The Importance of Evaluating Frailty and Social-behavioral Factors for Managing Drugs and Dialysis Prescription in Elderly Patients.

Ageing is characterized by a progressive loss of complexity, which is an essential condition for making the organism capable of keeping homeostasis. Thus, senile loss of complexity makes old individuals frail: a syndrome characterized by the presence of shrinking (sarcopenia), weakness, poor endurance and energy, slowness, and low physical activity. Moreover, renal ageing progressively leads to a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction, one of the main pharmacokinetic senile changes, which is not detectable by simply evaluating serum urea or creatinine values but measuring or calculating patient's GFR. Finally, current epidemiology has documented that detrimental social-behavioral factors such as low education level, poor financial-resource, depression, and isolation, also influence the onset and progression of chronic diseases, and even overall mortality, particularly in the elderly. Thus, we propose that these 3 variables: frailty phenotype, senile GFR, and detrimental social-behavioral factors, should be considered at time of prescribing drugs or medical procedures in the elderly. Additionally, they should also be considered for following patient's response to prescribed therapies in elderly patients suffering from chronic diseases (diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, etc.), or on organ replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation).

Discussion of "Combining Health Data Uses to Ignite Health System Learning".

This article is part of a For-Discussion-Section of Methods of Information in Medicine about the paper "Combining Health Data Uses to Ignite Health System Learning" written by John D. Ainsworth and Iain E. Buchan [1]. It is introduced by an editorial. This article contains the combined commentaries invited to independently comment on the paper of Ainsworth and Buchan. In subsequent issues the discussion can continue through letters to the editor. With these comments on the paper "Combining Health Data Uses to Ignite Health System Learning", written by John D. Ainsworth and Iain E. Buchan [1], the journal seeks to stimulate a broad discussion on new ways for combining data sources for the reuse of health data in order to identify new opportunities for health system learning. An international group of experts has been invited by the editor of Methods to comment on this paper. Each of the invited commentaries forms one section of this paper.

Discussion of "Biomedical informatics: we are what we publish".

This article is part of a For-Discussion-Section of Methods of Information in Medicine about the paper "Biomedical Informatics: We Are What We Publish", written by Peter L. Elkin, Steven H. Brown, and Graham Wright. It is introduced by an editorial. This article contains the combined commentaries invited to independently comment on the Elkin et al. paper. In subsequent issues the discussion can continue through letters to the editor.

Discussion of "Attitude of physicians towards automatic alerting in computerized physician order entry systems".

With these comments on the paper "Attitude of Physicians Towards Automatic Alerting in Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems", written by Martin Jung and co-authors, with Dr. Elske Ammenwerth as senior author [1], the journal wants to stimulate a broad discussion on computerized physician order entry systems. An international group of experts have been invited by the editor of Methods to comment on this paper. Each of the invited commentaries forms one section of this paper.