Complications and survival of conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed primary osteosynthesis compared to primary total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment options for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck (FFN) are primary osteosynthesis as a femoral head-spearing technique or primary (hemi)arthroplasty. The most common complications after primary osteosynthesis, such as avascular necrosis (AVN) or non-union, can result in conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty (cTHA). Data concerning complications and survival rates of cTHA in comparison to primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (pTHA) after FFN are limited due to the absence of well-designed studies. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals comparing the rate of postoperative dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, prosthetic joint infections, blood loss during surgery (>1000 mL), postoperative cardiac- and pulmonary complications after pTHA and cTHA in the first year after surgery. As a secondary outcome implant survival of pTHA and cTHA in terms of revision rates was evaluated. RESULTS: In total 548 patients were included (pTHA n = 264 and cTHA n = 284) with a mean follow-up of 5 years (±3.5 SD). No significant differences were found in postoperative complications rates. The revision rate in the pTHA group was 7.2% in comparison to 7.7% in the cTHA group (p = 0.81). No difference in the short-term implant survival was found between both groups (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant differences in terms of postoperative complication rates in the first year after pTHA and cTHA in patients with FFN. Also, no significant difference in short-term implant survival of primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty was found.

Contracture preventive positioning of the hemiplegic arm in subacute stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a contracture preventive positioning procedure for the hemiplegic arm in subacute stroke patients in addition to conventional physio- and occupational therapy. DESIGN: A single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient neurological units from three rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Nineteen subacute stroke patients (minus two drop-outs) with a severe motor deficit of the arm. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects underwent conventional rehabilitation care. Nine subjects additionally received a positioning procedure for two 30-min sessions a day, five days a week, for five weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Passive range of motion of five arm movements using a hydrogoniometer and resistance to passive movement at the elbow using the Ashworth Scale. Secondary outcome measures were pain at the end range of passive motions, the arm section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Barthel Index scores for ADL-independence. Outcome measures were taken after five weeks and additional measurements after 10 weeks by two assessors blinded to group allocation. RESULTS: Comparison of the experimental (n = 9) with the control subjects (n = 8) after five weeks showed that additional positioning significantly slowed down development of shoulder abduction contracture (P = 0.042, -5.3 degrees versus -23 degrees). No other differences were found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a contracture preventive positioning procedure for the hemiplegic arm slowed down the development of shoulder abduction contracture. Positioning did not show significant additional value on other outcome measures. Since the sample size was small, results of this study need future verification.