Improved brachial skin hydration and appearance with hyperdiluted calcium hydroxylapatite.

INTRODUCTION: The search for minimally invasive treatments for areas not covered by clothing, such as the arms, has increased, particularly to combat flaccidity resulting from factors such as aging and weight loss. This study evaluated the efficacy of calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), an injectable biostimulator, in improving flaccidity and hydration of the skin of the arms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six women between 40 and 50 years old with visible signs of brachial flaccidity were selected. Calcium hydroxyapatite was injected into the arms in a 1:4 dilution (1.5 mL per side), with subjective evaluation based on the GAIS score and objective hydration analysis using corneometry. RESULTS: After a single application of CaHA, there was a significant increase in skin hydration (12.2%), objectively assessed by corneometry. Patient and physician satisfaction was high, evidenced by visible improvements in photographs and by the GAIS score. No significant adverse events were reported, demonstrating the safety of the procedure. DISCUSSION: Our clinical observations confirm the ability of CaHA to visibly improve arm flaccidity. In addition, hydration measures support previous histological studies demonstrating increases in dermal proteoglycans. Compared to other studies, the increase in skin hydration with CaHA was similar to those obtained with hyaluronic acid, suggesting comparable results with a more comfortable and less invasive technique. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the efficacy of CaHA in improving hydration of brachial skin after a single treatment. Despite the limitations of the sample size, the research contributes to the medical literature, highlighting the utility of the 3 mL CaHA presentation for brachial treatment with objective results in skin hydration.

Treatment of Atrophy of the Labia Majora: Calcium Hydroxyapatite or Hyaluronic Acid?

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of treating atrophied labia majora with hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA). METHODS: Ten participants complaining of sagging or loss of volume in the labia majora were evaluated and randomly assigned to two groups-treated with CaHA or AH. Photographic documentation was taken and appreciated by the participants and by blind observers. RESULTS: The study showed an improvement in labia majora regarding volumization and flaccidity that was more significant after 90 days of treatment in both treatments. Besides flaccidity, volume replacement resulted in better balance and proportion between the labia majora and labia minora. The evaluators, independent and blind, judged that in 80% of the cases of the HA group and in 50% of cases of the CaHA group, there was an excellent improvement. CONCLUSION: CaHA and HA are both effective and safe for treating the intimate region, and this study cannot prove the superiority of one over the other. An appropriate assessment involving the analysis of sagging and/or volume loss and the creation of a sequential treatment protocol, involving CaHA and HA, seems to be the best solution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .