ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the microshear bond strength (µ-SBS) between resin-based cements and core build-up materials after water storage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cylinders (1x1 mm) of conventional dual-cure resin cement (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE), universal dual-cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) or self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE) were adhered to disks (6x2 mm) made with commercial core build-up materials (Bis-Core, Bisco or LuxaCore Z, DMG) or conventional nanocomposite resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE). The specimens (n=10) were submitted to µ-SBS test using a universal testing machine and fracture pattern analysis at 48 hours or after 9 months of water storage. The data were evaluated by three-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: After 48 hours, regardless of the resin-based cement used, the µ-SBS to the conventional resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) was greater compared to other materials. However, after 9 months, there was a statistically significant decrease in µ-SBS values between the conventional resin composite and evaluated luting agents. The µ-SBS values of core build-up commercial materials (Bis-Core and LuxaCore Z) did not change over time. Regardless of the composite used and storage time, there was no statistically significant difference between the resin-based cements. After 48 h, the most prevalent failure was mixed for all groups. However, after 9 months, the core build-up materials showed a predominantly mixed fracture pattern whereas the resin composite presented an adhesive pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial core build-up materials achieved stable bonding performance with resin-based cements over time. Key words:Composite resins, resin cement, dental restoration failure.
