ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that treatment time, debris/biofilm, and oral pH have an influence on the physical-chemical properties of orthodontic brackets and arch wires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty metal brackets were evaluated. They were divided into four groups (n â=â 30) according to treatment time: group C (control) and groups T12, T24, and T36 (brackets recovered after 12, 24, and 36 months of treatment, respectively). Rectangular stainless-steel arch wires that remained in the oral cavity for 12 to 24 months were also analyzed. Dimensional stability, surface morphology, composition of brackets, resistance to sliding of the bracket-wire set, surface roughness of wires, and oral pH were analyzed. One-way analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey multiple comparisons test, was used for statistical analysis (P < .05). RESULTS: Carbon and oxygen were shown to be elements that increased expressively and in direct proportion to time, and there was a progressive increase in the coefficient of friction and roughness of wires as a function of time of clinical use after 36 months. Oral pH showed a significant difference between group T36 and its control (P â=â .014). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis was partially accepted: treatment time and biofilm and debris accumulation in bracket slots were shown to have more influence on the degradation process and frictional force of these devices than did oral pH.
Subject(s)
Dental Alloys/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Orthodontic Wires , Adolescent , Adult , Biofilms , Carbon/analysis , Chemical Phenomena , Dental Deposits/chemistry , Electron Probe Microanalysis , Friction , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Orthodontic Brackets/microbiology , Orthodontic Wires/microbiology , Oxygen/analysis , Saliva/physiology , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Surface Properties , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the protective effect of remineralizing agents on enamel caries lesions using surface Knoop microhardness testing (KHN) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). METHODS: Forty-eight human enamel blocks were assigned to four groups (N=12): (1) control (without agent); (2) fluoride varnish (Duraphat); (3) nano-HAP paste (Desensibilize Nano P); and (4) casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste (MI Paste Plus). Incipient caries-like lesions were artificially developed. Cariogenic challenge (pH-cycling) was performed for seven days. The pastes were applied before each immersion in demineralization solution, and the varnish was applied only once. KHN values were obtained at baseline, after incipient enamel lesion, and after challenge. The percentage of surface hardness recovery (%SMHR) was performed, and the surface morphology was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). ANOVA, Tukey's, and student paired t tests were applied at P<.05. RESULTS: After the cariogenic challenge, the nano-HAP group showed significantly higher KHN and %SMHR values than varnish. The CPP-ACP group showed no increase in KHN. The nano-HAP group showed, via AFM, a protective layer formation with globular deposits on the surface. CONCLUSION: SMHR and AFM morphology revealed that nano-hydroxyapatite paste showed a protective effect against in vitro enamel caries development.
Subject(s)
Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Durapatite/therapeutic use , Nanostructures/therapeutic use , Tooth Demineralization/prevention & control , Cariostatic Agents/chemistry , Caseins/therapeutic use , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Durapatite/chemistry , Fluorides, Topical/therapeutic use , Hardness , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Nanostructures/chemistry , Ointments , Protective Agents/therapeutic use , Sodium Fluoride/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Tooth Remineralization/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Calcium nanophosphate paste can provide ions to remineralize enamel. There are, however, no data available about the remineralizing effect of this paste on the prevention of enamel erosion, when compared with highly concentrated fluoride agents. AIM: To analyze the effect of calcium nanophosphate paste, fluoride gel, and varnish to protect against enamel erosion using surface Knoop hardness (KNH) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). DESIGN: Forty enamel blocks (4 × 4 mm) of third molars were used for 4 groups (n = 10): 1.23% fluoride gel (Fluorgel-DFL(®) ); calcium nanophosphate paste (Desensibilize NanoP-FGM(®) ); fluoride varnish (Duraphat-Colgate(®) ) and control (without agent). The specimens were immersed in cola drink for 5 min and 2 h in artificial saliva, 4× per day for 5 days. The agents were applied before the first erosive cycle. KNH values were obtained before and after the erosive challenge. The surface morphology was evaluated by AFM. anova, Tukey's, and T-Student tests were applied. RESULTS: After erosion, no significant difference was found for KNH among gel, nanophosphate, and varnish groups; however, they showed higher KNH than control group. Gel and nanophosphate paste showed a protective layer formation on enamel surface by AFM. CONCLUSIONS: The calcium nanophosphate paste showed similar protection against enamel erosion compared with high-concentrated fluoride agents, even containing lower fluoride concentration.
Subject(s)
Calcium Phosphates/chemistry , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Fluorides/chemistry , Nanoparticles , Tooth Erosion , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Microscopy, Atomic ForceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the protective effect of remineralizing agents on enamel caries lesions using surface Knoop microhardness testing (KHN) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). METHODS: Forty-eight human enamel blocks were assigned to four groups (N=12): (1) control (without agent); (2) fluoride varnish (Duraphat); (3) nano-HAP paste (Desensibilize Nano P); and (4) casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste (MI Paste Plus). Incipient caries-like lesions were artificially developed. Cariogenic challenge (pH-cycling) was performed for seven days. The pastes were applied before each immersion in demineralization solution, and the varnish was applied only once. KHN values were obtained at baseline, after incipient enamel lesion, and after challenge. The percentage of surface hardness recovery (%SMHR) was performed, and the surface morphology was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). ANOVA, Tukey's, and student paired t tests were applied at P<.05. RESULTS: After the cariogenic challenge, the nano-HAP group showed significantly higher KHN and %SMHR values than varnish. The CPP-ACP group showed no increase in KHN. The nano-HAP group showed, via AFM, a protective layer formation with globular deposits on the surface. CONCLUSION: SMHR and AFM morphology revealed that nano-hydroxyapatite paste showed a protective effect against in vitro enamel caries development.