Barriers and facilitators for healthy lifestyle and recommendations for counseling in endometrial cancer follow-up care: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Lifestyle promotion during follow-up consultations may improve long-term health and quality of life in endometrial cancer patients. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to improve and sustain a healthy lifestyle that can be translated to behavioral methods and strategies for lifestyle counseling. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients from three hospitals were recruited to participate in a semi-structured interview. The data were transcribed and coded. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes and the behavior change wheel was used as a theoretical framework. Data saturation was confirmed after 18 interviews. RESULTS: Barriers included knowledge gaps as well as lack of motivation and environmental opportunities to engage in health-promoting behavior. Facilitators included applying incremental lifestyle changes, social support, positive reinforcements, and the ability to overcome setbacks. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the following intervention functions: education, persuasion, training, environmental restructuring, and enablement. Suitable behavior change techniques to deliver the intervention functions include information about the consequences of certain behavior, feedback on behavior, credible source, graded tasks, habit formation, restructuring of the environment, prompts/cues, goal setting, action planning, and social support. Including these recommendations in lifestyle counseling could aid lasting lifestyle change since it suits the needs and preferences of patients.

[Treatment for an adjustment disorder after cancer: results of a Dutch study]. / Behandeling van een aanpassingsstoornis na kanker.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of treatment for an adjustment disorder in accordance with the Dutch guideline for an adjustment disorder in cancer survivor (i.e. people living with or after cancer) on distress, psychological symptoms and quality of life. DESIGN: Prospective cohort in which cancer survivors completed questionnaires prior to and after they received treatment for an adjustment disorder in accordance with the Dutch guideline 'adjustment disorder in patients with cancer'. METHOD: Using paired t-tests, the primary outcomes 'experienced distress' (Distress Thermometer) and 'psychological distress' (HADS) and secondary outcomes functioning, fatigue, and insomnia (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were compared before and after treatment. Clinically relevant improvement was also calculated for each outcome measure. The average costs per treatment were calculated based on the average number of sessions and the indexed NZA rate for the GGZ. RESULTS: A total of 563 cancer survivors received treatment and completed pre- and post-treatment questionnaires. They attended, on average, 11 treatment sessions. The average cost per treatment was €1.141. The results show a statistically significant decrease (p < .001) and a clinically relevant reduction in experienced distress, psychological distress, fatigue, insomnia and a clinically relevant improvement in functioning in cancer survivors following treatment for an adjustment disorder. CONCLUSION: Treatment for adjustment disorder for cancer survivors seems to lead to, at manageable cost, improved quality of life. Inclusion of the guideline in the quality register of the Dutch National Health Care Institute and treatment in accordance with this guideline is recommended.