Attempted and completed suicide: not what we expected?

BACKGROUND: Suicide attempters and suicide completers are two overlapping but distinct suicide populations. This study aims to present a more accurate characterization by comparing populations of suicide attempters and completers from the same geographical area. METHODS: Samples and procedure: All cases of attempted suicide treated at the emergency room of the Corporacio Sanitària i Universitària Tauli Parc de Sabadell in 2008 (n=312) were compared with all completed suicides recorded in the same geographical area from 2008 to 2011 (n=86). Hospital and primary care records were reviewed for sociodemographic and clinical variables. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square, ANOVA, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to identify characteristics related to suicide completion. RESULTS: Compared to suicide attempters, suicide completers were more likely to be male (73.3% vs. 37.8%; p<0.001), pensioners (73.7% vs. 23.4%; p<0.001), and people living alone (31.8% vs. 11.4%; p=0.006). Suicide completers more frequently presented somatic problems (71.7 vs. 15.7; p<0.001), Major Depressive Disorder (54.7% vs. 27.9%; p<0.001), and made use of more lethal methods (74.1 vs. 1.9; p<0.001). Suicide completers were more likely to have been followed by a primary care provider (50.0% vs. 16.0%; p<0.001). 92.3% of the suicides committed were completed during the first or second attempt. LIMITATIONS: Suicide completers were not evaluated using the psychological autopsy method. CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting a profile of greater social and clinical severity, suicide completers are less likely to be followed by Mental Health Services than suicide attempters. Current prevention programs should be tailored to the specific profile of suicide completers.

Suicidal phenotypes associated with family history of suicidal behavior and early traumatic experiences.

BACKGROUND: Family history of suicidal behavior and personal history of childhood trauma are risk factors for suicidal behaviors. We hypothesize that subjects with any of these risk factors will show differential features and that subjects with both of them will display more severe phenotypes. METHODS: This study compares three groups of suicide attempters (n=878): subjects with a family history of suicidal behavior and a personal history of early traumatic experiences, subjects with a family history of suicidal behavior or a personal history of early traumatic experiences, and subjects with neither of these two risk factors, with regards to psychopathology, personality traits and suicidal behavior. RESULTS: Subjects with a family history of suicidal behavior and childhood trauma were younger at their first suicide attempt and made more frequent, severe and violent attempts when compared with the other groups. Differences in number and precocity of attempts remained after adjustments in a multinomial regression model. Finally, personality profiles were also substantially different in the group with higher impulsiveness, novelty seeking, affective lability and hopelessness. LIMITATIONS: The information provided by subjects regarding childhood abuse and family history of suicidal behavior was not confirmed by other sources. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide attempters with a family history of suicidal behavior and childhood trauma show specific characteristics that might be used to prevent future suicidal behaviors in this population. Both risk factors should be routinely investigated when assessing the suicidal risk of a patient.

Cost-efficiency of laboratory testing among psychiatric inpatients.

BACKGROUND: A set of tests to rule out medical conditions among psychiatric inpatients is still to be defined. A first step in this direction is to determine the utility of lab tests commonly used by psychiatrists. METHODS: Biochemical tests have been routinely performed on inpatients in a psychiatric hospitalization unit from 2006 to 2009. This study examines the prevalence of abnormal values in 1,278 laboratory tests performed on 894 patients. The number of subjects screened and the direct expenditure needed to find results outside the normal range were computed. Differences in clinical profiles were compared between diagnostic groups according to main diagnosis. RESULTS: We found high rates of seropositive patients for human immunodeficiency virus (14.3%) and hepatitis B virus (15.7%). Most patients met at least one criteria of metabolic syndrome (67.6%). The detection of hepatic abnormalities was very efficient (65.71%), particularly for patients diagnosed with alcohol use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-efficiency of lab tests in psychiatric units is greatly variable. Though results of this study may not be generalized due to the different prevalence of medical conditions, the methodology can be easily implemented across psychiatric services. Cost-effectiveness and costbenefit analyses are warranted.