Long-term follow-up with MRI scans after enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannomas: results from a single center case series.

BACKGROUND: Enucleation is a surgical technique to resect peripheral nerve schwannomas. The procedure has a low risk for postoperative deficit, but a small chance for recurrence, because tumor cells may remain inside the pseudocapsule that is left after resection. MRI scans are frequently performed after surgery to investigate potential residual tumor, but currently there is little information in the literature on the value of follow-up with MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients that underwent enucleation of a peripheral nerve schwannoma between October 2013 and June 2022 were included. Postoperative MRI scans (Gadolinium enhanced) made at different time-points after the surgery were re-examined for residual enhancement. Patients with residual enhancement were contacted to inform whether symptoms had recurred. RESULTS: A total of 75 schwannoma enucleations in 74 patients were included. The first postoperative MRI scan, performed three months after the surgery, showed no residual enhancement in 50 patients. In the remaining 24 patients, another MRI scan was made one year after the surgery, which still showed a possible remnant in 11 patients. On the third MRI scan, performed two years after enucleation, there were seven suspected cases (9%). None of these patients had clinical symptoms at a mean postoperative follow-up of five years. CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that the value of postoperative MRI scans after enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannomas is limited, because residual enhancement in the beginning can be non-specific and the small percentage of patients, that persistently had a potential remnant, were all asymptomatic.

Early versus delayed cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: a multicenter observational study within CENTER-TBI and Net-QuRe.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of early (≤ 90 days) and delayed (> 90 days) cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: The authors analyzed participants enrolled in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) and the Neurotraumatology Quality Registry (Net-QuRe) studies who were diagnosed with TBI and underwent DC and subsequent cranioplasty. These prospective, multicenter, observational cohort studies included 5091 patients enrolled from 2014 to 2020. The effect of cranioplasty timing on functional outcome was evaluated with multivariable ordinal regression and with propensity score matching (PSM) in a sensitivity analysis of functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE] score) and quality of life (Quality of Life After Brain Injury [QOLIBRI] instrument) at 12 months following DC. RESULTS: Among 173 eligible patients, 73 (42%) underwent early cranioplasty and 100 (58%) underwent delayed cranioplasty. In the ordinal logistic regression and PSM, similar 12-month GOSE scores were found between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.61-1.21 and 0.88, 95% CI 0.48-1.65, respectively). In the ordinal logistic regression, early cranioplasty was associated with a higher risk for hydrocephalus than that with delayed cranioplasty (aOR 4.0, 95% CI 1.2-16). Postdischarge seizure rates (early cranioplasty: aOR 1.73, 95% CI 0.7-4.7) and QOLIBRI scores (ß -1.9, 95% CI -9.1 to 9.6) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcome and quality of life were similar between early and delayed cranioplasty in patients who had undergone DC for TBI. Neurosurgeons may consider performing cranioplasty during the index admission (early) to simplify the patient's chain of care and prevent readmission for cranioplasty but should be vigilant for an increased possibility of hydrocephalus. Clinical trial registration nos.: CENTER-TBI, NCT02210221 (clinicaltrials.gov); Net-QuRe, NTR6003 (trialsearch.who.int) and NL5761 (onderzoekmetmensen.nl).

Tibial intraneural ganglion cysts arising from the tibiofemoral joint: illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND: Intraneural cysts involving the tibial nerve in the knee region (popliteal fossa) are rare. According to the articular (synovial) theory, which posits a joint origin for this pathology, these cysts originate from either the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) or the tibiofemoral (knee) joint. As tibial intraneural cysts arising from the tibiofemoral joint remain poorly understood, the authors present 2 illustrative cases and a review of the world's literature on all tibial intraneural ganglion cysts in the knee region. OBSERVATIONS: Fourteen cases of tibial intraneural ganglion cysts arising from the tibiofemoral joint were identified in the literature. Different articular branch patterns were demonstrated, which could be explained by the varied, rich articular branch innervation at the knee. Favorable outcomes were observed in cases in which the articular branch had been disconnected and the cyst drained and were comparable to the outcomes seen in tibial intraneural ganglion cysts with an STFJ origin. LESSONS: Tibial intraneural cysts in the knee region can be subdivided by their joint of origin: the STFJ or the tibiofemoral joint. Those arising from the tibiofemoral joint originate from different areas of the joint and propagate in predictable patterns, with favorable outcomes following surgical intervention when the joint connection is identified and treated. The origin of tibial intraneural cysts from the tibiofemoral joint are more complex than those originating from the STFJ but seem to have similar propagation patterns and outcomes.

Early surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with traumatic intracerebral hematoma: a CENTER-TBI study.

PURPOSE: Evidence regarding the effect of surgery in traumatic intracerebral hematoma (t-ICH) is limited and relies on the STITCH(Trauma) trial. This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness of early surgery to conservative treatment in patients with a t-ICH. METHODS: In a prospective cohort, we included patients with a large t-ICH (< 48 h of injury). Primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 6 months, analyzed with multivariable proportional odds logistic regression. Subgroups included injury severity and isolated vs. non-isolated t-ICH. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients with a large t-ICH were included, of whom 160 received early surgery and 207 received conservative treatment. Patients receiving early surgery were younger (median age 54 vs. 58 years) and more severely injured (median Glasgow Coma Scale 7 vs. 10) compared to those treated conservatively. In the overall cohort, early surgery was not associated with better functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.1, (95% CI, 0.6-1.7)) compared to conservative treatment. Early surgery was associated with better outcome for patients with moderate TBI and isolated t-ICH (AOR 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-2.0); P value for interaction 0.71, and AOR 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5); P value for interaction 0.004). Conversely, in mild TBI and those with a smaller t-ICH (< 33 cc), conservative treatment was associated with better outcome (AOR 0.6 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9); P value for interaction 0.71, and AOR 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.0); P value for interaction 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Early surgery in t-ICH might benefit those with moderate TBI and isolated t-ICH, comparable with results of the STITCH(Trauma) trial.

Comparative effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study.

Background: Limited evidence existed on the comparative effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) versus craniotomy for evacuation of traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) until the recently published randomised clinical trial RESCUE-ASDH. In this study, that ran concurrently, we aimed to determine current practice patterns and compare outcomes of primary DC versus craniotomy. Methods: We conducted an analysis of centre treatment preference within the prospective, multicentre, observational Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (known as CENTER-TBI) and NeuroTraumatology Quality Registry (known as Net-QuRe) studies, which enrolled patients throughout Europe and Israel (2014-2020). We included patients with an ASDH who underwent acute neurosurgical evacuation. Patients with severe pre-existing neurological disorders were excluded. In an instrumental variable analysis, we compared outcomes between centres according to treatment preference, measured by the case-mix adjusted proportion DC per centre. The primary outcome was functional outcome rated by the 6-months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, estimated with ordinal regression as a common odds ratio (OR), adjusted for prespecified confounders. Variation in centre preference was quantified with the median odds ratio (MOR). CENTER-TBI is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, and the Resource Identification Portal (Research Resource Identifier SCR_015582). Findings: Between December 19, 2014 and December 17, 2017, 4559 patients with traumatic brain injury were enrolled in CENTER-TBI of whom 336 (7%) underwent acute surgery for ASDH evacuation; 91 (27%) underwent DC and 245 (63%) craniotomy. The proportion primary DC within total acute surgery cases ranged from 6 to 67% with an interquartile range (IQR) of 12-26% among 46 centres; the odds of receiving a DC for prognostically similar patients in one centre versus another randomly selected centre were trebled (adjusted median odds ratio 2.7, p < 0.0001). Higher centre preference for DC over craniotomy was not associated with better functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio (OR) per 14% [IQR increase] more DC in a centre = 0.9 [95% CI 0.7-1.1], n = 200). Primary DC was associated with more follow-on surgeries and complications [secondary cranial surgery 27% vs. 18%; shunts 11 vs. 5%]; and similar odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR per 14% IQR more primary DC 1.3 [95% CI (1.0-3.4), n = 200]). Interpretation: We found substantial practice variation in the employment of DC over craniotomy for ASDH. This variation in treatment strategy did not result in different functional outcome. These findings suggest that primary DC should be restricted to salvageable patients in whom immediate replacement of the bone flap is not possible due to intraoperative brain swelling. Funding: Hersenstichting Nederland for the Dutch NeuroTraumatology Quality Registry and the European Union Seventh Framework Program.

Sonographic normal values for the cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Nerve size is a commonly used sonographic parameter when assessing suspected entrapment of the ulnar nerve. We aimed to create a robust set of normal values, based on a critical review of published normal values. METHODS: We performed a systematic evaluation of studies on normal ulnar nerve sizes, identified in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Using meta-analyses, we determined pooled mean cross-sectional area (CSA) values for different anatomical locations of the ulnar nerve throughout the arm. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, probe frequency, in- or exclusion of diabetic patients, position of the elbow and Asian versus other populations. RESULTS: We identified 90 studies of which 77 studies were included for further analyses after quality review, resulting in data from 5772 arms of 3472 participants. Subgroup analyses show lower CSA values at at the wrist crease and proximal to the wrist crease when using low frequency probes (< 15 MHz) and at the wrist crease, proximal to the wrist crease, proximal forearm and the distal upper arm in Asians. CSA values were lower when in flexed position compared to extended position for the cubital tunnel inlet only. No difference was found for gender. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review provides a comprehensive set of normal values at sites along the entire length of the ulnar nerve. This provides a foundation for clinical practise and upon which future studies could be more systematically compared.

Targeted muscle reinnervation for a recurrent traumatic neuroma of the sural nerve: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic neuromata often recur after resection. Recently, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to be a promising alternative for the treatment of traumatic neuroma, also in nonamputees. This case shows that TMR can also be applied for this indication in recurrent traumatic neuroma. OBSERVATIONS: A 55-year-old patient with a history of cerebral palsy presented with a painful swelling in his right knee, 40 years after multiple Achilles tendon surgeries for contractures. On imaging, the lesion was suspect for a traumatic neuroma of the posterior sural nerve. After two failed resections, TMR was performed by connecting the proximal end of the sural nerve to the motor branch of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle. During outpatient visits at 3, 6, and 12 months, the patient reported significantly less pain compared to before the TMR. He had no weakness of plantar flexion. Postoperative imaging, however, showed atrophy of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle. LESSONS: This case shows that TMR can be a successful strategy to treat recurrent traumatic neuroma after previous failed transection of single neuromata in nonamputee cases. In the authors' patient, TMR did not result in motor deficit, but more research is needed to investigate this consequence of TMR for this indication.

Submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for persistent or recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome: Results of a prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Submuscular transposition (SMT) of the ulnar nerve is frequently performed as secondary procedure in patients with persistent or recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) despite previous surgery. Good results have been reported for this surgical strategy, but mainly in small retrospective case series. The goal of the present study is therefore to analyze the results prospectively using a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM): patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation (PRUNE). METHODS: SMT of the ulnar nerve was performed in 30 consecutive patients who were referred because of persistent or recurrent CuTS despite previous surgery. Objective outcome was measured in the outpatient clinic using the Likert scale. The PRUNE questionnaire was obtained pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgery. Simultaneously, 20 patients with primary surgery for CuTS, that underwent simple decompression, were followed. RESULTS: Good outcome (Likert 1 or 2) was obtained in 67% after SMT for persistent/recurrent CuTS and 85% after decompression as primary surgical treatment. PRUNE scores were significantly decreased in both groups at all follow-up moments after surgery compared with pre-operative for the total questionnaire and subscales "pain," "sensory/motor symptoms," and "specific activities." In both groups, PRUNE score remained stable until 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This prospective study confirms previous results from retrospective studies showing that SMT is an effective surgical option for persistent or recurrent CuTS. Prospective (randomized controlled) trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of SMT to the surgical alternative of subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve.

Surgery versus conservative treatment for traumatic acute subdural haematoma: a prospective, multicentre, observational, comparative effectiveness study.

BACKGROUND: Despite being well established, acute surgery in traumatic acute subdural haematoma is based on low-grade evidence. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of a strategy preferring acute surgical evacuation with one preferring initial conservative treatment in acute subdural haematoma. METHODS: We did a prospective, observational, comparative effectiveness study using data from participants enrolled in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) cohort. We included patients with no pre-existing severe neurological disorders who presented with acute subdural haematoma within 24 h of traumatic brain injury. Using an instrumental variable analysis, we compared outcomes between centres according to treatment preference for acute subdural haematoma (acute surgical evacuation or initial conservative treatment), measured by the case-mix-adjusted percentage of acute surgery per centre. The primary endpoint was functional outcome at 6 months as rated with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, which was estimated with ordinal regression as a common odds ratio (OR) and adjusted for prespecified confounders. Variation in centre preference was quantified with the median OR (MOR). CENTER-TBI is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, and the Resource Identification Portal (Research Resource Identifier SCR_015582). FINDINGS: Between Dec 19, 2014 and Dec 17, 2017, 4559 patients with traumatic brain injury were enrolled in CENTER-TBI, of whom 1407 (31%) presented with acute subdural haematoma and were included in our study. Acute surgical evacuation was done in 336 (24%) patients, by craniotomy in 245 (73%) of those patients and by decompressive craniectomy in 91 (27%). Delayed decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy after initial conservative treatment (n=982) occurred in 107 (11%) patients. The percentage of patients who underwent acute surgery ranged from 5·6% to 51·5% (IQR 12·3-35·9) between centres, with a two-times higher probability of receiving acute surgery for an identical patient in one centre versus another centre at random (adjusted MOR for acute surgery 1·8; p<0·0001]). Centre preference for acute surgery over initial conservative treatment was not associated with improvements in functional outcome (common OR per 23·6% [IQR increase] more acute surgery in a centre 0·92, 95% CI 0·77-1·09). INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that treatment for patients with acute subdural haematoma with similar characteristics differed depending on the treating centre, because of variation in the preferred approach. A treatment strategy preferring an aggressive approach of acute surgical evacuation over initial conservative treatment was not associated with better functional outcome. Therefore, in a patient with acute subdural haematoma for whom a neurosurgeon sees no clear superiority for acute surgery over conservative treatment, initial conservative treatment might be considered. FUNDING: The Hersenstichting Nederland (also known as the Dutch Brain Foundation), the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme, the Hannelore Kohl Stiftung (Germany), OneMind (USA), Integra LifeSciences Corporation (USA), and NeuroTrauma Sciences (USA).

Dutch injection versus surgery trial in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (DISTRICTS): protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing two treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral neuropathy. The optimal treatment strategy is still unknown. The objective of the Dutch Injection versus Surgery TRIal in patients with CTS (DISTRICTS) is to investigate if initial surgery of CTS results in a better clinical outcome and is more cost-effective when compared with initial treatment with corticosteroid injection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISTRICTS is an ongoing multicenter, open-label randomised controlled trial. Participants with CTS are randomised to treatment with surgery or with a corticosteroid injection. If needed, any additional treatments after this first treatment are allowed and these are not dictated by the study protocol. The primary outcome is the difference between the groups in the proportion of participants recovered at 18 months. Recovery is defined as having no or mild symptoms as measured with the 6-item carpal tunnel symptoms scale. Secondary outcome measurements are among others: time to recovery, hand function, patient satisfaction, quality of life, additional treatments, adverse events, and use of care and health-related costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (study number 2017-171). Study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN Registry: 13164336.

Randomized Evaluation of Surgery in Elderly with Traumatic Acute SubDural Hematoma (RESET-ASDH trial): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with multicenter parallel group design.

BACKGROUND: The rapidly increasing number of elderly (≥ 65 years old) with TBI is accompanied by substantial medical and economic consequences. An ASDH is the most common injury in elderly with TBI and the surgical versus conservative treatment of this patient group remains an important clinical dilemma. Current BTF guidelines are not based on high-quality evidence and compliance is low, allowing for large international treatment variation. The RESET-ASDH trial is an international multicenter RCT on the (cost-)effectiveness of early neurosurgical hematoma evacuation versus initial conservative treatment in elderly with a t-ASDH METHODS: In total, 300 patients will be recruited from 17 Belgian and Dutch trauma centers. Patients ≥ 65 years with at first presentation a GCS ≥ 9 and a t-ASDH > 10 mm or a t-ASDH < 10 mm and a midline shift > 5 mm, or a GCS < 9 with a traumatic ASDH < 10 mm and a midline shift < 5 mm without extracranial explanation for the comatose state, for whom clinical equipoise exists will be randomized to early surgical hematoma evacuation or initial conservative management with the possibility of delayed secondary surgery. When possible, patients or their legal representatives will be asked for consent before inclusion. When obtaining patient or proxy consent is impossible within the therapeutic time window, patients are enrolled using the deferred consent procedure. Medical-ethical approval was obtained in the Netherlands and Belgium. The choice of neurosurgical techniques will be left to the discretion of the neurosurgeon. Patients will be analyzed according to an intention-to-treat design. The primary endpoint will be functional outcome on the GOS-E after 1 year. Patient recruitment starts in 2022 with the exact timing depending on the current COVID-19 crisis and is expected to end in 2024. DISCUSSION: The study results will be implemented after publication and presented on international conferences. Depending on the trial results, the current Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines will either be substantiated by high-quality evidence or will have to be altered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (NTR), Trial NL9012 . CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Trial NCT04648436 .

A delphi procedure on rehabilitation outcome for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury; first phase of the Neurotraumatology Quality Registry (NET-QURE).

OBJECTIVE: To select a set of rehabilitation outcome instruments for a national Neurotrauma Quality Registry (Net-QuRe) among professionals involved in the care of patients with traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: A 3-round online Delphi procedure. SUBJECTS: Eighty professionals from multiple disciplines working in 1 of the 8 participating rehabilitation centres were invited to participate. The response rate varied from 70% to 76% per round. METHODS: For the Delphi procedure, multiple outcome categories were defined based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with concomitant measurement instruments. For each category we strived for consensus on one instrument of at least 75%. RESULTS: After the first round, consensus was reached for the category subjective cognitive functioning. After the second round for quality of life, pain, general functioning, anxiety and depression, general psychological functioning, communication (impairment), and personal factors. Finally, after the third round, consensus was reached for activities of daily living, participation, self-awareness, and aphasia. No consensus was reached for the categories motor function, cognitive function, comorbidity, fatigue, and employment status. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached in 12 out of 17 outcome categories. A Delphi procedure seems to be a feasible method to collectively select measurement instruments for a multicentre study.

Safety and efficacy of C1-inhibitor in traumatic brain injury (CIAO@TBI): study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability across all ages. After the primary impact, the pathophysiologic process of secondary brain injury consists of a neuroinflammation response that critically leads to irreversible brain damage in the first days after the trauma. A key catalyst in this inflammatory process is the complement system. Inhibiting the complement system could therefore be a therapeutic target in TBI. OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) compared to placebo in patients with TBI. By temporarily blocking the complement system, we hypothesize a decrease in the posttraumatic neuroinflammatory response resulting in a less unfavorable clinical outcome for TBI patients. METHODS: CIAO@TBI is a multicenter, randomized, blinded, phase II placebo-controlled trial. Adult TBI patients with GCS < 13 requiring intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring will be randomized, using block randomization, within 12 h after trauma to one dose 6000 IU C1-INH or placebo. A total of 106 patients will be included, and follow-up will occur up to 12 months. The primary endpoints are (1) Therapy Intensity Level (TIL) Scale, (2) Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at 6 months, and (3) complication rate during hospitalization. Outcomes will be determined by a trial nurse blinded for the treatment allocation. Analyses will be conducted in an intention-to-treat analysis. DISCUSSION: We expect that C1-INH administration will be safe and potentially effective to improve clinical outcomes by reducing neuroinflammation in TBI patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04489160. Registered on 27 July 2020. EudraCT 2020-000140-58.

Suprainguinal Re-Resection of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve in Persistence or Recurrence of Meralgia Paresthetica After Previous Transection: Results of a Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Suprainguinal re-resection of the proximal nerve stump can be performed in case of persistent or recurrent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica after previous transection of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). Currently, no long-term results for this procedure have been reported in the literature. METHODS: In this study, 20 consecutive patients with persistent (13 cases) or recurrent (7 cases) symptoms of meralgia paresthetica were reoperated at a mean interval of 16 months after the first transection of the LFCN. The proximal nerve stump was sent for histopathologic analysis of a potential traumatic neuroma. Outcome was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, which was obtained at a mean interval of 3.5 years after the suprainguinal re-resection. RESULTS: The proximal stump of the LFCN was identified in 90% of the cases. Successful pain relief (Likert 1 or 2) was obtained in 65% of the patients. A neuroma was found in 11 cases (55%), mostly in recurrent cases after a pain-free interval. The indication for recurrence of symptoms more frequently resulted in successful pain relief (71%) compared with results for the indication for persistence of symptoms (62%). There was no correlation between the presence of a neuroma and the chance for pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: Suprainguinal re-resection of the LFCN can be a successful procedure, both for persistence and recurrence of symptoms of meralgia paresthetica after previous transection, with long-lasting pain relief. Several factors, however, should be considered before performing this relatively new technique in patients that are discussed in this article.

Preoperative Ultrasound in Patients with Meralgia Paresthetica to Detect Anatomical Variations in the Course of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve.

OBJECTIVE: Sometimes during surgery for meralgia paresthetica, it can be difficult to find the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). The aims of this study were to study the prevalence of different anatomical variations in patients, compare preoperative ultrasound (US) data with intraoperative findings, and investigate the effect of type of anatomical variation on duration of surgery and success rate of localizing the LFCN. METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients with idiopathic meralgia paresthetica who underwent either a neurolysis or neurectomy procedure were included. All patients preoperatively underwent US of the LFCN. Anatomical variations were categorized into type A, B, C, D, and E using the classification of Aszmann and Dellon. The cross-sectional area of the LFCN at the inguinal ligament and the distance of the LFCN to the anterior superior iliac spine were noted. Correlations with intraoperative findings were investigated, as well as the effect on duration of surgery and success rate of finding the LFCN. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Likert scale. RESULTS: The most frequent anatomical variant was type B (79%), followed by type C (9%), D (5%), and E (7%). No type A was encountered. Correlation between preoperative US and intraoperative findings was 100%. During surgery, the LFCN could be identified in all cases. Duration of surgery did not significantly vary for the different anatomical variants. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative US is reliable in detecting anatomical variations of LFCN. This information can be very helpful in identifying the LFCN more frequently and easily during surgery, especially in more medial variants.

Delayed-onset white cord syndrome after anterior and posterior cervical decompression surgery for symptomatic ossification of spinal ligaments: illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND: White cord syndrome is an extremely rare complication of cervical decompressive surgery, characterized by serious postoperative neurological deficits in the absence of apparent surgical complications. It is named after the characteristic ischemic-edematous intramedullary T2-hyperintense signal on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and is believed to be caused by ischemic-reperfusion injury. Neurological deficits typically manifest immediately after surgery, and delayed occurrence has been reported only once. OBSERVATIONS: The authors presented two cases of delayed white cord syndrome after anterior and posterior cervical decompression surgery for symptomatic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum, respectively. Neurological deficits manifested on postoperative day 2 (case 1) and day 8 (case 2). The patients' conditions were managed with high-dose corticosteroids, mean arterial pressure augmentation, and early physical therapy, after which they showed partial neurological recovery at discharge, which improved further by the 3-month follow-up visit. LESSONS: The authors' aim was to raise awareness among spine surgeons about this rare but severe complication of cervical decompressive surgery and to emphasize the mainstays of treatment based on current best evidence: high-dose corticosteroids, mean arterial pressure augmentation, and early physical therapy.

Sublaminar bands in oncological spine surgery: illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND: Sublaminar bands have been used in addition to pedicle screw placement in the correction of idiopathic scoliosis forming a so-called hybrid construct. OBSERVATIONS: In this article, the authors present several cases that demonstrate the potential applications of sublaminar bands in oncological spine surgery. The potential applications are divided into three categories: (1) as an additional tool in salvage procedures, (2) to correct kyphosis in pathological fractures, and (3) for bone graft anchoring to the spine. LESSONS: The cases presented in this article demonstrate the potential beneficial effects of the sublaminar bands in addition to pedicle screw placement.

Clinical Outcome for Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Neuroma With a Processed Nerve Allograft: Results of a Small Prospective Case Series.

Processed nerve allografts are used increasingly in the treatment of traumatic neuroma in small sensory nerves. The goal of the present study was to investigate the use of an allograft after different intervals between injury and repair and to analyze results, not only for the success of pain relief, but also for potential recovery of sensation in time. Four patients with painful neuroma in small sensory nerves in the lower extremity were surgically treated with a decellularized allograft. Patients were followed prospectively for at least 1 y. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Likert scale. Recovery of sensation was tested using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. In all 4 cases an allograft of 3-cm was used to reconstruct a defect in the superficial peroneal (3) or sural nerve (1) after excision of the neuroma. Complete relief of pain symptoms was achieved in 2 patients: 1 case concerned the reconstruction of a neuroma with an interval of less than 1 y between injury and repair and 1 case a neuroma-in-continuity. Sensation recovered completely in these 2 cases. In the other 2 cases, that had an interval between injury and reconstruction of more than 1 y, there was neither successful pain relief nor recovery of sensation. This prospective study shows that processed nerve allografts can be successful for the reconstruction of small sensory nerves after excision of the traumatic neuroma both for recovery of pain and sensation, but in this small case series only if the interval between injury and reconstruction was <1 y.