Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 33(9): 1925-1931, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931589

ABSTRACT

In this work, we present the efficacy of photodynamic therapy against yeast cells in an animal model. We tested two photosensitizers, methylene blue and protoporphyrin IX. Thirty-seven female BALB-c mice with a body mass of 20-25 g were used. To achieve persistent vaginitis, estrus was induced by subcutaneous injection of 0.1 mg/mL estradiol valerate applied weekly. Three days after pseudo-estrus, intravaginal inoculation with Candida albicans was performed. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection before inoculation, and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) was performed 5 days after fungal inoculation. Two photosensitizers were tested, methylene blue (MB; 100 µM) and protoporphyrin IX (PpNetNI; 10 µM). Two custom-made LEDs emitting light at 660 and 630 nm at approximately 800 mW each were used for irradiation. The aPDT treatment reduced the fungal colony-forming units (CFUs) by one order of magnitude for the MB (p = 0.020) and PpNetNI (p = 0.018) photosensitizers. Seven days after the treatment, there were significantly fewer CFUs compared to the control group (p = 0.041 and p = 0.035 for MB and PpNetNI, respectively), but this was not increased compared to the initial number immediately after aPDT. Using aPDT as a therapeutic option to decrease fungal infection in a vaginal candidiasis model resulted in a significant reduction in the C. albicans population. Both photosensitizers were effective for preventing reinfection within 7 days. The aPDT also had no effect on the vaginal mucosa at the ultrastructural level. In addition to the fungicide effect, we observed reduced swelling and lack of the formation of abscesses, microabscesses coating the cornified epithelial layer, and the accumulation of neutrophils in the submucosa.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Animals , Candida albicans/drug effects , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/microbiology , Female , Humans , Inflammation/pathology , Methylene Blue/pharmacology , Methylene Blue/therapeutic use , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Neutrophils/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Protoporphyrins/pharmacology , Protoporphyrins/therapeutic use , Vagina/drug effects , Vagina/microbiology , Vagina/pathology
2.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 14: 111-4, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26995104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the photoinactivation of C. albicans biofilm on acrylic resin discs (the standard material for dental prosthesis) using the photosensitizers Methylene Blue and a Protoporphyrin IX. METHODS: Eighteen thermally activated Methyl Methacrylate Polymers were used for the biofilm growth of Candida albicans ATCC 10231. Two photosensitizers were tested: methylene blue (50µM) and protoporphyrin IX (10µM). Two custom-made LEDs emitting at 660nm and 630nm with approximately 800mW each were used for the irradiation, with duration ranging from 2 to 10min. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that MB decreased the aPDT CFUs by approximately two orders of magnitude, but the protoporphyrin was ineffective. CONCLUSION: The aPDT with MB significantly reduces (but does not sterilize) the amount of CFU after 10min of irradiation, and it is not dose-dependent. The lack of effect of the protoporphyrin is likely because the negative charges of the proteoglycans present in the extracellular matrix repel the negative charges of the PS, thus preventing its diffusion in the cells.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Candida albicans/drug effects , Candida albicans/radiation effects , Methylene Blue/therapeutic use , Photosensitizing Agents , Protoporphyrins/therapeutic use , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/radiation effects , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
3.
Trials ; 15: 443, 2014 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25394474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Halitosis is a common problem that affects a large portion of the population worldwide. The origin of this condition is oral in 90% and systemic in 10% of cases. The unpleasant odor is mainly the result of volatile sulfur compounds produced by Gram-negative bacteria. However, it has recently been found that anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria also produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the presence of amino acids, such as cysteine. Light, both with and without the use of chemical agents, has been used to induce therapeutic and antimicrobial effects. In photodynamic therapy, the antimicrobial effect is confined to areas covered by photosensitizing dye. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy on halitosis in adolescents through the analysis of volatile sulfur compounds measured using gas chromatography and microbiological analysis of coated tongue. METHODS/DESIGN: A quantitative clinical trial will be carried out involving 60 adolescents randomly divided into the following groups: group 1 will receive treatment with a tongue scraper, group 2 will receive photodynamic therapy applied to the posterior two-thirds of the dorsum of the tongue, and group 3 will receive combined treatment (tongue scraper and photodynamic therapy). Gas chromatography (OralChromaTM) and microbiological analysis will be used for the diagnosis of halitosis at the beginning of the study. Post-treatment evaluations will be conducted at one hour and 24 hours after treatment. The statistical analysis will include the Shapiro-Wilk test for the determination of the distribution of the data. If normal distribution is demonstrated, analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test will be used to compare groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test will be used for data with non-normal distribution. Either the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon test will be used to compare data before and after treatment, depending on the distribution of the data. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will determine the efficacy of using photodynamic therapy alone or in combination with a tongue scraper to treat bad breath in adolescents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this study was registered with Clinical Trials (registration number NCT02007993) on 10 December 2013.


Subject(s)
Halitosis/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Research Design , Tongue/microbiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Bacteria/growth & development , Bacteria/metabolism , Biofilms/growth & development , Brazil , Chromatography, Gas , Clinical Protocols , Combined Modality Therapy , Dental Devices, Home Care , Female , Halitosis/diagnosis , Halitosis/microbiology , Humans , Male , Methylene Blue/administration & dosage , Oral Hygiene/instrumentation , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Sulfur Compounds/metabolism , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Volatilization
4.
J Lasers Med Sci ; 5(3): 146-52, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25653814

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Halitosis is a common problem that affects a large portion of the population worldwide. The origin of this condition is oral in 90% of cases and systemic in 10% of cases. The foul odor is caused mainly by volatile sulfur compounds produced by Gram-negative bacteria. However, it has recently been found that anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria also produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the presence of amino acids, such as cysteine. Light with and without the combination of chemical agents has been used to induce therapeutic and antimicrobial effects. In photodynamic therapy, the antimicrobial effect is confined to areas covered by the photosensitizing dye. The aim of the present case series study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy on halitosis in adolescents through the analysis of volatile sulfur compounds measured using a sulfide meter (Halimeter®). METHODS: Five adolescents aged 14 to 16 years were evaluated using a sulfide meter before and one hour after photodynamic therapy, which involved the use of methylene blue 0.005% on the middle third and posterior thirds of the dorsum of the tongue and nine points of laser irradiation in the red band (660 nm) with an energy dose of 9 J, power output of 100 mW and 90-seconds exposure time. RESULTS: A 31.8% reduction in the concentration of volatile sulfur compounds was found in the comparison of the initial and final readings. The statistically significant reduction (p = 0.0091) led to an absence of halitosis following treatment (mean: 58.2 ppb). CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy seems to be effective on reduction the concentration of volatile sulfur compounds.Considering the positive effects of photodynamic therapy in this case series, further studies involving microbiological analyses should be conducted to allow comparisons of the results.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...