ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diaphyseal and metaphyseal fractures in children are frequently treated with the flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) method. The aim of this study was to record postoperative complications and outcome in consecutive fracture patients treated with the new precurved tip and shaft nails and dedicated ergonomic instrumentation. METHODS: We report the analysis of 100 consecutive fractures followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Ninety-seven children were included, comprising 77 shaft and 23 metaphyseal fractures. Demographic data, duration of surgery, nail and medullary canal diameter, date of nail removal, clinical assessment, follow-up radiographs and all complications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 9.7 years, and mean body weight 35.1 kg. Twenty-one fractures had associated lesions. Mean duration of surgery was 42.4 minutes. Nail removal was at a mean 6.1 months. Twelve percent of patients had complications, with six insufficient reductions, one delayed union, one non-union, one iterative fracture, and three skin impingements. Unexpected surgical revision was required in seven cases. At follow-up, only one patient showed functional impairment, with 20° pronation loss, and three showed more than 10° axial deviation on X-ray. CONCLUSION: The low rate of skin impingement compared with the literature may be due to the new dedicated instruments. We believe that other complications can be avoided if one follows the FIN principles, avoiding weak assembly due to an insufficient nail/medullary canal diameter ratio, which is a limiting factor for indications in adolescents. The surgeons reported that precurved shaft nails facilitated the FIN procedure, although this subjective judgment may be due simply to the novelty of the nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.
Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Device Removal , Ergonomics , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Humans , Humeral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Male , Postoperative Complications , Radiography , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Ulna Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Ulna Fractures/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Lagrange and Rigault classification was designed to describe extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus. It can also help in treatment decision-making. HYPOTHESIS: The reliability of this classification has not yet been proven. The goal of this study was to assess this system's intra- and interobserver reliability. METHODS: One hundred supracondylar fracture radiographs were randomly retrieved and reviewed by five different observers on two occasions in a different order. The kappa index was used to calculate the intra- and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability was 0.76 and interobserver reliability was 0.69. DISCUSSION: The study shows good intra- and interobserver reliability. The Lagrange and Rigault classification has similar reliability to other supracondylar fracture classifications.
