed by musical intervention and hypnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Some interventions, when combined with pharmacologic therapy, were effective in relieving postoperative pain after cardiac surgeries, according to the studies analyzed. However, most studies had significant methodological flaws, and further studies with high methodological quality are needed.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Pain, Postoperative , Adult , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
2.
Trials ; 23(1): 278, 2022 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35410256

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain are frequent in cardiac surgeries and constitute important stressors for patients, which can cause several complications. One strategy that aims to alleviate these phenomena is listening to music as a non-pharmacological intervention. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of listening to music on preoperative state-anxiety, postoperative pain, at rest and when instructed to cough, and cardiorespiratory parameters in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A randomized, parallel, simple masking clinical trial will be conducted with patients 18 years of age or older who have undergone elective cardiac surgery by sternotomy, who agree to participate in the research and sign a free and informed consent form. Study participants will be randomly divided, in a 1:1 ratio, to one of the two groups: experimental (subjected to listening to music for 20 min in the pre- and postoperative period) or control (standard care in the pre- and postoperative period), using a randomization scheme generated by the Randomization.com website. The sample size calculation was obtained after conducting a pilot study. DISCUSSION: The results of the study may contribute to the implementation of non-pharmacological interventions in health services, highlighting the protocols for listening to music, to minimize anxiety and pain in cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ReBEC RBR-8mdyhd . Posted on December 10, 2019.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Music Therapy , Music , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/prevention & control , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Music Therapy/methods , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv ; 4: 100078, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745606

ABSTRACT

Background: : Medical adhesive-related skin injury can occur during health care. Professionals must adopt preventive measures to maintain the integrity of the skin and patient comfort and safety. Objective: : To map the existing scientific evidence on preventing medical adhesive-related skin injury in adults. Design: : Scoping Review. Methods: : Searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase®, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Google Scholar, without period delimitation. Duplicate studies and those that didn´t answer the research question were excluded. Results: : Of the 209 studies identified in the search process, 30 made up the final sample. The prevention of injury by adhesives mainly involves identifying risk factors, proper adhesive selection, and correct application and removal. Health education and medical records about injuries related to medical adhesives are essential. Conclusions: : The prevention of medical adhesive-related skin injury should be done by adopting multifactorial measures, which range from identifying risk factors and correct handling of adhesives to the process of educating professionals, patients and communities about these injuries. Registration: : The research was registered on the Open Science Framework DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/NSWP8.

4.
J Clin Nurs ; 28(21-22): 3807-3816, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31323697

ABSTRACT

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To identify the occurrence of skin and mucosal lesions and factors related to the use of medical devices in newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. BACKGROUND: The use of medical devices increases the risk of injury in newborns due to the immaturity and fragility of their skin and mucosa. DESIGN: Observational and longitudinal study. METHODS: The study included 85 newborns admitted to in a neonatal intensive care unit from a public teaching hospital. Data were collected from February-August 2018. For the evaluation, the Neonatal Skin Condition Score was used, as well as an instrument covering sociodemographic and clinical variables, medical devices in use and materials for skin protection. The study followed the recommendations STROBE. Simple frequency, measures of central tendency and variability, Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the n = 85 newborns evaluated, n = 62 (72.9%) presented skin or mucosal lesions caused using medical devices, excoriations being the most observed n = 55 (64.7%), and n = 32 (37.6%) had 1-3 lesions. As the number of devices increased, so did the number of lesions. On the other hand, the age of the newborn and the number of lesions were inversely proportional. CONCLUSION: Most participants, n = 62 (72.9%), had skin or mucosal lesions associated with medical devices. The number of medical devices used and the age of the newborn were predictors for this occurrence. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results show that it is fundamental that nurses know the factors that can interfere in the skin and mucosa conditions and, thus, promote the implementation of injury prevention measures in newborns, supporting safe and quality care.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/adverse effects , Equipment and Supplies/adverse effects , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Skin Care/nursing , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...