Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 24(5): 505-513, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28870727

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) improved intensive care unit (ICU), hospital and 28-day survival in ICUs with low levels of antibiotic resistance. Yet it is unclear whether the effect differs between medical and surgical ICU patients. METHODS: In an individual patient data meta-analysis, we systematically searched PubMed and included all randomized controlled studies published since 2000. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis with separate logistic regression models per study and per outcome (hospital survival and ICU survival) and subsequent pooling of main and interaction effects. RESULTS: Six studies, all performed in countries with low levels of antibiotic resistance, yielded 16 528 hospital admissions and 17 884 ICU admissions for complete case analysis. Compared to standard care or placebo, the pooled adjusted odds ratios for hospital mortality was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.93) for SDD and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97) for SOD. Compared to SOD, the adjusted odds ratio for hospital mortality was 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.97) for SDD. The effects on hospital mortality were not modified by type of ICU admission (p values for interaction terms were 0.66 for SDD and control, 0.87 for SOD and control and 0.47 for SDD and SOD). Similar results were found for ICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In ICUs with low levels of antibiotic resistance, the effectiveness of SDD and SOD was not modified by type of ICU admission. SDD and SOD improved hospital and ICU survival compared to standard care in both patient populations, with SDD being more effective than SOD.


Subject(s)
Decontamination , Disinfection , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Intensive Care Units , Oropharynx/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Decontamination/methods , Disinfection/methods , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Odds Ratio , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Neth J Med ; 73(4): 169-74, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25968288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs) is a major threat to critical care patients, leading to worse outcomes, need for isolation measures, and demand for second-line or rescue antibiotics. The aim of this study was to quantify the burden of HRMOs in an intensive care unit (ICU) for adult patients in a university hospital in the Netherlands. We evaluated local distribution of different HRMO categories and proportion of ICU-imported versus ICU- acquired HRMOs. Outcome of HRMO-positive patients versuscontrols was compared. METHODS: In this prospective single-centre study, culture results of all ICU patients during a four-month period were recorded, as well as APACHE scores, ICU mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU. RESULTS: 58 of 962 (6.0%) patients were HRMO positive during ICU stay. The majority (60%) of those patients were HRMO positive on ICU admission. HRMO-positive patients had significantly higher APACHE scores, longer LOS and higher mortality compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a large part of antibiotic resistance in the ICU is imported. This underscores the importance of a robust surveillance and infection control program throughout the hospital, and implies that better recognition of those at risk for HRMO carriage before ICU admission may be worthwhile. Only a small minority of patients with HRMO at admission did not have any known risk factors for HRMO.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial/physiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Pseudomonas Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , APACHE , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Enterobacteriaceae/physiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli/physiology , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, University , Humans , Klebsiella/physiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas/physiology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Young Adult
3.
Br J Surg ; 99(2): 232-7, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22021072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are effective in improving survival in patients under intensive care. In this study possible differential effects in surgical and non-surgical patients were investigated. METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of data from a cluster-randomized multicentre trial comparing three groups (SDD, SOD or standard care) to quantify effects among surgical and non-surgical patients. The primary study outcome was 28-day mortality rate. Duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, and bacteraemia rates were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The subgroup analyses included a total of 2762 surgical and 3165 non-surgical patients. Compared with standard care, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for mortality were comparable in SDD-treated surgical and non-surgical patients: 0·86 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·69 to 1·09; P = 0·220) and 0·85 (0·70 to 1·03; P = 0·095) respectively. However, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay were significantly reduced in surgical patients who had SDD. SOD did not reduce mortality compared with standard treatment in surgical patients (adjusted OR 0·97, 0·77 to 1·22; P = 0·801); in non-surgical patients it reduced mortality (adjusted OR 0·77, 0·63 to 0·94; P = 0·009) by 16·6 per cent, representing an absolute mortality reduction of 5·5 per cent with number needed to treat of 18. CONCLUSION: Subgroup analysis found similar effects of SDD in reducing mortality in surgical and non-surgical ICU patients, whereas SOD reduced mortality only in non-surgical patients. The hypothesis-generating findings mandate investigation into mechanisms between different ICU populations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Critical Care/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Decontamination/methods , Administration, Oral , Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Bacteremia/etiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Cluster Analysis , Colistin/administration & dosage , Cross Infection/mortality , Digestive System Diseases/microbiology , Digestive System Diseases/prevention & control , Drug Combinations , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharynx/microbiology , Pharyngeal Diseases/microbiology , Pharyngeal Diseases/prevention & control , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Tobramycin/administration & dosage
4.
N Engl J Med ; 360(1): 20-31, 2009 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19118302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are infection-prevention measures used in the treatment of some patients in intensive care, but reported effects on patient outcome are conflicting. METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of SDD and SOD in a crossover study using cluster randomization in 13 intensive care units (ICUs), all in The Netherlands. Patients with an expected duration of intubation of more than 48 hours or an expected ICU stay of more than 72 hours were eligible. In each ICU, three regimens (SDD, SOD, and standard care) were applied in random order over the course of 6 months. Mortality at day 28 was the primary end point. SDD consisted of 4 days of intravenous cefotaxime and topical application of tobramycin, colistin, and amphotericin B in the oropharynx and stomach. SOD consisted of oropharyngeal application only of the same antibiotics. Monthly point-prevalence studies were performed to analyze antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: A total of 5939 patients were enrolled in the study, with 1990 assigned to standard care, 1904 to SOD, and 2045 to SDD; crude mortality in the groups at day 28 was 27.5%, 26.6%, and 26.9%, respectively. In a random-effects logistic-regression model with age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, intubation status, and medical specialty used as covariates, odds ratios for death at day 28 in the SOD and SDD groups, as compared with the standard-care group, were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.99) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In an ICU population in which the mortality rate associated with standard care was 27.5% at day 28, the rate was reduced by an estimated 3.5 percentage points with SDD and by 2.9 percentage points with SOD. (Controlled Clinical Trials number, ISRCTN35176830.)


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Decontamination , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Oropharynx/microbiology , APACHE , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial
5.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 152(13): 752-9, 2008 Mar 29.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18461894

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of oral decontamination with either chlorhexidine (CHX, 2%) or the combination chlorhexidine-colistin (CHX-COL, 2%-2%) on the frequency and the time to onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia in Intensive Care patients. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, randomised trial. METHODS: Consecutive ICU patients needing at least 48 h of mechanical ventilation were enrolled in a randomized trial with 3 arms: CHX, CHX-COL, and placebo (PLAC). The trial medication was administered in the oral cavity every 6 h. Oropharyngeal swabs were obtained daily and analysed quantitatively for Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. Endotracheal colonisation was monitored twice weekly. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was diagnosed on the basis of a combination of clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria. RESULTS: Of 385 patients included, 130 received PLAC, 127 CHX and 128 CHX-COL. Baseline characteristics in the three groups were comparable. The daily risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia was reduced in both treatment groups compared to PLAC: 65% (HR= 0.352; 95% CI: 0.160-0.791; p = 0.012) for CHX and 55% (HR= 0.454; 95%/ CI: 0.224-0.925; p = 0.030) for CHX-COL. CHX-COL provided a significant reduction in oropharyngeal colonisation with both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms, whereas CHX significantly affected only colonisation with Gram-positive microorganisms. There were no differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU-stay or ICU-survival. CONCLUSION: Oral decontamination of the oropharyngeal cavity with chlorhexidine or the combination chlorhexidine-colistin reduced the incidence and the time to onset ofventilator-associated pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Mouth/drug effects , Pneumonia, Bacterial/prevention & control , Ventilators, Mechanical/adverse effects , Administration, Topical , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Colistin/administration & dosage , Colistin/therapeutic use , Critical Care , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth/microbiology , Oropharynx/microbiology , Placebos , Time Factors , Trachea/microbiology
7.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 147(8): 327-31, 2003 Feb 22.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12661116

ABSTRACT

For patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) the most important objective of mechanical ventilation is opening and keeping open the alveoli to achieve adequate oxygenation, without further damaging the lungs or negatively affecting the circulation. Alveolar recruitment is achieved by making use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The best PEEP level is that with which the largest improvement in oxygen transport and lung compliance is achieved, without a decrease in the stroke volume of the left ventricle. In addition to the usual volume-controlled ventilation with PEEP, pressure-limited ventilation is also possible. In this a preselected pressure is never exceeded, whereas a maximum inspiratory airflow at the start of inspiration provides more opportunity for gaseous exchange. The oxygenation can possibly be further improved by increasing the inspiration-expiration ratio. As a result of the reduced expiratory period the alveoli which tend to collapse at the end of a normal expiration are kept open. Mechanical ventilation with a lower tidal volume decreases mortality. Ventilation in a prone position increases the end-expiratory lung volume and reduces the intrapulmonary shunt and the regional differences in the degree of ventilation. These factors possibly contribute to preventing ventilation-induced lung damage. Administration of natural surfactant during the ventilation of patients with ARDS seems to be a highly promising strategy; the clinical effectiveness still needs to be demonstrated.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Alveoli/physiology , Pulmonary Gas Exchange/physiology , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Humans , Lung Compliance , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Prone Position/physiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiratory Mechanics , Stroke Volume , Tidal Volume
8.
J Hosp Infect ; 51(2): 89-95, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12090795

ABSTRACT

Between December 1999 and June 2000, an outbreak caused by Acinetobacter emerged on the neurosurgical intensive care unit of our hospital. It was shown using automated ribotyping using Eco RI and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis that the outbreak was caused by spread of a single strain, which was identified by ribotyping and amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis as Acinetobacter DNA group 13TU (sensu Tjernberg and Ursing). The outbreak strain, which showed no antibiotic resistance, was identified in 23 patients, five of whom developed an infection. The organism was also isolated from various environmental sites. Cross-transmission among patients continued despite contact isolation of colonized patients and reinforcement of basic disinfection procedures. Eventually, after implementation of additional stringent measures such as cohorting of positive patients and daily disinfection of the floor, the outbreak was brought under control. This study demonstrates that apart from Acinetobacter baumanii, Acinetobacter 13TU strains, even when they are fully susceptible, may cause outbreaks that are difficult to control. Correct identification to the species level of Acinetobacter by genotypic methods is necessary to get insight in the importance of the different Acinetobacter genomic species in hospital epidemiology.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/epidemiology , Acinetobacter/isolation & purification , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Infection Control/methods , Acinetobacter/classification , Adult , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Ribotyping/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...