Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 37(3): 321-7, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23855180

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine changes in orofacial pain perception in community-based children by assessing the pressure pain threshold (PPT) with an algometer and pain intensity by manual palpation (MP). METHODS: A total of 100 children from the community aged 7 to 12 years were assessed. Thirty-eight children reported pain in the orofacial region. Of these children,10 reported joint pain (GJ), 12 reported joint and muscle pain (GJMM), 5 reported muscle pain (GMM), 11 reported pain during mastication (GMAST), and 62 reported no pain. An ANOVA (p < 0.05) was used to determine the differences in pain intensity and PPT among groups. RESULTS: Significantly higher pain intensity upon MP was observed for the temporalis muscle in the GJMM, GMAST and GJ groups compared to the remaining groups. The PPT values were significantly lower in the masseter temporalis muscles, TMJ and thenar region in the GJMM group compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: MP more accurately differentiated symptomatic subjects from symptom-free TMD subjects, and PPT values were more sensitive to the discrimination of pain in the orofacial sites assessed. In addition, the changes in perception at a larger number of sites among children reporting mixed pain may suggest the presence of a possible mechanism of central sensitization.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/physiopathology , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Pain Perception/classification , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Central Nervous System Sensitization/physiology , Child , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Masseter Muscle/physiopathology , Mastication/physiology , Pain Perception/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Palpation/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temporal Muscle/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/physiopathology , Tendons/physiopathology
2.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol ; 46(5): 269-73, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17059098

ABSTRACT

This study had the goal of determining if the amplitude of the surface electromyograph signals changes in terms of time of analysis and subjects, deaf or normal listeners, when estimated in a 250 ms of length window, visually determined, considering the most stable signal period from the center of the chewing cycle. In order to do this, groups with control subjects, listeners and deaf individuals, who made use of the Brazilian sign language (LIBRAS), were studied. All participants performed continuous 5 s of chewing for the electromyographic recording of the temporalis and masseter muscles. The normalized RMS values of three chewing cycles were compared between and among groups. The results from the Kruskall-Wallis test did not show any statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between the normalized RMS values obtained in the three individual chewing cycles, for each of the two completed and evaluated cycles, in both groups studied. The Mann-Whitney test showed that the mean normalized RMS values obtained in the first chewing cycle were higher for the control group when compared to the mean amplitude values of the first chewing cycle of the group of deaf volunteers. It can be concluded that, in these experimental conditions, the RMS values obtained from the select windows of 250 ms length duration, in relatively stable periods of the electromyographic signal of chewing cycles did not suffer any changes in terms of EMG register duration, in both studied groups, but does give evidence of the differences among the groups.


Subject(s)
Deafness/physiopathology , Masseter Muscle/physiopathology , Mastication/physiology , Temporal Muscle/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Electromyography , Humans , Sign Language , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL