ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Introducing point-of-care (POC) INR measurement to monitor anticoagulant therapy may be beneficial for both patients and anticoagulation clinics. However, agreement between POC and laboratory INR results is still unclear, especially at sub- and supratherapeutic levels. Therefore we investigated the analytical and clinical agreement between POC INR results of the Coaguchek XS and laboratory INR results of the STA-R Evolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired POC and laboratory INR results were obtained and analyzed in 3257 patients aged 18-104 years between August 2008 and March 2014. RESULTS: Mean difference between POC and laboratory results ranged from -0.18 (95%CI -0.20;-0.16) INR point for POC results 2.0-3.0, up to 1.14 (95%CI 0.87;1.42) INR point for POC results 7.1-8.0. In the therapeutic range (POC INR 2.0-4.0), mean difference between POC and laboratory results was -0.13 (95%CI -0.15;-0.12) INR point. At subtherapeutic (POC INR <2.0) and supratherapeutic (POC INR >4.0) INR levels, mean differences were -0.13 (95%CI -0.15;-0.11) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.63;0.80) INR point, respectively. Clinical agreement regarding therapeutic range was present in 92.0% (POC within range), 67.7% (POC below range) and 87.6% (POC above range) of the paired measurements. We observed ≥15% INR difference between the POC and laboratory result in 14.8% (POC INR 2.0-4.0), 17.0% (POC INR<2.0) and 47.8% (POC INR >4.0) of the paired measurements. CONCLUSIONS: POC and laboratory INR results were strongly correlated within the therapeutic range and differences between results become larger with increasing INR. Clinical disagreement between laboratory and POC results occurs often at both sub- and supratherapeutic INR levels.
Subject(s)
Drug Monitoring/methods , International Normalized Ratio/methods , Point-of-Care Testing , Reagent Strips , Thromboembolism/blood , Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Mycophenolic acid (MPA) and methotrexate (MTX) are immunosuppressive drugs used for the treatment of various immunological disorders. MPA is an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase and MTX is a folate antagonist that inhibits tetrahydrofolate reductase. Production of T cell cytokines in whole blood cultures, as well as in PBMC cultures, is inhibited by a low concentration of both drugs. Inhibition of cytokine production after monocyte stimulation was less evident. The mechanism by which inhibition is achieved is different for both drugs. Inhibition of T cell cytokine production by MPA was more profound and started earlier compared to the inhibition by MTX. MTX induced apoptosis in T cells that became activated, whereas MPA prevented activation of T cells by arresting the cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase. Addition of guanosine and adenosine can overcome this cell cycle arrest, even after several days. Furthermore MPA inhibited the expression of activation markers HLA-DR and CD71 on T cells. The observation that MTX cannot prevent T cell activation but induces apoptosis in activated T cells, and that MPA reversibly prevents activation of T cells could explain the immunosuppressive effects of both these drugs.
