Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0135402, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26270644

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to discern the contribution of poultry farms to the contamination of the environment with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and therewith, potentially to the spread of these bacteria to humans and other animals. ESBL-producing E. coli were detected at all investigated laying hen farms (n = 5) and broiler farms (n = 3) in 65% (46/71) and 81% (57/70) of poultry faeces samples, respectively. They were detected in rinse water and run-off water (21/26; 81%), other farm animals (11/14; 79%), dust (21/35; 60%), surface water adjacent to farms (20/35; 57%), soil (48/87; 55%), on flies (11/73; 15%), and in barn air (2/33; 6%). The highest prevalence and concentrations in the outdoor environment were observed in soil of free-range areas at laying hen farms (100% of samples positive, geometric mean concentration 2.4×10(4) cfu/kg), and surface waters adjacent to broiler farms during, or shortly after, cleaning between production rounds (91% of samples positive, geometric mean concentration 1.9×10(2) cfu/l). The diversity of ESBL-producing E. coli variants with respect to sequence type, phylogenetic group, ESBL-genotype and antibiotic resistance profile was high, especially on broiler farms where on average 16 different variants were detected, and the average Simpson's Indices of diversity (SID; 1-D) were 0.93 and 0.94 among flock and environmental isolates respectively. At laying hen farms on average nine variants were detected, with SIDs of 0.63 (flock isolates) and 0.77 (environmental isolates). Sixty percent of environmental isolates were identical to flock isolates at the same farm. The highest proportions of 'flock variants' were observed in dust (94%), run-off gullies (82%), and barn air (67%), followed by surface water (57%), soil (56%), flies (50%) and other farm animals (35%).The introduction of ESBL-producing E. coli from poultry farms to the environment may pose a health risk if these bacteria reach places where people may become exposed.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Chickens/microbiology , Escherichia coli Proteins , Escherichia coli , Poultry/microbiology , beta-Lactam Resistance/genetics , beta-Lactamases , Animals , Cephalosporins , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 80(1): 239-46, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24162567

ABSTRACT

In the Netherlands, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli bacteria are highly prevalent in poultry, and chicken meat has been implicated as a source of ESBL-producing E. coli present in the human population. The current study describes the isolation of ESBL-producing E. coli from house flies and blow flies caught at two poultry farms, offering a potential alternative route of transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli from poultry to humans. Overall, 87 flies were analyzed in 19 pools. ESBL-producing E. coli bacteria were detected in two fly pools (10.5%): a pool of three blow flies from a broiler farm and a pool of eight house flies from a laying-hen farm. From each positive fly pool, six isolates were characterized and compared with isolates obtained from manure (n = 53) sampled at both farms and rinse water (n = 10) from the broiler farm. Among six fly isolates from the broiler farm, four different types were detected with respect to phylogenetic group, sequence type (ST), and ESBL genotype: A0/ST3519/SHV-12, A1/ST10/SHV-12, A1/ST58/SHV-12, and B1/ST448/CTX-M-1. These types, as well as six additional types, were also present in manure and/or rinse water at the same farm. At the laying-hen farm, all fly and manure isolates were identical, carrying blaTEM-52 in an A1/ST48 genetic background. The data imply that flies acquire ESBL-producing E. coli at poultry farms, warranting further evaluation of the contribution of flies to dissemination of ESBL-producing E. coli in the community.


Subject(s)
Diptera/microbiology , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Animals , Chickens , Escherichia coli/classification , Escherichia coli/genetics , Genotype , Humans , Manure/microbiology , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Netherlands , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Water Microbiology
3.
J Basic Microbiol ; 53(9): 796-8, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22961372

ABSTRACT

To allow processing of serum samples from animals experimentally infected with Coxiella burnetii outside the BSL-3 facility, an inactivation or clearance protocol that does not hamper serological testing may be required. The effects of filtration (0.1 µm pore size), heating at 56 °C for 30 min, addition of NaN3 (0.09% w/v), and combinations thereof on the presence of viable C. burnetii as well as OD-values in ELISA were tested. Only filtration was shown to effectively clear all culturable C. burnetii.


Subject(s)
Coxiella burnetii/drug effects , Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Disinfection/methods , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Serum/microbiology , Specimen Handling/methods , Animals , Filtration/methods , Hot Temperature , Rats , Sodium Azide/toxicity
4.
BMC Vet Res ; 8: 165, 2012 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22988998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The bacterium Coxiella burnetii has caused unprecedented outbreaks of Q fever in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2010. Since 2007, over 4000 human cases have been reported, with 2354 cases in 2009 alone. Dairy goat farms were identified as most probable sources for emerging clusters of human Q fever cases in their vicinity. However, identifying individual farms as primary source for specific clusters of human cases remains a challenge, partly due to limited knowledge of the different C. burnetii strains circulating in livestock, the environment and humans. RESULTS: We used a multiplex multi-locus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) assay to investigate the genotypic diversity of C. burnetii in different types of samples that were collected nationwide during the Dutch Q fever outbreaks between 2007 and 2010. Typing was performed on C. burnetii positive samples obtained from several independent studies investigating C. burnetii presence in animals and the environment. Six different genotypes were identified on 45 farm locations, based on sequence-confirmed estimates of repeat numbers of six MLVA markers. MLVA genotype A was observed on 38 of the 45 selected farm locations in animals and in environmental samples. CONCLUSIONS: Sequence confirmation of the numbers of tandem repeats within each locus and consensus about repeat identification is essential for accurate MLVA typing of C. burnetii. MLVA genotype A is the most common genotype in animal samples obtained from goat, sheep, and rats, as well as in environmental samples such as (aerosolized) dust, which is considered to be the major transmission route from animals via the environment to humans. The finding of a single dominant MLVA genotype in patients, the environment, and livestock complicates accurate source-finding. Pinpointing individual sources in the Netherlands requires discrimination of genotypes at a higher resolution than attained by using MLVA, as it is likely that the dominant C. burnetii MLVA type will be detected on several farms and in different patients in a particular area of interest.


Subject(s)
Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Q Fever/veterinary , Animals , Coxiella burnetii/genetics , Environmental Microbiology , Genetic Markers , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Goat Diseases/microbiology , Goats , Humans , Multilocus Sequence Typing/methods , Netherlands/epidemiology , Q Fever/epidemiology , Q Fever/microbiology , Rats , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Sheep Diseases/microbiology
5.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 78(16): 5661-5, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22685149

ABSTRACT

Beginning in 2007, the largest human Q fever outbreak ever described occurred in the Netherlands. Dairy goats from intensive farms were identified as the source, amplifying Coxiella burnetii during gestation and shedding large quantities during abortions. It has been postulated that wild rodents are reservoir hosts from which C. burnetii can be transmitted to domestic animals and humans. However, little is known about the infection dynamics of C. burnetii in wild rodents. The aim of this study was to investigate whether brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) can be experimentally infected with C. burnetii and whether transmission to a cage mates occurs. Fourteen male brown rats (wild type) were intratracheally or intranasally inoculated with a Dutch C. burnetii isolate obtained from a goat. At 3 days postinoculation, a contact rat was placed with each inoculated rat. The pairs were monitored using blood samples and rectal and throat swabs for 8 weeks, and after euthanasia the spleens were collected. Rats became infected by both inoculation routes, and detection of C. burnetii DNA in swabs suggests that excretion occurred. However, based on the negative spleens in PCR and the lack of seroconversion, none of the contact animals was considered infected; thus, no transmission was observed. The reproduction ratio R(0) was estimated to be 0 (95% confidence interval = 0 to 0.6), indicating that it is unlikely that rats act as reservoir host of C. burnetii through sustained transmission between male rats. Future research should focus on other transmission routes, such as vertical transmission or bacterial shedding during parturition.


Subject(s)
Coxiella burnetii/pathogenicity , Disease Transmission, Infectious/veterinary , Q Fever/veterinary , Rodent Diseases/pathology , Rodent Diseases/transmission , Animals , Blood/microbiology , Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Male , Pharynx/microbiology , Q Fever/transmission , Rats , Rectum/microbiology , Rodent Diseases/microbiology , Spleen/microbiology
6.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 150(2-3): 122-7, 2011 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21864928

ABSTRACT

The DNA extraction efficiency from milk, whey, soy, corn gluten meal, wheat powders and heat-treated corn grain that were spiked with Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus thuringiensis spores was determined. Two steps were critical: lysis of the spores and binding of the free DNA to the DNA binding magnetic beads in the presence of the interfering powders. For the guanidine-thiocyanate based Nuclisens lysis buffer from Biomerieux we found that between 15 and 30% of the spores survived the lysis step. As most lysis buffers in DNA/RNA extraction kits are guanidine based it is likely that other lysis buffers will show a similar partial lysis of the Bacillus spores. Our results show that soybean flour and wheat flour inhibited the DNA extraction process strongest, leading to unreliable DNA extractions when using too much of the matrix. For corn gluten meal, heat-treated corn grain and milk powders, DNA extraction efficiencies in the presence of 100mg and 10mg of powder resulted in 70%-95% reduced DNA recoveries. The inhibition was, however, reliable and intermediate compared to the inhibition by soy and wheat. Whey powder had the lowest inhibitory effect on DNA-extraction efficiency and recoveries of 70-100% could be reached when using 10mg of powder. The results show that reducing the amount of matrix leads to better DNA-extraction efficiencies, particularly for strongly inhibiting powders such as soy and wheat. Based on these results, a standard protocol to directly isolate DNA from micro-organisms present in complex matrixes such as food and feed powders was designed.


Subject(s)
Bacillus anthracis/genetics , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Food Microbiology , Animals , Bacillus anthracis/growth & development , Bacillus anthracis/isolation & purification , Bacillus thuringiensis/genetics , Bacillus thuringiensis/growth & development , Bacillus thuringiensis/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Flour/microbiology , Milk/microbiology , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Soy Foods/microbiology , Spores, Bacterial/chemistry , Spores, Bacterial/genetics , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Triticum/microbiology , Zea mays/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...