Epidemiology of high-energy blunt pelvic ring injuries: A three-year retrospective case series in a level-I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: High-energy pelvic ring injuries (PRI) represent a heavy burden for institutions treating severely injured patients. Epidemiological data knowledge may help to provide them appropriate management. Only two epidemiologic studies about high-energy PRI were published during last decade. This study aimed to determine the gender-specific and global incidences of high-energy blunt AO/OTA type B or C PRI and their frequency among high-energy blunt trauma. It further reports the spectrum of these injuries and compares their characteristics and outcomes to high-energy blunt trauma without type B or C PRI. HYPOTHESIS: Type B or C PRI incidence isn't gender specific and approximates 5/100,000/year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database of a level-I trauma center serving approximately 500,000 inhabitants was retrospectively queried for all high-energy trauma patients injured between 01.01.2014 and 12.31.2016. Inclusion criteria were: alive emergency department delivery; entire acute treatment at the authors' institution; age >16. Exclusion criteria were: penetrating, blast, burn and electrical injuries; drownings; low-energy trauma; patients living outside the institution's catchment area. Three authors performed PRI classifications. Clinical data were extracted from the database. RESULTS: We analyzed 434 patients. High-energy blunt type B or C PRI incidence was 3.8/100,000/year without gender disparity (p=0.6697). High-energy blunt trauma incidence was lower in women than in men (20.5 vs. 51.6/100,000/year, p<0.001). Type B or C PRI frequency during high-energy blunt trauma was higher in women than in men (17.6% vs. 7.9%, p=0.003). Type B or C PRI patients were more severely injured and needed more treatment resources than other high-energy blunt trauma patients but didn't present higher complication or death rates. DISCUSSION: The incidence of high-energy blunt type B or C PRI was comparable to previously published data. Women were less likely to sustain a high-energy blunt trauma, but when they sustained one, they were more likely to have a type B or C PRI. Despite higher injury severity score and resource requirements, complication and death rates weren't different between type B or C PRI patients and other high-energy blunt trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A fracture classification system should be a reliable and reproducible means of communication between different observers. It should be logical, comprehensible, and shouldn't contain an unmanageable number of categories. The aim of this study was to assess the intra- and interobserver agreement and reliability of the revised 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries (PRI), at the level of the types, groups, subgroups and qualifications. HYPOTHESIS: Agreement and reliability of the revised 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy PRI are improved when compared to previous versions of the classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plain radiographs and computed tomography images of a consecutive series of 86 adult patients admitted at a level I trauma center with a high-energy PRI between 01.01.2014 and 31.12.2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Three orthopedic surgeons independently classified these PRI using the 2018 AO/OTA and the Young and Burgess classifications. The senior surgeon analyzed all injuries twice, at 6 months interval, to determine intraobserver reliability. Classification agreement was assessed using percent agreement and classification reliability was assessed using kappa coefficients. RESULTS: For the intraobserver analysis, injury classifications with the 2018 AO/OTA classification were concordant in 88% of cases (type), 74% (group), 66% (subgroup) and 49% (qualification). Respective kappa coefficients were 0.79, 0.68, 0.62 and 0.47. Interobserver agreement declined from 77% (type) to 42% (group), 36% (subgroup) and 24% (qualification). Respective kappa coefficients were 0.72, 0.48, 0.48 and 0.37. Intraobserver (respectively interobserver) percent agreement with the Young and Burgess classification was 76% (50%) and kappa coefficient was 0.69 (0.51). DISCUSSION: The 2018 AO/OTA classification is a reliable tool for daily clinical use and for research purpose at the fracture type level but not at the group, subgroup and qualification levels. These results compare favorably with previously published data for older versions of the classification and may represent an improvement of the AO/OTA classification system in terms of reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective diagnostic study.

Incidence rate and topography of intra-pelvic arterial lesions associated with high-energy blunt pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the rate and topography of intra-pelvic arterial lesions associated with high-energy blunt pelvic ring injuries (PRI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a level I trauma center serving 500,000 inhabitants. A total of 127 consecutive patients with high-energy blunt PRI were included between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017. Every patient had a total body or thoraco-abdominal computed tomography scan including contrast enhanced arterial sequences. A board-certified radiologist reviewed all the vascular images and precisely described every intra-pelvic arterial lesion in terms of localization. Complete pelvic series (standard radiographs and fine cut computed tomography images) were reviewed by three board-certified orthopedic surgeons experienced in PRI management, and Young and Burgess and AO/OTA classifications were determined. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic and outcome data were extracted from the institutional severely injured patients' registry. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 45.3 years and 58.3% were males. Fifteen (11.8%) had a total of 21 intra-pelvic arterial lesions: seven lesions of the obturator artery, four of the superior gluteal artery, three of the inferior gluteal artery, two of the vesical artery, and one of each of the following arteries: internal iliac, internal pudendal, fifth lumbar, lateral sacral, ilio-lumbar. These lesions occurred in 8.6% of lateral compression injuries, 33.3% of anteroposterior compression injuries and 23.5% of vertical shear and combined mechanism injuries (Young and Burgess classification, p = 0.003); and in 0% of type A injuries, 9.9% of type B injuries and 35% of type C injuries (AO/OTA classification, p = 0.001). Patients with an intra-pelvic arterial lesion were more likely to present with pre-hospital hemodynamic instability (p = 0.046) and to need packed red blood cells transfusion within the first 24 h (p = 0.023; they needed a mean of 7.53 units vs. 1.88, p = 0.0016); however, they did not have a worst outcome in terms of complications or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic study found an 11.8% rate of intra-pelvic arterial lesion related to high-energy blunt PRI. The obturator, superior gluteal and inferior gluteal arteries were most often injured. These findings are important for the aggressive management of high-energy blunt PRI.