Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 15(5): 497-503, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17103197

ABSTRACT

GOALS OF WORK: The present study sought to determine the prevalence of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) across ten community oncology settings. The effect of CINV on quality of life (QOL) was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancer patients who were scheduled for their first cycle of a new chemotherapy regimen were recruited from ten community oncology clinics. Study participants recorded occurrence of CINV by completing a daily diary each day for the first 8 days after treatment during each cycle and the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) before chemotherapy, at the end of day 1 and day 6 after chemotherapy. Mixed model regression analysis was used to explore the association between occurrence of CINV at cycle 1 and subsequent cycles and its impact on patient QOL. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients provided information for at least one cycle. During cycle 1, only 33% had neither acute nor delayed CINV. Of the 36% patients who developed acute CINV, 8% developed acute CINV only. Of the 59% who developed delayed CINV, 53% reported delayed only and 47% reported acute and delayed CINV. A similar pattern was seen at cycles 2 and 3. Experience of CINV at cycle 1 was associated with the development of CINV at cycles 2 and 3. Occurrence of CINV significantly interfered with patient QOL as assessed by the FLIE. CONCLUSIONS: CINV remained a substantial problem for patients receiving chemotherapy in this community-based sample, especially delayed CINV. CINV significantly interfered with patient QOL and daily functioning.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Nausea/chemically induced , Quality of Life , Vomiting/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/epidemiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Regression Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Vomiting/epidemiology
2.
Psychosom Med ; 68(4): 555-62, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16868264

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether situational and dispositional optimism were protective against dimensions of distress and aspects of health-related quality of life (HQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing chemotherapy. This study also evaluated whether optimism predicted a decrease in cancer antigen (CA) 125 levels during treatment. METHODS: Ninety women with epithelial ovarian cancer were assessed at the start and end of chemotherapy. Optimism, distress, and HQoL were measured by self-report; CA 125 levels were gathered from patients' medical charts. RESULTS: Both measures of optimism were inversely associated with baseline anxiety, perceived stress, and depression. In addition, situational optimism was positively associated with baseline social and physical well-being, and dispositional optimism was positively associated with baseline social and functional well-being. However, neither measure of optimism predicted domains of distress or HQoL at the follow-up assessment after controlling for baseline levels. Dispositional optimism predicted CA 125 at the end of treatment after controlling for baseline levels. However, neither situational nor dispositional optimism predicted CA 125 falling to normal levels (< or =35 U/mL). CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior research, optimism was inversely associated with distress and positively associated with HQoL in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Higher levels of dispositional optimism at the start of chemotherapy were associated with a greater decline in patients' CA 125 during treatment.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/immunology , Health Status , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/immunology , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Stress, Psychological/blood , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 8(3): 379-92, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16801296

ABSTRACT

Although converging lines of evidence suggest that nicotine and mood are related at a fundamental biological level, this link has not been reliably demonstrated in laboratory studies. In this study, startle probe methodology was used to examine the effects of nicotine administration and deprivation on emotional processes associated with motivation. Smokers (N = 115) completed four laboratory sessions crossing deprivation (12-hr deprived vs. nondeprived) with nicotine spray (active vs. placebo). Participants viewed affective pictures (positive, negative, neutral) and pictures involving cigarette cues, while startle probes were administered. Deprivation decreased startle responding to cigarette cues, suggesting an activation of appetitive processes. Nicotine administration suppressed overall startle responding during deprivation. In addition, during deprivation, random exposure to negative stimuli over two blocks of trials resulted in decreased adaptation of the startle response, suggesting that some sensitization to negative emotional cues may take place during nicotine withdrawal. These effects are consistent with formulations of addiction, stressing that withdrawal may both increase the reinforcement salience of smoking stimuli and decrease habituation to negative emotional stimuli.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/psychology , Adult , Affect , Behavior, Addictive/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Nicotine/adverse effects , Reflex, Startle , Regression Analysis , Reinforcement, Psychology , Saliva/metabolism , Smoking/metabolism , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/metabolism
4.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 20(1): 16-24, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12558840

ABSTRACT

Little is known about pediatricians' counseling and clinical practices to reduce skin cancer risk among their patients. Thus our objectives were to characterize skin cancer preventive counseling and clinical practices in a sample of pediatricians and identify correlates of these practices. Physicians practicing general pediatrics in Harris County, Texas, received a mail survey that assessed their sun protection recommendations and skin cancer preventive counseling and clinical practices. Pediatrician, patient, and medical practice variables were assessed as correlates. Most (76%) pediatricians routinely recommended sunscreen; however, relatively few (24%) suggested reapplying it after prolonged periods outside. About half routinely recommended protective clothing (53%), shade (47%), or limiting midday sun exposure (46%). Even fewer pediatricians routinely discussed skin cancer risk factors, passed out sunscreen samples, made educational materials available, took a family history of skin cancer, or documented risk factors in a patient's chart. More than half reported that they routinely performed full-body skin examinations during a first visit (65%) and annually (56%). Perceived barriers, perceived relevance of skin cancer prevention, and personal sun protection practices were important factors associated with professional practices in this sample. Interventions are needed to increase pediatricians' counseling and clinical practices to reduce skin cancer risk among patients.


Subject(s)
Health Education/methods , Pediatrics/standards , Primary Prevention/standards , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child , Child, Preschool , Counseling , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pediatrics/trends , Preventive Medicine/methods , Primary Prevention/trends , Probability , Risk Assessment , Sampling Studies
5.
Addict Behav ; 27(5): 697-712, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12201378

ABSTRACT

We examined the concurrent and predictive validity of stages of change and susceptibility to smoking with respect to smoking onset among adolescents. We also sought to determine whether concurrent use of the two constructs, in the form of an integrated stage/susceptibility index, would predict adolescent smoking acquisition better than eithe r construct alone. Data were examinedfrom two study populations: a prospective study of 1,124 elementary-school through senior-high-school students and a cross-sectional study of 5,624 high-school students. Both constructs demonstrated good concurrent and predictive validity. A measure integrating the stages of smoking acquisition and susceptibility to smoking constructs was created by dividing the precontemplation group as a function of susceptibility. This new classification system yielded better concurrent and predictive validity than did either stage of smoking acquisition or susceptibility to smoking alone.


Subject(s)
Models, Psychological , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...