Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Disabil Rehabil ; 46(7): 1366-1373, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37029629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the main biopsychosocial factors associated with disability level after stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with chronic stroke survivors. Disability was assessed using the World Health Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. The independent variables were: Body functions: emotional functioning and whether the dominant upper limb was affected. For the Activities & Participation component, satisfaction regarding the execution of activities and participation were assessed using the SATIS-Stroke, as well as the locomotion ability for adults (ABILOCO), manual ability (ABILHAND) and the return to work. For environmental factors, income and facilitators and obstacles were assessed using the Measure of the Quality of the Environment (MQE). Personal factors: age and sex. Multiple Linear Regression was employed. RESULTS: Limited locomotor ability (ß = -0.281; t = -3.231 p = 0.002), dissatisfaction regarding activities and participation (ß = -0.273; t = -3.070 p = 0.003), and the non-return to work (ß = 0.162; t = 2.085 p = 0.04) were associated with disability. CONCLUSION: The reduction in locomotor ability, dissatisfaction regarding activities and participation and the non-return to work were associated with disability in the chronic phase following a stroke.


The reduction in locomotion ability, dissatisfaction regarding activities and participation, and the non-return to work were associated with disability in the chronic phase following a stroke.Clinicians will be able to develop rehabilitation strategies focused on diminishing locomotor limitations, increasing satisfaction with activities and participation, and improving vocational planning for the return to work after a strokeThese findings underscore the importance of assessments and intervention strategies based on the individual rather than the disease as well as focusing on social and personal issues to guide clinical decision making.


Subject(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Adult , Humans , Stroke Rehabilitation/psychology , International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Stroke/complications , Stroke/psychology , Paresis/etiology , Disability Evaluation , Activities of Daily Living
2.
Disabil Rehabil ; 45(13): 2169-2174, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672154

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. METHODS: Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (≤39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.Implications for rehabilitationWHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity.The WHODAS 2.0 cut-off point of >39.62 allows stratification of post-stroke disability into two different levels (no/mild disability versus moderate/severe disability).These results facilitate clinical decision-making by rehabilitation professionals.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Stroke , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Stroke/complications , Stroke/diagnosis , Activities of Daily Living , World Health Organization
3.
Disabil Rehabil ; 44(24): 7449-7454, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34752176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Propose a way of coding and qualifying HRQoL following a stroke using the codes and qualifiers of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted involving 51 individuals with hemiparesis resulting from a stroke. ICF codes related to the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale were listed and subsequently classified using the generic ICF qualifiers, which range from .0 - no impairment to .4 - complete impairment. A simple mathematic calculation was proposed to convert the SS-QOL scores into ICF qualifiers. RESULTS: The use of the ICF qualifiers revealed that the individuals exhibited a moderate level (.2) of quality of life, with mild impairment (.1) regarding upper limb function, language, self-care, and vision as well as severe impairment (.3) regarding social relations. CONCLUSIONS: The proposal presented in this study allowed qualifying 43 ICF codes related to quality of life after a stroke in a simple, standardized manner, enabling the identification of different levels of impairment on each of the domains of the SS-QOL scale. This coding standardizes the evaluation, facilitates communication between healthcare providers, and systematizes the collection of data and information on health.Implications for rehabilitationProposal for qualifying concepts related to body functions, activity & participation, and environmental factors in a simple, standardized manner.The proposed mathematic calculation is simple and easy to understand, which minimizes the occurrence of errors.Possibility to identify different levels of impairment in each of the domains of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale, facilitating the establishment of individualized, longitudinal care.The ICF codes standardize the evaluation, facilitate communication between healthcare providers, and systematize the collection of data and information on health and functioning.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Stroke , Humans , International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , Disability Evaluation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Stroke/complications , Activities of Daily Living
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...