Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz Dent J ; 26(4): 342-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26312969

ABSTRACT

Endodontic irrigation aims to clean and disinfect the root canal system. Passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) is based on the use of an ultrasound-activated instrument into the root canal filled with irrigant. The aim of this study was to evaluate, ex vivo, the effectiveness of PUI in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis from root canals. Seventy-five extracted human single-root teeth were used. After root canal preparation, specimens were inoculated with E. faecalis and incubated at 37 °C for 21 days. Specimens were distributed into five groups (n=15), according to the irrigation method: PUI + saline solution (PUI/SS); PUI + 1% NaOCl (PUI/NaOCl); conventional needle irrigation (CNI) + saline solution (CNI/SS); CNI + 1% NaOCl (CNI/NaOCl); No irrigation (control). Microbiological samples were collected at three time points: initial (21 days after inoculation), post-irrigation (immediately after irrigation), and final (7 days after irrigation). Data were obtained in CFU mL-1 and subjected to analysis by ANOVA and Tukey's tests at 5% significance level. The post-irrigation samples did not demonstrate statistical difference between PUI/SS and CNI/SS nor between PUI/NaOCl and CNI/NaOCl (p>0.05), but PUI/NaOCl and CNI/NaOCl had lower CFU mL-1 number than the other groups (p>0.05). Statistically significant difference was observed between the initial and post-irrigation samples and between the post-irrigation and final samples (p<0.05) in all groups, except in the control. The final samples of all groups presented bacterial counts similar to the initial samples. PUI or CNI with 1% NaOCl contribute to disinfection, but are unable to eradicate E. faecalis from the root canal system.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity/microbiology , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Therapeutic Irrigation , Ultrasonic Therapy , Ultrasonics , Humans , In Vitro Techniques
2.
J Endod ; 39(3): 346-50, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402505

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. METHODS: Cell culture plates containing growth medium and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used to grow biofilm on bovine dentin, gutta-percha, hydroxyapatite, or bovine bone. Substrates were incubated at 37°C for 14 or 21 days, and the medium was changed every 48 hours. After the growth induction periods, specimens (n = 5 per group and per induction period) were stained by using Live/Dead, and the images were analyzed under a confocal microscope. The total biovolume (µm(3)), live bacteria biovolume (µm(3)), and substrate coverage (%) were quantified by using the BioImage_L software. Results obtained were analyzed by nonparametric tests (P = .05). RESULTS: Biofilm formation was observed in all groups. Gutta-percha had the lowest total biovolume at 14 days (P < .05) and hydroxyapatite the highest at 21 days (P < .05). No significant difference was observed in green biovolume at 14 days. At 21 days, however, hydroxyapatite had the highest volume (P < .05). The percentages of coverage were similar among all substrates at 21 days (P > .05), but at 14 days, bovine bone presented the highest coverage (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis was capable of forming biofilm on all substrates during both growth periods; hydroxyapatite presented the highest rates of biofilm formation. The type of substrate influenced the biofilm characteristics, according to the parameters evaluated.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/growth & development , Enterococcus faecalis/growth & development , Animals , Bone and Bones , Cattle , Dentin , Durapatite , Gutta-Percha , Microscopy, Confocal
3.
Microsc Res Tech ; 75(7): 982-5, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22419602

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the persistence of resin cement residues after dentin surface cleaning with different alcohol-based solutions or an essential oil (eucalyptol). Forty bovine teeth were sectioned in order to expose pulp chamber dentin to be washed with 1.0 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), followed by 0.1 mL of 17% EDTA application for 3 min, and final irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl. The specimens were air dried and resin-based cement was rubbed onto the dentine surface with a microbrush applicator. After 15 min, the surface was scrubbed with a cotton pellet and moistened with different dentin cleaning solutions, compounding the following groups: G1--95% ethanol, G2--70% ethanol, G3--70% isopropyl alcohol, or G4--eucalyptol. The dentin was scrubbed until the cement residues could not be visually detected. Sections were then processed for SEM and evaluated at × 500 magnification. Scores were attributed to each image according to the area covered by residual sealer, and data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis at 5% significance. Eucalyptol promoted the most adequate dentin cleaning, although no statistical difference was detected amongst the groups (P > 0.05), except between the eucalyptol and 70% ethanol groups (P < 0.05). All the evaluated dentin cleaning solutions were unable to completely remove the cement residues from the dentin surface.


Subject(s)
Alcohols/therapeutic use , Cyclohexanols/therapeutic use , Dental Cements/analysis , Dental Cements/therapeutic use , Dentin/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Monoterpenes/therapeutic use , Tooth, Nonvital , Animals , Cattle , Dentin/ultrastructure , Eucalyptol , Incisor , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
4.
Microsc Res Tech ; 75(7): 898-902, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22279037

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the presence of residues after removal of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)(2) ] associated with different vehicles. Thirty single-rooted teeth were instrumented to a master apical file #25 using 2.5% NaOCl as main irrigant and 17% trisodium EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) as final agent irrigant. Then, the root canals were dressed with Ca(OH)(2) associated with silicone oil (Group 1), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (Group 2), or propylene glycol (Group 3). After coronal sealing, all teeth were kept in a moist environment at room temperature. After 7 days, the teeth were reopened and medicaments were removed using 5 mL of saline solution and instrumentation with master apical file followed by new irrigation with 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl. Subsequently, teeth were split longitudinally and assessed by scanning electron microscopy. The wall cleanliness of the cervical and apical thirds of the roots were evaluated and scored by three blinded examiners. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests at 5% level of significance. All roots had residues of Ca(OH)(2) on the canal walls. All experimental groups had similar results (P > 0.05) regardless of the third evaluated. There was significant difference between the apical and cervical thirds only in Group 3 (P < 0.05). Association of different vehicles to Ca(OH)(2) does not influence the persistence of residues on the root canal walls.


Subject(s)
Calcium Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Root Canal Irrigants/therapeutic use , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Tooth, Nonvital , Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure , Humans , Incisor , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21531598

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of irrigating solutions and their combinations against Enterococcus faecalis. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred ten single-rooted human teeth were inoculated with E. faecalis and incubated for 21 days. Teeth were divided according to the irrigant: Group I (GI), 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl); GII, 2.5% NaOCl + 10% citric acid; GIII, 2.5% NaOCl + apple cider vinegar; GIV, apple cider vinegar; GV, 2% chlorhexidine solution; GVI, 1% peracetic acid; GVII, saline solution. Microbiological samples were taken after root canal preparation and 7 days later. Data were submitted to ANOVA (5%). RESULTS: All solutions promoted reduction of E. faecalis after instrumentation, but bacterial counts were higher in the final sample. GI, GV, and GVI had lower bacterial counts than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The irrigating solutions may present activity but do not eradicate E. faecalis in the root canal system.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Dental Pulp Cavity/microbiology , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Root Canal Irrigants/therapeutic use , Analysis of Variance , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/chemistry , Colony Count, Microbial , Dental Pulp Cavity/drug effects , Humans , Root Canal Irrigants/chemistry
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20573528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the apical root surface, gutta-percha interface, and preparation time of root-end resections made with burs, ultrasound, or laser; and 2) the thickness of surrounding dentin after laser or ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation. STUDY DESIGN: 1) Thirty root-filled teeth were resected as follows: Zekrya bur in group I, Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) ultrasonic tip (9.5107-8) in group II, and ErCr:YSGG (Waterlase) in group III. The preparation time was recorded. Replicas of the resected root-ends were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 2) Thirty root-filled teeth were submitted to apicectomies and root-end cavities were prepared by using: CVD (6.1107-6) ultrasonic retrotips (group IV), EMS (DT-060) ultrasonic retrotips (group V), and ErCr:YSGG laser tips (group VI). Replicas of the root apices were examined under a SEM. RESULTS: There were no fissures or fractures on root-end surfaces. The bur produced the smoothest surface (P < .05). Group I had the lowest preparation time (P < .05). The best adaptation between the filling and the root canals walls was observed in group III, but it was not significantly different from group II (P < .05). No resected root-ends had cracks after preparation. Group VI showed the least minimum dentin thickness (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The 3 methods evaluated did not cause any injury to the root-end surface, but they harmed the apical adaptation. Laser tips removed more dentin than ultrasonic retrotips and should be used with care to avoid overpreparation.


Subject(s)
Apicoectomy , Retrograde Obturation , Root Canal Preparation , Analysis of Variance , Apicoectomy/instrumentation , Apicoectomy/methods , Dental Instruments , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dentin/anatomy & histology , Gutta-Percha , Humans , Lasers, Solid-State , Retrograde Obturation/methods , Root Canal Filling Materials , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Statistics, Nonparametric , Ultrasonics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...