Fabry patients' experiences with the timing of diagnosis relevant for the discussion on newborn screening.

This study aimed to explore Fabry disease (FD) patients' experiences with the timing of their diagnosis and identify important patient-oriented themes relevant to discussions about the need for newborn screening (NBS) for this disorder. Thirty FD patients (13 males) were included in a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed to identify themes that captured the patients' experiences. The interview analysis revealed six relevant themes. One of these was the impact of a delayed diagnosis on severely affected patients, who often felt misunderstood and were frequently misdiagnosed. In contrast, some patients mentioned the drawbacks of presymptomatic diagnosis, which was associated with labeling and medicalization. In addition, the ability to anticipate future FD-related problems was considered both an advantage and a disadvantage of early diagnosis. Still, patients reported that they felt that an early FD diagnosis could prevent disease progression through the timely initiation of treatment. This study identified several relevant themes that reflect both the phenotypic heterogeneity of the disease and the substantial differences between patients' experiences with and without FD symptoms before diagnosis and among the patients in each group. These results add considerable nuances to the discussion about NBS programs for FD and should be incorporated into the debate.

Plasma and urinary levels of dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate derived disaccharides after long-term enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in MPS I: correlation with the timing of ERT and with total urinary excretion of glycosaminoglycans.

INTRODUCTION: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) results in a defective breakdown of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate, which leads to a progressive disease. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) results in clearance of these GAGs from a range of tissues and can significantly ameliorate several symptoms. The biochemical efficacy of ERT is generally assessed by the determination of the total urinary excretion of GAGs. However, this has limitations. We studied the concentrations of heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate derived disaccharides (HS and DS, respectively) in the plasma and urine of seven patients and compared these levels with total urinary GAGs (uGAGs) levels. METHODS: Plasma and urine samples were collected at different time points relative to the weekly ERT for three non-consecutive weeks in seven MPS I patients who had been treated with ERT for at least 2.5 years. Heparan and dermatan sulfate in plasma and urine were enzymatically digested into disaccharides, and HS and DS levels were determined by HPLC-MS/MS analysis. uGAGs were measured by the DMB test. RESULTS: The levels of HS and DS were markedly decreased compared with the levels before the initiation of ERT. However, the concentrations of DS in plasma and of both HS and DS in urine remained significantly elevated in all studied patients, while in six patients the level of total uGAGs had normalized. The concentrations of plasma and urinary HS during the weekly ERT followed a U-shaped curve. However, the effect size is small. The concentrations of plasma and urinary DS and uGAGs appeared to be in a steady state. CONCLUSIONS: HS and DS are sensitive biomarkers for monitoring the biochemical treatment efficacy of ERT and remain elevated despite long-term treatment. This finding may be related to the labeled dose or antibody status of the patient. The timing of the sample collection is not relevant, at least at the current dose of 100 IU/kg/weekly.

Heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate derived disaccharides are sensitive markers for newborn screening for mucopolysaccharidoses types I, II and III.

INTRODUCTION: Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) are a group of lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) caused by a defect in the degradation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). The accumulation of GAGs in MPS patients results in extensive, severe and progressive disease. Disease modifying therapy is available for three of the MPSs and is being developed for the other types. Early initiation of treatment, before the onset of irreversible tissue damage, clearly provides a favorable disease outcome. However, early diagnosis is difficult due to the rarity of these disorders in combination with the wide variety of clinical symptoms. Newborn screening (NBS) is probably the optimal approach, and several screening techniques for different MPSs have been studied. Here we describe a relatively simple and sensitive method to measure levels of dermatan and heparan sulfate derived disaccharides in dried blood spots (DBS) with HPLC-MS/MS, and show that this reliably separates MPS I, II and MPS III newborns from controls and heterozygotes. METHODS: Newborn DBS of 11 MPS I, 1 MPS II, and 6 MPS III patients, with phenotypes ranging from severe to relatively attenuated, were collected and levels of dermatan and heparan sulfate derived disaccharides in these DBS were compared with levels in DBS of newborn MPS I and MPS III heterozygotes and controls. RESULTS: The levels of dermatan and heparan sulfate derived disaccharides were clearly elevated in all newborn DBS of MPS I, II and III patients when compared to controls. In contrast, DBS of MPS I and III heterozygotes showed similar disaccharide levels when compared to control DBS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that measurement of heparan and dermatan sulfate derived disaccharides in DBS may be suitable for NBS for MPS I, II and MPS III. We hypothesize that this same approach will also detect MPS VI, and VII patients, as heparan sulfate and/or dermatan sulfate is also the primary storage products in these disorders.

Experiences of parents and patients with the timing of Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) diagnoses and its relevance to the ethical debate on newborn screening.

INTRODUCTION: Newborn screening (NBS) techniques have been developed for several lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs), including Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I). MPS I is an LSD with a wide phenotypic spectrum that ranges from the severe Hurler phenotype to the attenuated Scheie phenotype. To improve the ethical discussion about NBS for MPS I, we performed an interview study to explore the experiences of MPS I patients and their parents with the timings of their diagnoses. METHODS: We used a qualitative research approach consisting of 17 interviews with the parents of patients with all MPS I phenotypes and with patients with attenuated forms of MPS I. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and subsequently analyzed to identify the main themes identified by the participants. RESULTS: Five important themes, focusing on the experienced disadvantages of delayed diagnosis and the advantages and disadvantages of a hypothetical earlier diagnosis, were identified in our group of participants: 1) delayed diagnosis causing parental frustration, 2) delayed diagnosis causing patient frustration, 3) early diagnosis enabling reproductive decision-making, 4) early diagnosis enabling focusing on the diagnosis, and 5) early diagnosis enabling timely initiation of treatment. There was a remarkable similarity in the experiences with timing of diagnosis between parents of patients with the severe and the attenuated forms. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to explore the personal experiences of MPS I patients and their parents with diagnostic timing. Our study identified five important themes that are highly relevant to the ethical discussion on expanding NBS programs for MPS I.

Capturing phenotypic heterogeneity in MPS I: results of an international consensus procedure.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is traditionally divided into three phenotypes: the severe Hurler (MPS I-H) phenotype, the intermediate Hurler-Scheie (MPS I-H/S) phenotype and the attenuated Scheie (MPS I-S) phenotype. However, there are no clear criteria for delineating the different phenotypes. Because decisions about optimal treatment (enzyme replacement therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) need to be made quickly and depend on the presumed phenotype, an assessment of phenotypic severity should be performed soon after diagnosis. Therefore, a numerical severity scale for classifying different MPS I phenotypes at diagnosis based on clinical signs and symptoms was developed. METHODS: A consensus procedure based on a combined modified Delphi method and a nominal group technique was undertaken. It consisted of two written rounds and a face-to-face meeting. Sixteen MPS I experts participated in the process. The main goal was to identify the most important indicators of phenotypic severity and include these in a numerical severity scale. The correlation between the median subjective expert MPS I rating and the scores derived from this severity scale was used as an indicator of validity. RESULTS: Full consensus was reached on six key clinical items for assessing severity: age of onset of signs and symptoms, developmental delay, joint stiffness/arthropathy/contractures, kyphosis, cardiomyopathy and large head/frontal bossing. Due to the remarkably large variability in the expert MPS I assessments, however, a reliable numerical scale could not be constructed. Because of this variability, such a scale would always result in patients whose calculated severity score differed unacceptably from the median expert severity score, which was considered to be the 'gold standard'. CONCLUSIONS: Although consensus was reached on the six key items for assessing phenotypic severity in MPS I, expert opinion on phenotypic severity at diagnosis proved to be highly variable. This subjectivity emphasizes the need for validated biomarkers and improved genotype-phenotype correlations that can be incorporated into phenotypic severity assessments at diagnosis.

Enzyme replacement therapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at diagnosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of a European consensus procedure.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a lysosomal storage disorder that results in the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans causing progressive multi-organ dysfunction. Its clinical spectrum is very broad and varies from the severe Hurler phenotype (MPS I-H) which is characterized by early and progressive central nervous system (CNS) involvement to the attenuated Scheie phenotype (MPS I-S) with no CNS involvement. Indication, optimal timing, safety and efficacy of the two available treatment options for MPS I, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), are subject to continuing debate. A European consensus procedure was organized to reach consensus about the use of these two treatment strategies. METHODS: A panel of specialists, including 8 specialists for metabolic disorders and 7 bone marrow transplant physicians, all with acknowledged expertise in MPS I, participated in a modified Delphi process to develop consensus-based statements on MPS I treatment. Fifteen MPS I case histories were used to initiate the discussion and to anchor decisions around either treatment mode. Before and at the meeting all experts gave their opinion on the cases (YES/NO transplantation) and reasons for their decisions were collected. A set of draft statements on MPS I treatment options composed by a planning committee were discussed and revised during the meeting until full consensus. RESULTS: Full consensus was reached on several important issues, including the following: 1) The preferred treatment for patients with MPS I-H diagnosed before age 2.5 yrs is HSCT; 2) In individual patients with an intermediate phenotype HSCT may be considered if there is a suitable donor. However, there are no data on efficacy of HSCT in patients with this phenotype; 3) All MPS I patients including those who have not been transplanted or whose graft has failed may benefit significantly from ERT; 4) ERT should be started at diagnosis and may be of value in patients awaiting HSCT. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary consensus procedure yielded consensus on the main issues related to therapeutic choices and research for MPS I. This is an important step towards an international, collaborative approach, the only way to obtain useful evidence in rare diseases.