Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30549480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Dutch patients with bipolar disorder (BD), identify factors associated with MetS, and estimate the rate of pharmacologic treatment of MetS in this population. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of medical records of adult patients (≥ 18 years) with BD receiving psychotropic drug treatment was performed in a Dutch psychiatric outpatient setting. MetS was determined according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III-Adapted (NCEP ATP III-A) criteria. Data collection via review of medical records from 2015 was conducted in 2016. RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS in the sample (N = 71) was 42.3%. Multivariate analysis showed sex and body mass index were independently associated with MetS. Males had an almost 8-fold higher risk of MetS than females (OR = 7.7, 95% CI, 1.5-39.6), and with every point of increase on BMI, the risk of MetS increased by 40% (OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Of the patients with hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, 81%, 72.4%, and 65.0%, respectively, did not receive drug treatment for these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The study found a high prevalence rate of MetS and substantial undertreatment of the components of MetS in patients with BD in a Dutch outpatient clinic. Follow-up investigation in larger samples is warranted.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence
2.
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) ; 16(1): 32-39, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29599651

ABSTRACT

Mindfulness meditation has a longstanding history in eastern practices that has received considerable public interest in recent decades. Indeed, the science, practice, and implementation of Mindfulness Based Interventions (MBIs) have dramatically increased in recent years. At its base, mindfulness is a natural human state in which an individual experiences and attends to the present moment. Interventions have been developed to train individuals how to incorporate this practice into daily life. The current article will discuss the concept of mindfulness and describe its implementation in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We further identify for whom MBIs have been shown to be efficacious and provide an up-to-date summary of how these interventions work. This includes research support for the cognitive, psychological, and neural mechanisms that lead to psychiatric improvements. This review provides a basis for incorporating these interventions into treatment.

3.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 79(1)2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28252881

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is a disabling illness, often comorbid with depression. We performed a randomized controlled pilot study on mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) targeting depression in a chronic pain population. METHOD: Participants with chronic pain lasting ≥ 3 months; DSM-IV major depressive disorder (MDD), dysthymic disorder, or depressive disorder not otherwise specified; and a 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (QIDS-C16) score ≥ 6 were randomly assigned to MBCT (n = 26) or waitlist (n = 14). We adapted the original MBCT intervention for depression relapse prevention by modifying the psychoeducation and cognitive-behavioral therapy elements to an actively depressed chronic pain population. We analyzed an intent-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol sample; the per-protocol sample included participants in the MBCT group who completed at least 4 of 8 sessions. Changes in scores on the QIDS-C16 and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Sale (HDRS17) were the primary outcome measures. Pain, quality of life, and anxiety were secondary outcome measures. Data collection took place between January 2012 and July 2013. RESULTS: Nineteen participants (73%) completed the MBCT program. No significant adverse events were reported in either treatment group. ITT analysis (n = 40) revealed no significant differences. Repeated-measures analyses of variance for the per-protocol sample (n = 33) revealed a significant treatment × time interaction (F1,31 = 4.67, P = .039, η²p = 0.13) for QIDS-C16 score, driven by a significant decrease in the MBCT group (t18 = 5.15, P < .001, d = >1.6), but not in the control group (t13 = 2.01, P = .066). The HDRS17 scores did not differ significantly between groups. The study ended before the projected sample size was obtained, which might have prevented effect detection in some outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: MBCT shows potential as a treatment for depression in individuals with chronic pain, but larger controlled trials are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01473615.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Mindfulness , Chronic Pain/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome
4.
Front Psychol ; 7: 967, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27445929

ABSTRACT

Body awareness has been proposed as one of the major mechanisms of mindfulness interventions, and it has been shown that chronic pain and depression are associated with decreased levels of body awareness. We investigated the effect of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on body awareness in patients with chronic pain and comorbid active depression compared to treatment as usual (TAU; N = 31). Body awareness was measured by a subset of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) scales deemed most relevant for the population. These included: Noticing, Not-Distracting, Attention Regulation, Emotional Awareness, and Self-Regulation. In addition, pain catastrophizing was measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). These scales had adequate to high internal consistency in the current sample. Depression severity was measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician rated (QIDS-C16). Increases in the MBCT group were significantly greater than in the TAU group on the "Self-Regulation" and "Not Distracting" scales. Furthermore, the positive effect of MBCT on depression severity was mediated by "Not Distracting." These findings provide preliminary evidence that a mindfulness-based intervention may increase facets of body awareness as assessed with the MAIA in a population of pain patients with depression. Furthermore, they are consistent with a long hypothesized mechanism for mindfulness and emphasize the clinical relevance of body awareness.

5.
J Psychiatr Res ; 70: 98-105, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424428

ABSTRACT

We examined efficacy and safety of one specific cranial electrical stimulator (CES) device at a fixed setting in subjects with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). Thirty subjects (57% female, mean age 48.1 ± 12.3 years) with MDD and inadequate response to standard antidepressants were randomized to 3 weeks of treatment with CES (15/500/15,000 Hz, symmetrical rectangular biphasic current of 1-4 mAmp, 40 V) or sham CES (device off) for 20 min, 5 days per week. The primary outcome measure was improvement in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17). Adverse effects (AEs) were assessed using the Patient Related Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE). Completion rates were 88% for CES, 100% for sham. Both treatment groups demonstrated improvement of about 3-5 points in HAM-D-17 scores (p < 0.05 for both), and no significant differences were observed between groups. Remission rates were 12% for CES, and 15% for sham, a nonsignificant difference. CES was deemed safe, with good tolerability; poor concentration and malaise were the only distressing AEs that differed significantly between CES and sham (p = 0.019 and p = 0.043, respectively). Limitations include a small sample and lack of an active comparator therapy. Although both treatment groups improved significantly, this CES at the setting chosen did not separate from sham in this sample. Thus we cannot rule out that the benefit from this setting used in this particular form of CES was due to placebo effects. Since this form of CES has other settings, future studies should test these settings and compare it against other CES devices. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT01325532.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Double-Blind Method , Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...