Prospective randomized controlled trial: early weight bearing after conservative treatment of Weber B ankle fractures (pancake trial).

PURPOSE: Different studies have shown that weightbearing is safe in stable transsyndesmotic, isolated lateral simple ankle fractures. Despite this evidence, AO guidelines still recommend immobilization with above-the-knee cast for 4-6 weeks for these fractures. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of mobilization and weightbearing to those of immobilization and non-weightbearing in patients with stable transsyndesmotic, lateral isolated simple ankle fractures. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomly assigned to permissive weightbearing in a walking boot or non-weightbearing immobilization using a below-the-knee cast. Primary outcome was ankle functionality as scored by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were radiological displacement of fracture, range of motion (ROM), calf circumference, and RAND 36-item health survey. Patients were in follow-up for 24 months. RESULTS: Ankle functionality after six and twelve weeks was significantly higher for the intervention group, with respectively 30 points (p = 0.001) and 10 points (p = 0.015) of difference. ROM improved significantly in the intervention group after six weeks. All fractures showed radiological progression of fracture healing. RAND 36-item showed differences in both physical (60.3 vs. 46.3, p = 0.017) and mental (78.5 vs. 58.2, p = 0.034) components in favor of the intervention group. In 16% of patients who initially showed stable fractures on radiographic imaging, joint dislocation was identified on weightbearing radiographs prior to randomization, leading to exclusion. CONCLUSION: Weightbearing and mobilization using a walking boot may be a safe treatment for patients with stable Weber B fractures.

Pneumomediastinum in late pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Pneumomediastium is a rare complication of pregnancy or labor. METHODS: Here, we report our findings in a case report (gravid 5, para 2, gestational age 33 + 4 weeks) and narratively review the current literature on pneumomediastinum in pregnancy or labor. RESULTS: Our case is the first case that experienced pneumomediastinum after relatively limited exposure to barotrauma in the current pregnancy. Other reports describe pneumomediastinum after hyperemesis gravidarum or during labor. Treatment is usually conservatively due to the trauma mechanism of barotrauma to the alveoli. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the possibility of pneumomediastinum in pregnant women with acute thoracic pain in cases of (previous) hyperemesis gravidarum or during labor.

[Pectus excavatum: not just a cosmetic problem]. / Trechterborst: niet alleen een cosmetisch probleem.

Pectus excavatum is the most common deformity of the anterior chest wall. Nevertheless, awareness amongst physicians is lacking and consequences of the diagnosis are often underestimated. Symptoms include cardiopulmonary symptoms such as palpitations, fatigue and exercise intolerance. Moreover, patients often have psychosocial problems and suffer from poor body image and lower quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for diagnostic work-up and treatment, involving dedicated paediatricians, cardiologists and surgeons. Treatment can be non-surgical or surgical. Conservative options include physiotherapy and vacuum bell therapy. In symptomatic patients, surgical treatment is warranted from the age of 12-14 years. Minimally invasive repair with the Nuss bar technique is considered the gold standard for adolescents. Patients who are unsuitable for minimally invasive repair can be treated with open surgical correction, for example, via a modified Ravitch procedure. Early referral to a specialised centre is recommended.

Early and mid-term results of a prospective observational study comparing emergency endovascular aneurysm repair with open surgery in both ruptured and unruptured acute abdominal aortic aneurysms.

The aim of the paper is to prospectively describe early and mid-term outcomes for emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) versus open surgery in acute abdominal aortic aneurysms (aAAAs), both unruptured (symptomatic) and ruptured. We enrolled all consecutive patients treated for aAAA at our center between April 2002 and April 2008. The main outcome parameters were 30-day, 6- and 12-month mortality (all-cause and aneurysm-related). Two hundred forty patients were enrolled in the study. In the unruptured aAAA group (n = 111), 47 (42%) underwent eEVAR. The 30-day, 6- and 12-month mortality rates were 6, 13 and 15% in the eEVAR group versus 11% (NS), 13% (NS) and 16% (NS) in the open group, respectively. In the ruptured aAAA group (n = 129), 25 (19%) underwent eEVAR (mortality rates: 20, 28 and 36%, respectively) compared with 104 (81%) patients who underwent open surgery (mortality rates: 45% (P = 0.021), 60% (P = 0.004) and 63% (P = 0.014), respectively). In conclusion, the present study showed a reduced 30-day, 6- and 12-month mortality of eEVAR compared with open surgery in all patients with aAAA, mainly due to a lower mortality in the ruptured aAAA group. Late aneurysm-related mortality occurred only in the eEVAR group.

EVAR suitability is not a predictor for early and midterm mortality after open ruptured AAA repair.

OBJECTIVE: The reported mortality reduction of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) compared with open repair in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), as observed in observational studies, might be flawed by selection bias based on anatomical suitability for eEVAR. In the present study, we compared mortality in EVAR suitable versus non-EVAR-suitable patients with a ruptured AAA who were all treated with conventional open repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all patients presenting with a suspected rAAA, computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning was performed. All consecutive patients with a confirmed rAAA on preoperative CTA scan and treated with open repair between April 2002 and April 2008 were included. Anatomical suitability for eEVAR was determined by two blinded independent reviewers. Outcomes evaluated were mortality (intra-operative, 30-day, and 6-month), morbidity, complications requiring re-intervention and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 107 consecutive patients presented with a rAAA and underwent preoperative CTA scanning. In 25 patients, eEVAR was performed. In the 82 patients who underwent open repair, CTA showed an EVAR-suitable rAAA in 33 patients (41.8%) and a non-EVAR-suitable rAAA in 49 patients. Thirty-day and 6-month mortality rate was 15/33 (45.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 28.1-63.7) and 18/33 (54.5%; 95% CI 36.4-71.9) in the EVAR-suitable group versus 24/49 (49.0%; 95% CI 34.4-63.7) (P=0.75) and 29/49 (59.2%; 95% CI 44.2-73.0) (P=0.68) in the non-EVAR-suitable group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that anatomical suitability for EVAR is not associated with lower early and midterm mortality in patients treated with open ruptured AAA repair. Therefore, the reported reduction in mortality between eEVAR and open repair is unlikely due to selection bias based on anatomical AAA configuration.