Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiology ; 260(2): 575-80, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21555351

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) follow-up of distal ureteral calculi by using computed tomography (CT) and conventional radiography (kidneys, ureters, and bladder) as reference standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained. One hundred fifty-eight patients with CT-diagnosed symptomatic ureteral calculi, for whom follow-up imaging was ordered, were enrolled from February 2006 to December 2008. Six were excluded, having not met study entry criteria, with 121 men (mean age, 49 years; range, 20-91 years) and 31 women (mean age, 44 years; range, 34-77 years) completing the protocol with adequate reference standard imaging. Targeted transabdominal US occurred coincidently with follow-up CT (n = 92) or radiography (n = 60), with US evaluation prospectively compared considering sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analysis was performed with a χ(2) test, t test, or paired t test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Results of nine US examinations were nondiagnostic because of inadequate ureteral visualization, and among these, two cases showed residual distal calculi. Of the remaining 143 patients, 33 had residual distal calculi, all visualized with US. There was a single false-positive study, giving sensitivity, including nondiagnostic US examinations, of 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.8%, 99.3%) and specificity of 99.1% (95% CI: 95.3%, 100%). All calculi appeared hyperechoic with posterior acoustic shadowing. Additional diagnostic features included presence of a hypoechoic rim and Doppler twinkle artifact. Mean stone length was 7.2 mm ± 2.6 (standard deviation) (range, 4-18 mm). Mean ureteral length visualized was 36.4 mm (range, 12-77 mm), with calculi positioned at a mean of 13.1 mm ± 11.2 (range, 0-40 mm) from the ureterovesical junction (UVJ). Nondiagnostic results were more likely with bladder volume of 110 mL or less (eight [16%] of 50 vs one [1%] of 102, P = .0009). CONCLUSION: Ureteral calculi within 35 mm of the UVJ can be accurately followed-up by using transabdominal US, which substantially reduces patient radiation burden.


Subject(s)
Ureteral Calculi/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Artifacts , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 73(5): 364-6, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12752302

ABSTRACT

Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is a rare condition in which men have innumerable testicular calcifications. It is increasingly being reported on ultrasound. The published literature has reported an association between confirmed testicular malignancy and testicular microlithiasis. The relationship between TM and the risk of developing malignancy is unclear. The present paper reports a patient with a previously normal scrotal ultrasound except for bilateral sonographically detected TM who developed a testicular tumour. It also discusses the appropriate management of TM after reviewing the published literature.


Subject(s)
Lithiasis/complications , Lithiasis/diagnosis , Seminoma/diagnosis , Seminoma/etiology , Testicular Diseases/complications , Testicular Diseases/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Humans , Lithiasis/therapy , Male , Seminoma/therapy , Testicular Diseases/therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...