Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Manag ; 10(4): 235-246, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32564661

ABSTRACT

Aim: To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is more efficient than placebo TENS and control groups for pain relief. Design: Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Setting & participants: A total of 78 adults with postoperative pain, after cholecystectomy, at the University Hospital. They were randomized into active TENS, placebo TENS and control. Intervention: A total of 30-min interventions applied in the first 24 h after the surgery. Outcome: Pain intensity. Results: Pain significantly decreased for both TENS; however, the active TENS was better. A decrease of 2 points or more on the visual analog scale for 53.8% active TENS and 11.5% placebo. Conclusion: There was a greater reduction in pain of important clinical relevance in the active TENS group. Clinical Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trial (REBEC): RBR-6cgx2k.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/standards , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Placebos , Single-Blind Method , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods
2.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 91(8): 652-7, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22311059

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on pain, nausea, and emesis in patients submitted to surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: A clinical single-masked randomized study assessed patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, who were divided into two groups: placebo TENS (G1) and active TENS (G2). The intensity of pain was determined using the visual analog scale and the 11-point Verbal Numerical Scale, applied to the participants before (M1) and 30 mins after (M2) TENS. A conventional biphasic square pulse TENS current was used, at a frequency of 150 Hz and a pulse width of 75 µsecs. The relative risks of the occurrence of nausea and emesis were calculated for groups G1 and G2. Determination of the effect of TENS on analgesia used the Mann-Whitney U test, at a significance level of 5%, to compare independent samples (Dif G1 and Dif G2). RESULTS: The relative risk of nausea and/or emesis was 2.17 times greater for patients from the placebo group. Pain evaluation using the visual analog scale showed median differences between M1 and M2 of 0.4 and 2.4 for groups G1 and G2, respectively. The values obtained using Verbal Numerical Scale were 0.7 (G1) and 3.0 (G2). The active TENS significantly reduced postoperative pain compared with the placebo (P < 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Active TENS promoted significant postoperative pain relief, and fewer complaints of nausea and emesis, in patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...