Systematic review of breast cancer related lymphoedema: making a balanced decision to perform an axillary clearance.

AIM: Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is a disabling complication developing after breast cancer treatment in a proportion of patients. Its impact on quality of life becomes more substantial as survival after breast cancer diagnosis increases. The incidence of BCRL following breast cancer treatment varies due to a lack of -uniform definition and measurement criteria. This review aims to determine the prevalence of BCRL following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as a benchmark to be used in a risk-benefit medical decision whether to proceed with ALND or not. The risk of leaving unresected non-sentinel metastatic lymph nodes with a presumed inherent risk of local recurrence will be balanced against the risk of BCRL following a potentially unnecessary ALND. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for all publications on BCRL in order to estimate its -incidence and to decide on the most appropriate measurement method to use in clinical practice. RESULTS: 51 articles were identified on BCRL incidence and measurement technique. Most studies measured BCRL based on differences in arm circumference (n = 18) or by self-reported symptoms (n = 18). The weighted average of BCRL incidence following ALND measured by self-report and circumference method was 28% and 16%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The importance of ALND and irradiation as part of the treatment of operable breast carcinoma is well established, but its morbidity is less well documented. We argue self-report as the most appropriate method to -establish a diagnosis of BCRL. Therefore a 28% risk of finding non-sentinel lymph node metastases in a completion ALND will be regarded as the cut-off in a medical decision to proceed with ALND.

Identification of neonatal near miss by systematic screening for metabolic acidosis at birth.

AIMS: To evaluate the relevance of systematic screening for neonatal metabolic acidosis at birth as part of perinatal audit. METHODS: For every baby, born in Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk Belgium between 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2010, cord blood was analysed to diagnose metabolic acidosis, defined as arterial or venous pH ≤ 7.05 or 7.17 respectively, in association with base excess of ≤ -10 mmol/L. Three observers identified indicators for suboptimal peripartal care with likely contribution to metabolic acidosis. In a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, these indicators were classified into 5 categories : (a) fetal monitoring error (b) labour management error, (c) instrumental vaginal delivery for fetal distress within 2 h of second stage, (d) non-obstetric medical complications, (e) preterm births or accidental cases at term. RESULTS: In a total of 2117 neonates, there were 11 intra-uterine, 1 intrapartum and 3 early neonatal deaths, bringing early perinatal mortality rate at 7.1‰. Metabolic acidosis was identified in 23 (1.1%) babies, of which 21 (91.3%) left hospital in good clinical condition. Two babies (0.9‰), born in category c, had chronic neurologic symptoms. DISCUSSION: Systematic screening for neonatal metabolic acidosis caused a 2.5-fold increase of case identifications eligible for perinatal audit and opened perspectives towards rationalised improvement of perinatal care, in addition to the information obtained from cases of perinatal mortality. Next to indicators of perinatal mortality, perinatal audit programs should include neonatal metabolic acidosis as an extra parameter for quality assessment of perinatal care. CONCLUSION: Adding cases of near-miss neonatal morbidity to perinatal mortalities in perinatal audit programs increases opportunities for improvement of perinatal care.

Outcome of per protocol best-evidence based routine breast cancer care in a large regional hospital in Belgium: the importance of a prospective database in quality assurance.

AIM: Criteria for future accreditation of breast cancer centres in Belgium will be mainly based on the case load per surgeon or per centre. We would like to argue that the prospective collection of relevant data and the analysis of treatment related outcome derived from these data is feasible and should be the ultimate criterion for quality assessment and thus for accreditation since outcome is a more direct measurement of quality. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on 715 invasive non metastatic breast cancers between 2002 and 2007 treated according to standard, best-evidence protocols in the setting of a large district hospital. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis were performed and compared to national and international databases. RESULTS: 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in our series were respectively 77 and 84%. In the multivariate analysis of DFS, only her-2-neu status (her-2-neu positivity being associated with a poor prognosis) and age (older age being a worse prognostic factor) were statistically significant prognostic factors. For OS, her-2-neu, age, and positive nodes were statistically significant prognostic factors. The outcome is comparable to other data sets. CONCLUSION: Centres dedicated to the care of women with breast cancer have the moral duty to produce outcome based results of their treatment. This report shows that such a collection of data is feasible and can be imposed as a prerequisite for accreditation. We also argue that outcome based data of treatment are a more solid base for quality assurance than case load.

The construct of breast cancer risk perception: need for a better risk communication?

Breast cancer risk assessment and communication are much neglected aspects of women's health care. Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer-related disease that touches the deepest of a women's feelings and the subject thus attracts much of the attention of the media. Disease prevalence and media coverage are the roots of inappropriate breast cancer risk perception. Many women overestimate their personal breast cancer risk. Inappropriate risk perception precedes inappropriate health behaviour and it is pivotal to understand the underlying mechanisms in order to plan intervention. Whether interventions such as patient education through counselling and objective risk assessment are effective in restoring inappropriate breast cancer risk perception remains a question unanswered, but the tools to measure breast cancer risk are available and were validated.

Audit on nuchal translucency thickness measurements in Flanders, Belgium: a plea for methodological standardization.

OBJECTIVES: To audit nuchal translucency thickness (NT) measurements for fetal aneuploidy screening in Flanders, and to estimate the impact of small variations in NT measurement on the screening result of two first-trimester screening algorithms: maternal age + NT (Algorithm A), and maternal age + NT + pregnancy associated plasma protein-A + free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Algorithm B). METHODS: We used the database of first-trimester combined screening, as collected by the General Medical Laboratory AML in Antwerp, Belgium, between 1 January 2001 and 1 April 2004. Audit was performed by establishing a delta-NT distribution curve for one trainee of The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) and for a group of 263 other sonographers, in comparison with the FMF reference values. Risks for fetal aneuploidy were calculated at a cut-off value of 1 : 300 for Algorithm A and 1 : 150 for Algorithm B. These risks were recalculated in both algorithms after a modeled increase of all NT values by 0.1 or 0.2 mm. RESULTS: In a total of 592 measurements performed by the FMF trainee, the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles of delta-NT measurements were at -0.41, +0.03 and +0.68 mm, respectively. These values were close to the FMF reference values. The screen-positive rate for this set of data was 4.4% (26/592) in both algorithms. For the 12 555 measurements of the 263 other sonographers, the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles of delta-NT were at -0.81, -0.14 and +0.73 mm, respectively, which clearly indicates underestimation of NT in the lower range. In this set of data the screen-positive rate was 3.5% for both algorithms (439/12 555 for Algorithm A and 436/12 555 for Algorithm B). Also in this group, 5% (59/1186) of negative screening results at maternal age > or = 35 years in Algorithm A became positive after a modeled 0.1-mm increase in NT, whereas this was only in 1.2% (134/11 369) of tests at maternal age < 35 years (P < 0.0001). The overall increase of screen-positive rate in Algorithm A after an NT modification of +0.1 mm was 1.2% (152/12 555), significantly more than in Algorithm B (86/12 555; 0.7%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In Flanders, there is a systematic underestimation of NT in comparison with the FMF reference range. Attempts to change these measurements according to the FMF criteria are crucial. This will mainly influence the screening results of women at advanced maternal age and of NT-based algorithms without the use of other parameters.

Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma: can we do without any longer?

The aim of the study was to identify variables that may predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with cervical cancer as maturing data from the literature indicate that this therapeutic strategy might be beneficial to some but harmful to others. Clinico-pathologic variables including age, histology, tumor differentiation, as well as immunohistochemical overexpression of p53, mdm2, c-erbB-2, and cathepsin D in 37 of these patients were evaluated as possible predictors of response to the NACT. Fifty-five patients with stage IIB cervical cancer submitted to two courses of cisplatin/ifosfamide/mesna prior to definitive treatment with radical surgery or radiation therapy were the subjects of this study. The clinical response rate was 80% but none of the variables was able to predict response to NACT. Unless methods are found enabling us to predict response and therefore to identify those patients that could benefit from including NACT in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, only women with primarily resectable tumors should be selected for this multimodality approach as a result of the possibility of cross-resistance with radiation therapy in nonresponders.

The prognostic significance of p53, mdm2, c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, and thrombocytosis in stage IB cervical cancer treated by primary radical hysterectomy.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of platelet count, p53, MDM2, c-erbB-2, and cathepsin D immunoreactivity as predictors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) as well as their prognostic significance in patients with stage IB cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy between 1991 through 1995. We also report on the outcome of a protocol considering lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) in addition to LNM as a strong motivation for adjuvant radiotherapy. A total of 93 patients were the subject of this retrospective study. The incidence of positive nodes was high (30.1%). Thrombocytosis (>/= 400.000/mm3) was present in 6.7% of patients. Positive immunostaining was found for p53 (50.6%), MDM2 (21.7%), c-erbB-2 (14.5%), and cathepsin D (45.8%), but none of them was able to predict LNM. Only thrombocytosis was associated with an unfavorable prognosis: a statistically significant association was shown with relapse-free and overall survival in an univariate analysis (P = 0.0431 and P = 0.0012, respectively) with a tendency to significance in multivariate analysis (P = 0.079 and P = 0.0882, respectively). We postulate that thrombocytosis in early stage cervical cancer could be a marker for subclinical tumor burden. LVSI, regarded as an indication for adjuvant radiotherapy, was no longer associated with poor relapse-free or overall survival, but resulted in a 41% postoperative irradiation rate. Further research is needed to establish the value of LVSI in postoperative radiotherapy decision making.