ABSTRACT
Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a pervasive condition that limits quality of life and burdens economies worldwide. Conventional pharmacological treatments primarily aimed at slowing the progression of degeneration have demonstrated limited long-term efficacy and often do not address the underlying causes of the disease. On the other hand, orthobiologics are regenerative agents derived from the patient's own tissue and represent a promising emerging therapy for degenerative disc disease. This review comprehensively outlines the pathophysiology of DDD, highlighting the inadequacies of existing pharmacological therapies and detailing the potential of orthobiologic approaches. It explores advanced tools such as platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cells, providing a historical overview of their development within regenerative medicine, from foundational in vitro studies to preclinical animal models. Moreover, the manuscript delves into clinical trials that assess the effectiveness of these therapies in managing DDD. While the current clinical evidence is promising, it remains insufficient for routine clinical adoption due to limitations in study designs. The review emphasizes the need for further research to optimize these therapies for consistent and effective clinical outcomes, potentially revolutionizing the management of DDD and offering renewed hope for patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To determine time period for hospital discharge and pain and function improvement in patients submitted to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Methods Retrospective evaluation of length of stay and visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Roland-Morris questionnaire results in 32 patients undergoing PELD at the preoperative period and at 2 days and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12 postoperative weeks. Results All patients were discharged in less than 6 hours. There was a statistically significant improvement between the results obtained before the procedure and 2 days postsurgery: the mean VAS for axial pain went from 6.63 to 3.31, the VAS for irradiated pain went from 6.66 to 2.75, the Oswestry score went from 44.59 to 33.17%, and the Roland-Morris score went from 14.03 to 10.34. This difference progressively improved up to 12 weeks in all questionnaires. Regarding the Oswestry score, minimum disability values (19.39%) were observed at 6 weeks. Conclusion All 32 patients were discharged within 6 hours. Pain and function improved significantly after 48 hours, with further significant and progressive improvement until the 3 rd month.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic spinal surgery is becoming quite popular, and the pursuit of a training model to improve surgeons' skills is imperative to overcome the limited availability of human cadavers. Our goal was to determine whether the porcine spine could be a representative model for learning and practicing interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic lumbar procedures (IL-PELPs). METHODS: Lumbar and cervical segments of the porcine cadaver spine were used for the IL-PELP. We have described the technical notes on the difficulties of the procedure and the relevant anatomical features. To endorse the porcine cadaver for this procedure, 5 neurosurgeons underwent 1 day of training and completed a survey. RESULTS: The porcine lumbar spine has small interlaminar windows, and laminectomy is necessary, mimicking the translaminar approaches for higher human lumbar spine levels. The porcine cervical spine has wide and high interlaminar windows and mimics the human L5-S1 interlaminar approach. Entering the spinal canal with the working sheath and endoscope and training the rotation maneuver to access the disc space is only possible in the lumbar segment. It was possible to perform flavectomy and to identify and dissect the dural sac and nerve root in both the lumbar and cervical spine. The neurosurgeons considered the porcine model of good operability and, although different, possible to apply in humans. CONCLUSIONS: The porcine spine is an effective and representative model for learning and practicing IL-PELPs. Although the described anatomical differences should be known, they did not interfere in performing the main surgical steps and maneuvers for IL-PELPs in the porcine model.
