Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Oncotarget ; 9(56): 30869-30882, 2018 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30112114

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. There is increasing interest in developing specific markers to serve as predictors of response to sorafenib and to guide targeted therapy. Using a sequencing platform designed to study somatic mutations in a selection of 112 genes (HepatoExome), we aimed to characterize lesions from HCC patients and cell lines, and to use the data to study the biological and mechanistic effects of case-specific targeted therapies used alone or in combination with sorafenib. We characterized 331 HCC cases in silico and 32 paired samples obtained prospectively from primary tumors of HCC patients. Each case was analyzed in a time compatible with the requirements of the clinic (within 15 days). In 53% of the discovery cohort cases, we detected unique mutational signatures, with up to 34% of them carrying mutated genes with the potential to guide therapy. In a panel of HCC cell lines, each characterized by a specific mutational signature, sorafenib elicited heterogeneous mechanistic and biological responses, whereas targeted therapy provoked the robust inhibition of cell proliferation and DNA synthesis along with the blockage of AKT/mTOR signaling. The combination of sorafenib with targeted therapies exhibited synergistic anti-HCC biological activity concomitantly with highly effective inhibition of MAPK and AKT/mTOR signaling. Thus, somatic mutations may lead to identify case-specific mechanisms of disease in HCC lesions arising from multiple etiologies. Moreover, targeted therapies guided by molecular characterization, used alone or in combination with sorafenib, can effectively block important HCC disease mechanisms.

2.
J Hepatol ; 56 Suppl 1: S75-87, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22300468

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly prevalent and lethal neoplasia, the management of which has significantly improved during the last few years. A better knowledge of the natural history of the tumor and the development of staging systems that stratify patients according to the characteristics of the tumor, the liver disease, and the performance status, such as the BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) system, have led to a better prediction of prognosis and to a most appropriate treatment approach. Today curative therapies (resection, transplantation, ablation) can improve survival in patients diagnosed at an early HCC stage and offer a potential long-term cure. Patients with intermediate stage HCC benefit from chemoembolization and those diagnosed at advanced stage benefit from sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects. In this article we review the current management in HCC and the new advances in this field.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Early Detection of Cancer , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Catheter Ablation , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Hepatectomy , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Transplantation , Molecular Targeted Therapy
3.
J Hepatol ; 56(6): 1330-5, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22314428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) improves survival of properly selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Drug eluting beads (DEB) provide a calibrated and homogenous procedure while increasing efficacy. Outcome data applying this technology is lacking, and this is instrumental for clinical decision-making and for trial design. We evaluated the survival of HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE following a strict selection (preserved liver function, absence of symptoms, extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion). METHODS: We registered baseline characteristics, the development of treatment-related adverse events, and the overall survival of all HCC patients treated by DEB-TACE from February 2004 to June 2010. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were treated with DEB-TACE. All but one were cirrhotic, 62.5% HCV+, 95% Child-Pugh A, 41 BCLC-A and 63 BCLC-B. Causes of DEB-TACE treatment in BCLC-A patients were: 35 unfeasible ablation, and six post-treatment recurrences. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, 38 patients had died, two patients had received transplantation and 24 had received sorafenib because of untreatable tumour progression. Median survival of the cohort was 48.6 months (95% CI: 36.9-61.2), while it was 54.2 months in BCLC stage A and 47.7 months in stage B. Median survival after censoring follow-up at time of transplant/sorafenib was 47.7 (95%CI: 37.9-57.5) months. CONCLUSIONS: These data validate the safety of DEB-TACE and show that the survival expectancy applying current selection criteria and technique is better than that previously reported. A 50% survival at 4 years should be considered when suggesting treatment for patients fitting into controversial scenarios such as expanded criteria for transplantation/resection for multifocal HCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benzenesulfonates/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Female , Hepatic Artery , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Research Design , Sorafenib
4.
Hepatology ; 55(5): 1551-61, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22183941

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical effect of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis are poorly known. This work was a prospective evaluation in two series of cirrhotic patients admitted with infection or developing infection during hospitalization. The first series was studied between 2005 and 2007 (507 bacterial infections in 223 patients) and the second between 2010 and 2011 (162 bacterial infections in 110 patients). In the first series, 32% of infections were community acquired (CA), 32% healthcare associated (HCA), and 36% nosocomial. Multiresistant bacteria (92 infections; 18%) were isolated in 4%, 14%, and 35% of these infections, respectively (P < 0.001). Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E; n = 43) was the main multiresistant organism identified, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 17), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 14), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 14). The efficacy of currently recommended empirical antibiotic therapy was very low in nosocomial infections (40%), compared to HCA and CA episodes (73% and 83%, respectively; P < 0.0001), particularly in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia (26%, 29%, and 44%, respectively). Septic shock (26% versus 10%; P < 0.0001) and mortality rate (25% versus 12%; P = 0.001) were significantly higher in infections caused by multiresistant strains. Nosocomial origin of infection (hazard ratio [HR], 4.43), long-term norfloxacin prophylaxis (HR, 2.69), recent infection by multiresistant bacteria (HR, 2.45), and recent use of ß-lactams (HR, 2.39) were independently associated with the development of multiresistant infections. Results in the second series were similar to those observed in the first series. CONCLUSIONS: Multiresistant bacteria, especially ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, are frequently isolated in nosocomial and, to a lesser extent, HCA infections in cirrhosis, rendering third-generation cephalosporins clinically ineffective. New antibiotic strategies tailored according to the local epidemiological patterns are needed for the empirical treatment of nosocomial infections in cirrhosis.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Liver Cirrhosis/microbiology , Aged , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
5.
Hepatology ; 51(6): 2020-9, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20512990

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to describe the imaging features by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in cirrhosis patients. We registered the CEUS images of cirrhosis patients with histologically confirmed ICC. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to confirm the diagnosis and/or staging purposes. A total of 21 patients met all the criteria to be included in the study. The median nodule size was 32 mm. All nodules showed contrast enhancement at arterial phase; in 10 cases it was homogeneous and in 11 cases peripheral (rim-like). All nodules displayed washout during the venous phases; it appeared during the first 60 seconds in 10 nodules, between 60-120 seconds in five cases, and in six cases after 2 minutes. Ten nodules (five larger than 2 cm) displayed homogeneous contrast uptake followed by washout and they correspond to the specific pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria. However, none of these lesions displayed washout on MRI. CONCLUSION: CEUS should not be used as the sole imaging technique for conclusive hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and if the MRI does not display the diagnostic vascular pattern, a confirmatory biopsy is mandatory.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/diagnostic imaging , Cholangiocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/blood supply , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Cholangiocarcinoma/blood supply , Cholangiocarcinoma/complications , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Neoplasms/blood supply , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Phospholipids , Sulfur Hexafluoride , Ultrasonography
6.
Dig Liver Dis ; 42 Suppl 3: S242-8, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20547310

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the wide implementation of surveillance programs has led to diagnose HCC at earlier stages, when curative options can be applied. In order to obtain the best results, treatment indication should take into account the estimation of baseline life expectancy. Patients at an early stage are those with single HCC or up to three nodules <3 cm with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A-B) and no cancer related symptoms. These patients should be evaluated for any of the therapies that can offer complete responses with potential long-term cure, as reflected by a 5 years survival superior to 50-70%. These include surgical resection, liver transplantation and ablation. We briefly reviewed therapeutic management for early HCC, taking into account that any recommendation should be delivered in the clinical setting and based on an individualised evaluation of each patient.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Precision Medicine , Ablation Techniques , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/pathology , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection
7.
Semin Liver Dis ; 30(1): 61-74, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20175034

ABSTRACT

Staging and treatment indication are relevant topics in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and for optimal results, they have to take into account liver function, tumor stage, and physical status. For any staging system to be meaningful it has to link staging with treatment indication; this should be based on robust scientific data. Currently, the sole proposal that serves both aims is the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) approach. It takes into account the relevant parameters of all important dimensions and divides patients into very early/early, intermediate, advanced, and end-stage. Early-stage HCC patients should be considered for potentially curative options such as resection, ablation, and transplantation. Patients at intermediate stage benefit from chemoembolization, whereas patients at an advanced stage, or who cannot benefit from options of higher priority, have sorafenib as the standard treatment. Finally, patients at end-stage should merely receive palliative care.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/standards , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Benzenesulfonates/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Forecasting , Hepatectomy/methods , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Transplantation/methods , Male , Neoplasm Staging/trends , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds , Prognosis , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Sorafenib , Spain , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
9.
Hepatology ; 50(3): 791-8, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19610049

ABSTRACT

This study assesses the magnetic resonance (MR) features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in patients with cirrhosis with specific analysis of the contrast enhancement pattern. Cholangiocarcinoma may show increased contrast uptake in the arterial phase, and, if washout in the delayed venous phase were to be detected, the noninvasive diagnostic criteria proposed in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines would be refuted. We reviewed the MR findings of 25 patients with cirrhosis with 31 histologically confirmed ICC nodules. Signal intensity on basal T1-weighted and T2-weighted images and characteristics of enhancement after contrast administration on arterial, portal, and delayed phase were registered. Enhancement pattern was defined according to the behavior of the lesions in each phase, and dynamic pattern was described according to the progression of enhancement throughout the different phases. The most frequent pattern displayed by ICC was a progressive contrast uptake (80.6%). Stable contrast enhancement was registered in 19.4%. None of the ICCs showed a washout pattern, a profile that is specific for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The ICC dynamic behavior differed significantly according to tumor size: progressive enhancement pattern was the most frequent (20 of 25 cases) in lesions larger than 20 mm, whereas the stable pattern was mainly identified in nodules smaller than 20 mm. The most characteristic MR contrast pattern in ICC in cirrhosis is a progressive contrast uptake throughout the different phases, whereas contrast washout at delayed phases is not observed. Because stable enhancement pattern without washout also can be registered in small HCC nodules, the evaluation of delayed phase is mandatory for a proper nodule characterization. If washout is not registered, a biopsy should be mandatory for diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Cholangiocarcinoma/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Aged , Bile Duct Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology , Contrast Media , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Liver/pathology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
10.
Cancer ; 115(3): 616-23, 2009 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19117042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of response to treatment is a key aspect in cancer therapy. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are used in most oncology trials, but those criteria evaluate only unidimensional tumor measurements and disregard the extent of necrosis, which is the target of all effective locoregional therapies. Therefore, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines recommended that assessment of tumor response should incorporate the reduction in viable tumor burden. The current report provides an assessment of the agreement/concordance between both RECIST and the EASL guidelines for the evaluation of response to therapy. METHODS: The authors evaluated a cohort of 55 patients within prospective studies, including 24 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and 31 patients who underwent percutaneous ablation (percutaneous ethanol injection [PEI]/radiofrequency [RF]). Triphasic helical computed tomography scans were performed at baseline, at 1 month, and at 3 months after procedure, and 2 independent radiologists evaluated tumor response. RESULTS: Evaluating response according to RECIST criteria, no patients achieved a complete response (CR), 21.8% of patients achieved a partial response (PR) (none in the PEI/RF group), 47.3% of patients had stable disease (SD), and 30.9% of patients had progressive disease (PD). When response was evaluated according to the EASL guidelines, 54.5% of patients achieved a CR, 27.3% of patients achieved a PR, 3.6% of patients had SD, and 14.5% had PD. The kappa coefficient was 0.193 (95% confidence interval, 0.0893-0.2967; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: RECIST missed all CRs and underestimated the extent of partial tumor response because of tissue necrosis, wrongly assessing the therapeutic efficacy of locoregional therapies. This evaluation should incorporate the reduction in viable tumor burden as recognized by nonenhanced areas on dynamic imaging studies.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Administration, Cutaneous , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Catheter Ablation , Cohort Studies , Embolization, Therapeutic , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Tumor Burden
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...